Chuck Hartle is the founder and president of PartsEdge, a powertool for New Car Dealerships Parts Operations, helping to increase DMS utilization, improves efficiency, accuracy, and profitability with solid and consistent plans for eliminating all types of idle inventory in a Parts Operations. With over 40 years in the auto industry Chuck has the know-how and love for the industry that has enabled PartsEdge to identify the biggest needs of dealerships.
Understanding the Complexity of Parts Returns
In the automotive parts industry, managing the return process can often be an intricate task. Dealerships grapple with multiple criteria when dealing with parts manufacturers. The need for efficiency is paramount. However, not all manufacturers offer straightforward processes, which can frustrate dealerships. On the Parts Management Podcast, Chuck Hartle sheds light on the different return processes across manufacturers, with a keen focus on Toyota.
Toyota’s Simplified Return Process
Toyota Motor Corp (TMC) stands out with a notably streamlined process for parts returns. Chuck Hartle emphasizes the simplicity of Toyota's criteria during the podcast discussion. Toyota dealerships benefit from clear guidelines, reducing the hassle often associated with parts returns. Toyota's approach offers a model that many dealerships wish other manufacturers would adopt.
The three clear criteria for returns are embraced by Toyota dealerships. The first criterion is for parts purchased between 10 to 17 months ago, allowing returns without a receipt for items over $8. Secondly, for parts older than 18 months, dealers can return them but incur a 20% restocking fee. Lastly, the TORA program enables returns of special orders within 90 days.
The Challenges Across Other Manufacturers
While Toyota offers a streamlined approach, other manufacturers maintain more complex systems. This complexity often leads to frustration amongst parts managers. Chuck highlights this during the podcast and mentions the difficulties dealerships face when working with manufacturers like GM and Chrysler. These brands often lack sufficient return allowances, further complicating the process.
Ford also exhibits a more conditional approach. Their RIM program involves accruing money over 60 days, adding layers to the process. These varied criteria across manufacturers demand managers to apply rigorous logic and organization.
——————————————–
This show is powered by PartsEdge: Your go-to solution for transforming dealership parts inventory into a powerhouse of profitability. Their strategies are proven to amp up parts sales by a whopping 20%, all while cutting down on idle inventory. If you’re looking to optimize your parts management, visit 🔗 www.partsedge.com.
——————————————–
Key Takeaways
- Toyota offers straightforward parts returns.
- Know part sources for smooth returns.
- Different makers have varying return rules.
“What the ASR programs are terrible at doing is tracking credit returns and now guaranteeing the two.” -Chuck Hartle
Chuck Hartle
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/chuck-hartle-1923ab14
Website: www.partsedge.com
Kaylee Felio
LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/gotopartsgirl
Website: www.partsedge.com