Episodes

  • "Apple's Grip on Tech Markets Faces Landmark Antitrust Showdown"

    "Apple's Grip on Tech Markets Faces Landmark Antitrust Showdown"
    Oct 30 2025
    The United States Department of Justice’s lawsuit against Apple has seen several headline shifts in the past few days, most of them signaling a ramp-up in antitrust scrutiny as Apple doubles down on its control of key tech markets. This case is not background noise—it is the lead story, with the Justice Department and sixteen states and districts pushing allegations that Apple’s unique grip over smartphones, apps, and now artificial intelligence puts competitors, small businesses, and marketers behind a wall that’s getting taller instead of weaker.

    At the heart of the lawsuit, the Department of Justice claims Apple is acting as a gatekeeper—blocking “super apps,” limiting cloud gaming, keeping iMessage isolated, controlling the Apple Watch’s compatibility, and locking digital wallet competitors out of “tap-to-pay” on the iPhone. Essentially, the DOJ says Apple’s walled garden stifles new ideas, keeps prices up for consumers, and has started to reach into the emerging field of artificial intelligence, where control over voice assistants and on-device processing could let Apple shape the future of discovery and commerce.

    Jonathan Kanter, head of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, has kept the pressure on, publicly criticizing recent outcomes against other tech giants and pledging to make this Apple case a pivot point for competition law. The DOJ’s recent whistleblower program, with partners from the postal service, highlights its push for aggressive antitrust enforcement, rewarding insiders for exposing illegal conduct and signaling that the Apple case is part of a broader crackdown.

    On Apple’s side, Tim Cook and executive leadership have responded by defending their policies as pro-user and pro-privacy, pointing to App Store security and privacy moves like App Tracking Transparency as innovations that benefit consumers. However, industry observers say these same moves have also made advertising and performance marketing much harder, driving costs up and forcing marketers to rethink how they reach potential customers on iPhones.

    Major developments in the past week include a federal judge decertifying a class action lawsuit against Apple, which originally represented more than ten million Americans claiming harm from Apple’s alleged monopoly in the app market. Apple scored that win, arguing there was no reliable method to track who was truly harmed, but the DOJ’s own suit is separate and keeps moving forward with its deeper and broader focus. For the DOJ, the loss of the class action doesn’t slow their antitrust strategy, especially with significant state attorney general support.

    Market analysts are now projecting a long battle, with trial arguments scheduled for the next two years and possible operational changes at Apple looming if the Department of Justice prevails. In the short term, the industry is in limbo: app developers, small businesses, and especially marketers face higher costs and less access to user data. That means small companies struggle to compete, innovation inside the App Store is under pressure, and digital advertising is having to evolve fast.

    Bigger picture, this case could reshape not just how smartphones and app stores work, but how artificial intelligence gets built into daily tech life. If Apple loses, it might need to open up critical features—like letting apps bypass the App Store, supporting more cross-platform tools, and unlocking payment options. Some see echoes of Europe’s Digital Markets Act, which has pushed Apple to make modest concessions and pay fines in recent months, but those regulatory moves haven’t yet upended Apple’s business model.

    Industry insiders warn that if Apple is forced to loosen its grip, marketers and smaller developers could see more opportunity—and consumers could get more choices at lower prices. On the other hand, if Apple manages to fend off the DOJ, its framework for controlling user access and data could become the blueprint for future tech giants as artificial intelligence continues to rewrite the rules.

    For now, all eyes remain on DOJ’s antitrust team, with Jonathan Kanter leading the charge, while Tim Cook and Apple’s legal department mount their defense. Major wins and losses are still to come, but with artificial intelligence now front and center in the allegations, the stakes are higher than ever—not just for Apple, but for the entire tech landscape.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Show More Show Less
    5 mins
  • Apple Under Intense Antitrust Scrutiny Globally

    Apple Under Intense Antitrust Scrutiny Globally
    Oct 23 2025
    In recent days, there have been no specific updates from the past few days regarding the Department of Justice's current suit against Apple. However, Apple remains under intense scrutiny from various antitrust challenges globally. The company is facing a new antitrust complaint in the European Union, alleging that Apple's App Store rules and device terms of service violate the Digital Markets Act. This complaint, filed by civil rights groups Article Nineteen and Germany's Society for Civil Rights, targets Apple's restrictions on third-party software apps and app stores, which they claim harm business users and end users.

    In the United States, Apple is involved in an ongoing antitrust saga with Epic Games over App Store policies. The case is currently before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, where Apple is appealing a ruling that it must allow developers to direct customers to cheaper payment options outside the App Store. Additionally, Apple is facing a separate antitrust lawsuit from the Justice Department and a group of state attorneys general, although specific developments in this suit from the past few days are not reported.

    The European Union's Digital Markets Act imposes strict rules on large tech platforms like Apple to prevent them from favoring their own products or locking in users. Any adverse ruling could result in significant fines for Apple, potentially up to ten percent of its global turnover.

    Key figures in the antitrust landscape include those from the Justice Department, such as Merrick Garland, the Attorney General, although there are no recent specific updates on their involvement in the Apple case. From Apple's side, figures like Tim Cook, the CEO, are at the forefront of the company's legal strategies and public responses to these challenges.

    The ongoing legal battles against Apple reflect broader industry trends, where tech giants face increasing regulatory pressure to maintain fair competition and user choice. The outcomes of these cases are likely to have profound implications for the tech industry, potentially reshaping how companies manage their platforms and interact with developers and users.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Show More Show Less
    2 mins
  • "Apple's App Store Dominance Faces Landmark Antitrust Showdown"

    "Apple's App Store Dominance Faces Landmark Antitrust Showdown"
    Oct 16 2025
    The antitrust case between the United States Department of Justice and Apple has moved into a critical phase in the past few days. The heart of the dispute is whether Apple’s App Store policies violate antitrust laws, with the Department of Justice arguing that Apple has formed an unlawful monopoly over software distribution for iPhones. Apple, as you probably guessed, strongly denies these claims and recently tried to get the case thrown out on summary judgment.

    On Tuesday, October fourteenth, the federal judge handling the case signaled that Apple’s motion to dismiss is unlikely to succeed. The judge did say she might decertify the class of consumers alleging harm, which would limit the scope of who could join the suit if it moves forward, but Apple’s push to have the charges dropped altogether is not expected to work. This marks a major loss for Apple, as it clears the way for a potentially damaging trial. On the flip side, Apple’s chance of shrinking the class could lighten the immediate legal exposure.

    Key people from the Department of Justice involved include leadership from the Antitrust Division, which is driving the effort. The current head is Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter, who has been vocal about increasing enforcement against big tech platforms. For Apple, Chief Executive Tim Cook remains central; while he has not commented publicly on the most recent rulings, Apple’s legal team is working overtime on appeals and procedural challenges.

    Major wins for the Department of Justice include persuading the judge not to toss out the case, which keeps the spotlight on Apple’s business practices. Apple’s partial win could come from possible class decertification, but the broader anti-monopoly claim survives.

    Projections from legal experts suggest that, if Apple ultimately loses, we could see forced changes in how the App Store operates—such as easing rules for competitors, lowering fees, or allowing outside payment processing. That could ripple throughout the tech industry, affecting app developers, payment services, and even end users. Other platforms with similar dominance, like Google, may face renewed scrutiny.

    The broader impact involves setting new rules for digital platform competition. If the Department of Justice prevails, it could slow Apple’s revenue from its App Store while shaking up the entire industry’s approach to app distribution and payments. Tech watchers are calling this one of the most important antitrust battles since the Microsoft cases decades ago.

    For now, federal courts remain open and the shutdown has not significantly hit the proceedings. Everyone in the legal community is watching closely. Stay tuned, this case is building toward a showdown that could change how your favorite apps work.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • "Antitrust Case Against Apple Paused Amid Government Shutdown"

    "Antitrust Case Against Apple Paused Amid Government Shutdown"
    Oct 9 2025
    The United States Department of Justice’s high-profile antitrust case against Apple has come to a grinding halt in the past week, as a government shutdown that began on October first forced the court to pause all discovery and litigation deadlines. The discovery freeze is a technical win for Apple, giving the company a breather from delivering documents and data that the Department of Justice has termed evasive and slow to materialize in recent months.

    Key details: The case, led by the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, focuses on allegations that Apple has illegally preserved its grip over the smartphone market by locking out competitors and keeping prices high for both users and app developers. Presiding in a New Jersey federal court, Judge Wettre confirmed the discovery pause early this week, making clear that all motions and deadlines are “administratively terminated” until Congress can resolve the funding standoff. The court stressed that the case is not dismissed, just paused. Once federal funding is restored, it is expected the Department of Justice will file a motion to reactivate the suit, rapidly resuming litigation steps.

    During this lull, Apple is spared from producing several tranches of business and human resources data that government lawyers have requested since September. The Department of Justice has been especially vocal that Apple’s delays are strategic, pointing to the company’s arguments about trade secrets and privacy, as well as its reluctance to provide global data or agree on basic business definitions. Government attorneys have accused Apple of inventing excuses and have contrasted its tactics to those of Google, which they say has been more forthcoming in antitrust litigation. The Department of Justice even petitioned for judicial intervention just before the shutdown, asking the court to break the deadlock in data handoff.

    From Apple, the public line remains that its so-called walled garden enhances security and user experience, not competition. Recent legal filings from Apple’s team doubled down on the risk of what they call government overreach, painting the case as a threat to innovation. Inside the company, top executives including Chief Compliance Officer Kyle Andeer have been active, also dealing with EU investigations and policy compliance overseas.

    For the Department of Justice, leadership under Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter has defined the Biden-era push for challenging tech monopolies. Kanter and his team have pointed to Apple as the archetype of a new digital gatekeeper, echoing broader global scrutiny of dominant platforms.

    So who is winning? In the immediate sense, Apple has scored a delay – not a true victory, but time to regroup on legal strategy, lobby lawmakers, and perhaps bolster relations with developers or other business partners. The Department of Justice, on the other hand, is losing precious time to gather records and press its case during a period it previously said was critical for building momentum.

    Industry watchers, from legal analysts to software startups, are on edge about what happens when the government reopens. The outcome of this suit could force Apple to rethink how the App Store works, potentially unlocking its system for rival app markets or alternative payment systems. There is even discussion that a DOJ win could produce knock-on effects for Android providers and reshape the rules for any company building digital ecosystems.

    One thing is certain: The suit is paused, not over. Apple will need to keep its legal defense in high gear, and the Department of Justice is expected to come back strong when the courts reopen. The broader tech world is eyeing Washington and Brussels for signs of where the next domino will fall in this era of corporate scrutiny and digital power shifts.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins
  • Clash of Tech Giants: DOJ Accuses Apple of Anticompetitive Practices, Shaping the Future of Mobile Platforms and AI

    Clash of Tech Giants: DOJ Accuses Apple of Anticompetitive Practices, Shaping the Future of Mobile Platforms and AI
    Oct 2 2025
    The legal clash between the United States Department of Justice and Apple has taken center stage again in the past few days, with both the tech industry and Washington watching closely. The main narrative? The Department of Justice’s ongoing antitrust suit accuses Apple of abusing its dominance in the smartphone and mobile performance markets, particularly through practices that limit competition and reinforce the company’s walled garden.

    Key updates this week focus on Apple’s aggressive pushback in court. Apple’s legal team has filed motions insisting the suit should be dismissed, calling the government’s claims speculative and highlighting that Apple’s integration of outside artificial intelligence models—like its much-debated partnership with OpenAI for the iPhone—does not violate the law. Lawyers for the Department of Justice, led by antitrust division chief Jonathan Kanter, counter that Apple’s conduct amounts to rigging the market and locking in users, blocking innovative “super apps” and stifling competition from alternative mobile services.

    From the Apple side, senior figures including top legal counsel and product executives have appeared in media and legal filings reiterating a commitment to consumer privacy and a multi-partner approach to artificial intelligence. The company has responded to additional pressure from competitors like Elon Musk’s xAI, which recently filed its own lawsuit accusing Apple and OpenAI of collusion and anti-competitive tactics around App Store rankings and generative AI integration. OpenAI and Apple both argue these claims lack real-world harm and call out Musk’s suit as speculative at best, with Apple emphasizing that partnerships are not exclusive and that other generative AI models will be welcomed in the future.

    So far, neither side has scored a decisive courtroom win. Apple did notch a small victory recently in a different case involving Amazon, where a Seattle federal judge dismissed a price-fixing lawsuit regarding iPhones and iPads on procedural grounds. That result gave Apple a brief break, but it does not directly impact the high-stakes Department of Justice antitrust fight. The Department of Justice’s suit remains the larger and more existential legal threat, with its potential to reshape how Apple—and possibly other large platforms—must operate if the government prevails.

    Legal experts tracking this dispute are divided on the likely outcome. Some see the government’s case as tough to prove, especially if Apple’s non-exclusive AI deals and frequent reference to privacy and technical limitations hold up in court. Others note that if courts find Apple’s integration requirements and app ranking practices truly exclude viable competitors, it could force sweeping changes in how mobile platforms operate—not just for Apple but across the whole tech landscape.

    The ramifications extend beyond the courtroom. For rival tech firms and app developers, the case’s outcome may dictate their access to critical user bases and their ability to compete on a level playing field. For consumers, it could mean more choices and potentially less lock-in to one ecosystem. In the artificial intelligence race, the dispute may decide whether one or two big players control the key channels to market or if a wider field of innovators gets a shot.

    Ultimately, while Apple insists its handpicked system is about security, quality, and privacy, the Department of Justice is making an argument for competition and market freedom. With regulatory and court actions moving in parallel both in the United States and internationally, this lawsuit is poised to be a landmark, with ripple effects for Big Tech operations, antitrust enforcement, and digital competition for years to come. Watch for the court’s next moves and possible decisions on whether the case will proceed or be trimmed down, likely shaping the future of app stores, artificial intelligence, and the mobile universe.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins
  • "Showdown Looms as DOJ Escalates Antitrust Battle with Apple"

    "Showdown Looms as DOJ Escalates Antitrust Battle with Apple"
    Sep 25 2025
    The United States Department of Justice is ramping up its fight against Apple in an antitrust case that’s grabbing headlines this week, as government lawyers and Apple’s team gear up for a new round of arguments that could reshape how the tech giant does business and ripple across the entire digital landscape.

    The case is currently centered in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, where a recent three-judge ruling tossed out a private suit claiming Apple and Google conspired not to compete in paid search advertising—mostly upholding earlier decisions in Apple’s favor. But the focus now is squarely on broader antitrust accusations, many spearheaded by the Department of Justice and state attorneys general, who argue Apple uses its immense control over its platforms and its relationships with other tech giants to stifle competition and inflate prices for consumers and advertisers.

    Key players on the Department of Justice side include Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust, Gail Slater, who publicly emphasized last week the Biden administration’s commitment to using big antitrust cases to promote innovation in tech, following the legacy of historic battles against companies like Microsoft. On Apple’s side, the top brass are closely involved in preparations and strategy, though Tim Cook has largely kept a low public profile as the company weighs both legal risks and potential product impacts.

    Recent court action hasn’t all been grim for Apple. Earlier in September, the three-judge panel firmly rejected claims that Apple and Google had an illegal “don’t compete” agreement about search, noting that while Apple did set Google as the default on Safari, there was no direct evidence of an unlawful “horizontal conspiracy.” They said nothing in the agreement explicitly stopped Apple from building its own search engine, undercutting claims Apple had promised not to compete with Google in search—a major but narrow win for Apple. The aggrieved party, California Crane School, is pressing for a rehearing, arguing that new evidence from the Department of Justice’s separate case against Google changes things, but that’s still pending and seems a longshot given the appellate court’s skepticism.

    For the Department of Justice, momentum is mixed. In a parallel antitrust case targeting Google’s ad tech business, the Department of Justice scored a win earlier this year when a federal judge ruled Google monopolized key advertising tools, but the same judge stopped short of forcing Google to sell its Chrome browser or unwind all its default search deals, including those with Apple. That partial result is informing strategy in the Apple litigation, where the Department of Justice argues structural remedies—such as breaking up entrenched agreements—may be the only way to restore true competition in markets long dominated by a handful of tech giants.

    In terms of outcome projections, legal analysts say it’s tough to call: Apple still holds several procedural advantages and the courts so far have demanded specific, well-documented evidence of a conspiracy or unfair exclusion, which can be a high bar. However, the Biden Department of Justice has signaled a willingness to keep pressing large-scale, systemic antitrust cases, suggesting Apple may be in for a protracted legal fight. The broader impact, if the Department of Justice prevails, could be a wave of industry reform—more open platforms, better access and pricing for developers and advertisers, and a shake-up in how tech firms structure search and ad deals. That would not just alter the competitive field for Google and Apple, but could shift the digital economy for years to come.

    On the flip side, if Apple emerges largely unscathed, it will reinforce the current model where dominant platforms can reach powerful commercial arrangements without immediate antitrust repercussions, likely meaning less change for users in the short term and putting more pressure on legislators, rather than courts, to act.

    The next big events in this legal saga are expected over the coming weeks as Apple, the Department of Justice, and affected third parties await possible rehearing decisions and continue to jockey for position in and out of courtrooms. This is an antitrust showdown with high stakes and no guaranteed winner yet, but the pressure is clearly growing for Apple to defend not just its business decisions, but the foundations of how it operates—and who gets to compete—across today’s tech ecosystem.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Show More Show Less
    5 mins
  • "Battle Intensifies: DoJ Gains Support in Antitrust Case Against Apple's Smartphone Dominance"

    "Battle Intensifies: DoJ Gains Support in Antitrust Case Against Apple's Smartphone Dominance"
    Sep 18 2025
    The antitrust battle between the United States Department of Justice and Apple has heated up in the past week, with several notable developments. On Tuesday, September sixteenth, the Department of Justice made news by picking up support from four additional states: Indiana, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Washington. That brings the coalition up to twenty, reflecting intensifying scrutiny of Apple’s business practices in the smartphone market, especially around how it handles its App Store and device ecosystem.

    Jonathan Kanter, Assistant Attorney General of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division, reaffirmed that the department, backed by its state partners, is focused on restoring competition that it argues Apple has stifled. The lawsuit centers on five main allegations. The Department of Justice claims Apple restricts so-called super apps that might challenge its platform, puts tight limits on game-streaming services, blocks cross-platform messaging apps to keep users dependent on the iPhone, limits integrations for non-Apple wearables, and prevents competitors from accessing hardware needed for digital wallets.

    Recent filings reveal that friction is increasing between the two sides. The Department of Justice says Apple is stalling discovery by withholding human resources records and other key business data, arguing for secrecy or privacy, while rival tech giants like Google have allowed broader access in similar lawsuits. The department wants Apple to hand over data and expand document custodians to match the scale of other antitrust cases but reports that Apple has only provided a small fraction of useful material compared to what is needed.

    The judge presiding over the case, Judge Wettre, may soon have to decide whether to compel Apple to cooperate more fully or side with Apple’s privacy stance. The Department of Justice has requested Apple produce its source code and global data by Friday, September nineteenth, raising the stakes for compliance.

    For Apple, the legal pressure is only one piece of a complex puzzle. Eddy Cue, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Services, played an important role in defending the company’s search partnership with Google in a related antitrust suit, a decision from which gave Apple some breathing room as the judge preserved a pivotal annual revenue stream. However, the latest ruling also banned exclusive contracts, opening up the possibility for more players entering default search slots on Apple’s devices down the road.

    On the Department of Justice side, Jonathan Kanter and Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater are in the spotlight, with Slater recently giving a high-profile keynote at Georgetown Law’s antitrust symposium and signaling that the department considers technology platform cases a priority for global standards.

    So far, neither side can claim a major win in this specific case. Apple has avoided a damaging injunction, but is losing ground as the Department of Justice consolidates state support. If forced to open up earlier, more candid access and alter its business practices, Apple could face significant changes to how apps, hardware, and messaging services work on its devices.

    Industry insiders are watching closely. A ruling against Apple could force broader access for developers and accessory makers, making it easier for users to mix platforms or switch phones. It could also impact digital wallets and future fintech integrations, which hinge on access to Apple’s near-field communications chips and APIs.

    The outcome of this fight could reshape how tech giants control mobile ecosystems, influence app development, and affect consumer choices for years to come. As the pace picks up in court, both Apple and the Department of Justice face mounting pressure, and the broader technology industry is bracing for the ripple effects of whichever way the judge calls it.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins
  • "Apple Dodges Justice Department Bullet in Landmark Antitrust Case"

    "Apple Dodges Justice Department Bullet in Landmark Antitrust Case"
    Sep 11 2025
    The United States Department of Justice’s antitrust case against Apple has moved rapidly in recent days, riding a wave of momentum from both domestic rulings and related global developments. On Tuesday, September ninth, Apple’s stock jumped after a federal judge in the Google search case preserved Google’s revenue-sharing arrangement with Apple, viewed as a ‘monster win’ for Apple and its investors because it secures a stream of roughly twenty billion dollars a year to Apple’s services revenue. The ruling kept Apple out of immediate regulatory fire and was cheered by the markets.

    This decision is also significant for Apple’s antitrust exposure, because it underscores how the courts are so far rejecting some of the Department of Justice’s most aggressive demands. The Justice Department, now led by Attorney General Merrick Garland and, on the antitrust front, Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater, has called for bold solutions—sometimes even a forced breakup or restructuring of dominant tech firms. However, the courts have so far favored more incremental remedies, focusing on targeted behavioral restrictions on firms like Google while upholding key business partnerships like those between Google and Apple.

    On the Apple front, the Department of Justice recently filed suit claiming Apple leverages its premium smartphone dominance, especially in app store policy and distribution, to create unfair barriers for app developers and limit consumer choice. Apple has faced other legal setbacks: in Australia, on August thirteenth, a federal court found both Apple and Google violated competition law regarding app stores, and a United States court found Apple in contempt over previous app store-related injunctions—Apple is appealing that order, with a major class action lawsuit set for trial in February two thousand twenty-six.

    Top Apple executive Eddy Cue, senior vice president of services, recently played a pivotal role by testifying that the Google-Apple search deal benefits users by delivering higher-quality, privacy-respecting search results. This testimony was widely credited with influencing the court’s decision to let those payments continue.

    While Apple celebrated a big win last week by keeping the search deal intact, the company is not out of the regulatory woods. The case highlights the growing tension between the United States Department of Justice and the largest technology companies, with new enforcement task forces being announced by top Department of Justice officials to address what they call “gamesmanship” and obstruction during antitrust investigations.

    If the Department of Justice does succeed in forcing Apple to loosen its app store policies or allow more third-party software access, it could dramatically reshape the app economy—not just for Apple but for developers and users worldwide. Industry experts say the recent Google decision signals that the courts are hesitant to force radical structural change unless there is overwhelming evidence of consumer harm, preferring remedies that maintain stability within the tech ecosystem.

    For now, both sides are claiming partial victories—the Department of Justice keeps the pressure on and wins some procedural fights, while Apple escapes the most damaging immediate penalties and continues to build partnerships, especially around artificial intelligence with both Google Gemini and ChatGPT rumored as future search options in its products. The ultimate outcome—for Apple and the broader tech sector—remains uncertain, but pressure on Apple’s walled garden is rising and the regulatory winds in Washington are blowing stronger than ever.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins