DOJ versus Apple - iSue the iPhone cover art

DOJ versus Apple - iSue the iPhone

DOJ versus Apple - iSue the iPhone

By: Inception Point Ai
Listen for free

About this listen

 The Department of Justice takes on the tech titan. Join us as we break down the landmark antitrust lawsuit against Apple, exploring allegations of monopolistic practices, unfair competition, and the future of the smartphone market.Copyright 2025 Inception Point Ai Politics & Government
Episodes
  • Ninth Circuit Deals Blow to Apple in Epic Games Clash, Upholding Contempt Ruling

    Ninth Circuit Deals Blow to Apple in Epic Games Clash, Upholding Contempt Ruling
    Dec 18 2025
    On December 11, 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals handed Apple a mixed ruling in its long-running battle with Epic Games over App Store practices, affirming a lower court's finding that Apple violated an injunction but reversing parts of the sanctions as overbroad[1]. The three-judge panel, led by Circuit Judge Milan D. Smith Junior, upheld civil contempt against Apple for designing workarounds that blocked developers from easily steering iPhone users to outside purchases, like adding links or buttons without facing steep commissions up to twenty-seven percent[1].

    In a key win for Epic, the appeals court said clear evidence showed Apple acted in bad faith, hiding its decision-making and picking the most anticompetitive options to cling to revenue, even after claiming compliance back in early 2024[1]. The lower court, under Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, had nailed Apple in April for this, ordering tighter rules and even referring Apple and one executive for a criminal probe, which the Ninth Circuit left intact[1]. But Apple scored points too: the panel tossed the ban on commissions for off-app buys as not a proper contempt fix, sent the case back for tweaks to overly broad restrictions, and rejected Apple's push to scrap the whole injunction despite newer court rulings elsewhere[1].

    This Epic-Apple clash ties into broader pressure on the tech giant, though the U.S. Department of Justice's separate blockbuster lawsuit accusing Apple of illegally monopolizing smartphones has seen no major rulings in the past few days. On December 17, the DOJ filed a statement of interest in a private antitrust suit mirroring its claims, urging a New Jersey federal judge to shoot down Apple's bid to dismiss arguments over Apple Watch restrictions that lock out rivals[2]. No names of lead DOJ lawyers popped up in fresh filings, but the move signals Washington's ongoing heat on Apple's closed ecosystem.

    Apple's side stays mum on personnel shifts amid the fights, with no recent news on executives like services chief Eddy Cue, who's tangled in related depositions before. Analysts see the Ninth Circuit decision as a loss for Apple that could force friendlier developer links by mid-2026, potentially costing billions if commissions dip, but the remand gives breathing room to narrow penalties[1][3].

    Industry watchers say a full DOJ win might crack open iPhone repairs, payments, and cloud gaming, hitting Apple's one hundred billion dollar services haul and boosting rivals like Spotify or Google, though appeals could drag to 2027 or beyond[3]. For everyday folks, it means possibly cheaper apps and more choices down the line, without upending your iPhone tomorrow. The appeals court shut down Apple's free speech and property rights gripes, calling the fixes lawful and no price controls[1]. Expect more skirmishes, as Epic pushes enforcement and Apple refines its appeal strategy.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • "Civil Rights Groups Sue DOJ, DHS Over Alleged Pressure on Tech Firms to Remove Immigration Apps"

    "Civil Rights Groups Sue DOJ, DHS Over Alleged Pressure on Tech Firms to Remove Immigration Apps"
    Nov 27 2025
    I need to let you know that based on the search results provided, there isn't current information about a Department of Justice suit against Apple from the past few days.

    The most recent development in my search results involves the Electronic Frontier Foundation filing a lawsuit against the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security, not the other way around. This lawsuit, filed on November twenty-first, seeks to understand whether federal officials unconstitutionally pressured Apple, Google, and Meta to remove immigration tracking apps.

    The case centers on Apple's October removal of an app called ICEBlock, which allowed users to report Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities in their communities. Attorney General Pam Bondi publicly credited the government's efforts in getting Apple to take down the app, citing safety concerns and claims that it put law enforcement at risk.

    What you may be thinking of is Apple's involvement in this controversy, but the legal action is being brought against the government by civil rights advocates, not by the government against Apple. The Electronic Frontier Foundation wants access to communications between federal agencies and tech companies to determine if First Amendment violations occurred.

    If you're looking for information about a different Department of Justice suit against Apple, I would need updated search results to provide you with accurate reporting. Could you clarify which specific case you're interested in learning about?

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Show More Show Less
    2 mins
  • "Apple Battles DOJ in Landmark Antitrust Lawsuit, Trial Looming in 2027"

    "Apple Battles DOJ in Landmark Antitrust Lawsuit, Trial Looming in 2027"
    Nov 20 2025
    The Department of Justice’s antitrust lawsuit against Apple is moving forward, with no trial date set yet but deadlines for exchanging information stretching into early two thousand twenty seven. The DOJ and a coalition of states allege Apple stifles competition by restricting app makers and third party device manufacturers, keeping iPhone users locked into its ecosystem. Apple’s bid to dismiss the case was rejected in June, a significant loss for the company.

    In recent days, there has been no major new ruling or development in the Apple case itself, but the broader antitrust landscape for Big Tech has seen important shifts. Last week, a federal judge ruled against the Federal Trade Commission in its antitrust suit against Meta, declining to force the company to spin off WhatsApp and Instagram. That decision is seen as a major win for Meta and could influence how courts approach similar cases, including the one against Apple.

    Apple’s legal team continues to prepare for a protracted battle. The company’s CEO, Tim Cook, has not made public statements specifically about the DOJ lawsuit in the past few days, but Apple’s general counsel has reiterated the company’s position that its practices benefit consumers and foster innovation.

    On the DOJ side, officials are focused on building their case, with key figures including Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter leading the antitrust division. Kanter has been vocal about the need to rein in Big Tech’s power, but recent setbacks in the Meta case may prompt a reassessment of strategy.

    Industry experts say the outcome of the Apple case could have wide ranging effects. If the DOJ prevails, it could force Apple to open up its App Store and allow more competition in digital wallets, messaging, and other services. If Apple wins, it could set a precedent that makes it harder for regulators to challenge the practices of dominant tech companies.

    For now, both sides are gathering evidence and preparing for what could be a landmark trial in two thousand twenty seven. The case remains a focal point in the debate over how much control tech giants should have over the digital marketplace.

    Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs

    For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai

    This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.