
The Lead Podcast - Episode 108: A Discussion of LBBAP compared with biventricular pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy...
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
This global, multicenter registry included 2,579 CRT recipients with LVEF ≤ 50% who underwent either LBBAP or conventional biventricular pacing (BVP), with 780 matched pairs analyzed. Over a mean follow-up of 34 ± 15 months, LBBAP significantly reduced the combined endpoint of all-cause death or first heart failure hospitalization (22.2% vs 30.8%; HR 0.81; P≈0.048), largely driven by fewer HF hospitalizations (13.6% vs 20.8%; HR 0.63; P<0.001). Patients in the LBBAP arm also experienced shorter paced QRS duration (129 vs 143 ms) and fewer procedural complications (3.5% vs 6.5%; P=0.004). Mortality rates were similar between groups, reinforcing LBBAP's safety and potential efficacy for CRT in this patient population.
Join host Michael S. Lloyd, MD, FHRS and guests Hakeem Ayinde, MD, FHRS, and Prashant Bhave, MD, FHRS for this discussion, recorded at Heart Rhythm 2025 in San Diego, California.
https://www.hrsonline.org/education/TheLead
https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271%2825%2902312-4/abstract?utm
Host Disclosure(s):
M. Lloyd:
Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting: Medtronic, Arga Medtech, Circa Scientific
Membership on Advisory Committees: Boston Scientific
Contributor Disclosure(s):
H. Ayinde:
Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting: Johnson and Johnson
P. Bhave:
Honoraria/Speaking/Consulting: American Collge of Cardiology, Boston Scientific, Abbott Medical