Episodes

  • The Future Of Drug Discovery Is 4 Billion Years Old (Viswa Colluru, Founder & CEO at Enveda)
    Apr 21 2026

    For decades, drug discovery has shifted away from nature and toward biology-first approaches. Viswa Colluru believes that shift was a catastrophic mistake. His company, Enveda Biosciences, has raised over $500 million to build a “search engine for nature’s chemistry.” The mission is personal: he grew up around his father’s pharmacy in India and later lost his mother to a treatable cancer whose medicine his family couldn’t afford. Many life-changing medicines, including morphine, aspirin, and metformin, originated in nature, but there has never been a reliable, scalable way to systematically explore its chemistry. Colluru founded Enveda in 2019 with $55,000 of his own savings to change that. The company has since identified 18 drug candidates, with three now in clinical trials.


    In our conversation, we explore:

    • Why the pharmaceutical industry abandoned nature (and why that was a massive mistake)
    • How Enveda built a system to decode unknown molecules in nature
    • The deeply personal story of his mother’s battle with leukemia and how it shaped his life’s work
    • Why old ideas, from immunotherapy to natural products, often hold the most latent potential
    • How Enveda developed 18 drug candidates for about $1 million each instead of $10-15 million
    • Enveda’s three leading drug candidates targeting eczema, obesity, and ulcerative colitis
    • Why first-in-class medicines capture the vast majority of returns in pharma
    • What competitive table tennis taught him about building companies

    Thank you to the partners who make this possible

    Brex: The intelligent finance platform.

    Ahrefs Brand Radar: Find your brand in AI results.

    Persona: Trusted identity verification for any use case.

    Timestamps

    (00:00) Introduction to Viswa Colluru

    (03:57) His father’s pharmacy and early exposure to Western and Ayurvedic medicine

    (07:06) Early pull toward technology

    (09:29) His mother’s leukemia diagnosis

    (14:24) Studying Biotechnology

    (16:07) Graduate school

    (17:55) Studying immunotherapy when it was unfashionable

    (24:23) Innovation vs. novelty

    (27:24) Lessons from table tennis

    (32:05) Joining Recursion

    (37:10) Learning urgency and courage

    (40:42) What launched Enveda

    (45:40) The limits of reductionist drug discovery

    (49:53) Chemistry-first approach

    (52:17) Raising $225K and investing $55K personally

    (56:04) Initial studies and targets

    (1:04:30) Three categories of leading drugs: Eczema, obesity, ulcerative colitis

    (1:13:27) Why GLP-1s are not the whole answer

    (1:18:27) Enveda’s long-term vision

    (1:21:31) Book recommendation

    Follow Viswa Colluru

    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/viswacolluru

    X: https://x.com/viswacolluru

    Resources and episode mentions: https://www.generalist.com/p/the-future-of-drug-discovery

    Production and marketing by penname.co. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.

    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 23 mins
  • How a 20-Person Startup Won Gold at the Math Olympiad—Tying With OpenAI & DeepMind (Tudor Achim, CEO of Harmonic)
    Apr 14 2026

    Tudor Achim is the co-founder and CEO of Harmonic, a startup working to solve one of AI’s hardest problems: mathematical reasoning. In July 2024, Harmonic achieved gold-medal-level performance on International Math Olympiad problems alongside systems from OpenAI and Google DeepMind—but with a key difference: every proof Harmonic submitted was formally verified. Tudor's path to Harmonic wound through competitive piano, computational biology, and autonomous driving. He studied at Carnegie Mellon's music preparatory school, worked on machine learning at Quora, briefly pursued a PhD before dropping out, and then co-founded an autonomous driving company, Helm.ai. Harmonic's core product, Aristotle, uses reinforcement learning and the programming language Lean 4 to solve problems and verify solutions.


    In our conversation, we explore:

    • Why Tudor believes math is the fundamental toolkit to understand the world
    • How Harmonic uses hallucinations as a feature, not a bug
    • How Aristotle works and the applications beyond pure mathematics
    • The reinforcement learning process that lets Harmonic generate synthetic training data and solve problems humans have never attempted
    • Why Tudor believes AI could surpass human mathematicians on specific tasks within 2–3 years
    • Why the future of mathematics looks more like GitHub than academic journals
    • The alternating pattern between intellect leaps and data leaps throughout scientific history
    • How studying piano under an extraordinary teacher taught Tudor discipline and the value of sticking with hard problems

    Thank you to the partners who make this possible

    Brex: The intelligent finance platform.

    Guru: The AI source of truth for work.

    Rippling: Stop wasting time on admin tasks, build your startup faster.

    Transcript: https://www.generalist.com/p/how-a-20-person-startup-won-gold

    Timestamps

    (00:00) Intro

    (03:34) From competitive piano to computer science

    (06:28) The mathematical foundations of music (and why Tudor keeps them separate)

    (08:24) Can AI ever create art with true intent?

    (09:51) Early obsessions

    (12:52) Defining intelligence

    (14:49) Discovering machine learning’s potential at Quora

    (17:30) Why Tudor chose computational biology for his PhD

    (19:19) The decision to drop out and build Helm.ai

    (22:55) The two breakthroughs that made mathematical AI possible in 2023

    (25:28) The importance of Lean 4

    (28:21) How Tudor and Vlad Tenev discovered they shared the same impossible dream

    (32:35) Why formal verification became the core conviction

    (34:21) The timeline for AI surpassing human mathematicians

    (35:25) An overview of Aristotle: the world’s first always-correct mathematical agent

    (38:12) Why Tudor says hallucinations are the engine of creativity

    (39:30) The translation challenge from natural language to formal proof

    (40:40) Reinforcement learning

    (42:10) Why Aristotle is both faster and cheaper than alternatives

    (43:34) Tradeoffs and use cases

    (45:34) Math in AI now and what’s next

    (47:38) Tying with OpenAI and DeepMind at the International Math Olympiad

    (49:08) Democratizing AI and correctness

    (53:13) Tudor’s 2030 thesis

    (56:02) History’s alternating rhythm of thinking and measuring

    (57:53) What Tudor has been wrong about

    (58:52) What Tudor’s best at

    (1:00:18) Final meditations

    Follow Tudor Achim

    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tudorachim

    X: https://x.com/tachim/with_replies

    Resources and episode mentions: https://www.generalist.com/p/how-a-20-person-startup-won-gold⁠

    Production and marketing by penname.co. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.

    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 5 mins
  • 30% Of Network Engineers Are Retiring. What Happens Next? (Anil Varanasi, Co-Founder & CEO of Meter)
    Apr 7 2026
    Anil Varanasi, co-founder and CEO of Meter, is building a new kind of networking company for the AI era. Alongside his brother Sunil, he has helped raise more than $250 million to challenge incumbents like Cisco with a vertically integrated approach spanning hardware, software, deployment, and ongoing operations, all delivered through a utility-style model. His view is that networking has remained largely unchanged for decades, even as it has become foundational to everything from AI workloads to real-world infrastructure. Meter’s ambition is not just to improve existing networks, but to make them autonomous over time. Before starting the company, Anil and Sunil were deeply involved in filmmaking, a background that still shapes their philosophy of building with cathedral-level craft across every layer of the stack.Together we explore:The “burden of knowledge” and why progress is getting harder across fieldsWhy most companies over-index on technology and ignore business model innovationThe three ways companies create advantage: technology, delivery, and business modelHow Meter’s trade-in model borrows from the automotive industryWhy networking should function like electricity or water—not hardwareLessons from Japanese vending machine logistics for infrastructure deploymentThe hidden coordination problem behind vertically integrated companiesWhy Anil believes “common knowledge” is often wrongHow COVID forced Meter to abandon geographic constraints and scale nationallyThe case for fully autonomous networks in a world of exploding demand—Thank you to the partners who make this possible.tech domains: An identity for builders at their core.Granola: The app that might actually make you love meetings.Brex: The intelligent finance platform.—Transcript: https://www.generalist.com/p/the-case-for-autonomous-networks—Timestamps(00:00) Introduction to Anil Varanasi and Meter(03:52) The burden of knowledge and slowing innovation(08:18) Losing creativity vs gaining expertise(10:25) What Meter actually does(13:26) Early life, immigration, and upbringing(15:47) Parental influence(20:03) Film, storytelling, and creative influence(22:55) Why Anil didn’t pursue filmmaking(25:44) Parallels between company building and filmmaking(27:00) Early programming and building(28:05) George Mason and understanding systems(29:59) The dynamic of working with his brother as a co-founder(34:03) His first business and lessons learned (or lack thereof)(35:15) Lessons from successful companies(38:16) Japanese vending machines and logistics insight(41:10) Scrapping 18 months of work(42:40) Conviction and long-term company building(46:02) COVID shock and near-death moment(49:59) Building hardware like a cathedral(52:25) Rethinking the networking business model(57:06) Build vs buy and transaction costs(59:39) Networking as infrastructure and utility(01:01:30) The case for autonomous networks(01:03:25) Hiring, talent, and what actually matters(01:06:15) Big unanswered questions (sleep, science)(01:07:28) Rethinking education(01:09:02) Infinite games and long-term thinking—Follow Anil VaranasiLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anilcvX: https://x.com/acvWebsite: https://anilv.com—Resources and episode mentions: https://www.generalist.com/p/the-case-for-autonomous-networks⁠—Production and marketing by penname.co. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 11 mins
  • Why One Superintelligence Is More Dangerous Than a Thousand (Vincent Weisser, CEO & Co-Founder of Prime Intellect)
    Mar 24 2026
    Much of the fear around AI centers on misalignment – the idea that powerful systems might act against human interests. Vincent Weisser worries about something different: what happens if advanced AI systems are perfectly aligned with the interests of a small group of institutions? That concern led him to co-found Prime Intellect, a startup building open infrastructure for training and deploying advanced AI models. Before Prime Intellect, Weisser helped organize Vitalik Buterin’s Zuzalu experiment and worked in decentralized science, where he helped unlock roughly $40 million in funding for unconventional research. Today, he’s applying that same open ethos to AI, working to ensure the tools that shape superintelligence remain broadly accessible rather than concentrated in the hands of a few.—In our conversation, we explore:Why Vincent believes multiple superintelligences are safer than oneThe intellectual influences that shaped Vincent’s thinking about intelligence and progress, including David Deutsch and Nick BostromPrime Intellect’s evolution from distributed compute infrastructure to frontier model training and reinforcement learning toolsWhy Vincent believes open and decentralized science could accelerate discoveryThe Zuzalu experiment and what it suggests about the future of scientific communitiesThe role of aesthetics and craft in building technologyWhy Europe might have a cultural advantage in a post-superintelligence worldVincent’s predictions for the next five years of AI—Thank you to the partners who make this possibleGranola: The app that might actually make you love meetings.Brex: The intelligent finance platform.Rippling: Stop wasting time on admin tasks, build your startup faster.—Transcript: https://www.generalist.com/p/why-one-superintelligence-is-more—Timestamps(00:00) Introduction to Vincent Weisser(03:28) The book behind Prime Intellect’s name(07:35) The case for suffering(09:35) An overview of Prime Intellect(13:03) Why open source models matter(21:18) Vincent’s intellectual influences(25:17) Early years in the startup scene(31:48) Funding science outside traditional institutions(41:22) The past 6 months of AI progress(43:45) Deciding to build Prime Intellect(46:55) Why GPUs were the right starting point(51:39) Training models on Prime Intellect(59:48) Why beauty matters(1:03:48) The Zuzalu experiment(1:06:27) Prime Intellect’s AGI Easter egg(1:11:13) Predictions for the next five years(1:15:09) Final meditations—Follow Vincent WeisserLinkedIn: https://linkedin.com/in/vincentweisserX: https://x.com/vincentweisserGoodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/69248416-vincent-weisserWebsite: https://primeintellect.ai—Resources and episode mentions: https://www.generalist.com/p/why-one-superintelligence-is-more⁠—Production and marketing by penname.co. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 19 mins
  • Why Robots Still Struggle With Simple Tasks (And What Might Finally Change That) | Karol Hausman, Co-Founder & CEO of Physical Intelligence
    Mar 17 2026

    Karol Hausman is the co-founder and CEO of Physical Intelligence, a robotics company building a general-purpose “AI brain for the physical world.” The company has raised more than $1 billion in funding to develop foundation models that allow robots to operate across many machines, environments, and tasks rather than being programmed for a single purpose. The core thesis: the same scaling dynamics that transformed language models may also unlock robotic intelligence. But only if you resist every commercial pressure pushing you toward specialization. The central challenge isn’t mechanical design. It’s intelligence: how robots learn, generalize, and interact with a physical world that is far harder to simulate than it is to describe. Before launching Physical Intelligence, Karol worked at Google Brain and Stanford University, studying robot learning alongside researchers Sergey Levine and Chelsea Finn, who later became his co-founders.


    In our conversation, we explore:

    • How growing up in a small town in Poland and watching Star Wars sparked Karol’s fascination with robots
    • The moment a lecture from Sergey Levine convinced him to abandon his PhD research direction and pivot fully to deep learning
    • Why robotics has historically lagged behind breakthroughs in language models
    • The case for building a general “AI brain” for the physical world rather than a single specialized robot
    • The role of real-world data in training robots, the limits of simulation, and how deployment could create a powerful data flywheel
    • The return of reinforcement learning and the parallels between human learning and robot training
    • The unique challenges of physical intelligence and why robots must operate with far higher reliability than language models

    Thank you to the partners who make this possible

    Brex: The intelligent finance platform.

    Granola: The app that might actually make you love meetings.

    Transcript: https://www.generalist.com/p/karol-hausman-physical-intelligence

    Timestamps

    (00:00) Intro

    (04:05) Karol’s early fascination with robots

    (07:38) How Karol relates to Fei-Fei Li’s biography

    (08:52) What inspired Karol to build better robots

    (11:19) Philosophical influences

    (15:33) Parallels between The Inner Game of Tennis and robotics

    (18:21) Karol’s entry point to robotics and PhD program

    (25:49) Combining robotics with LLMs: The Taylor Swift demo

    (30:48) The 1970s SHRDLU AI experiment

    (32:33) Founding Physical Intelligence

    (35:13) How Lachy Groom got involved

    (39:40) How research shapes what Physical Intelligence builds

    (45:22) The importance of real-world data

    (49:07) The return of reinforcement learning in robotics

    (53:31) The risk of commercializing too early

    (55:47) Finding the right partners for the business

    (57:13) Open research questions

    (1:00:00) NVIDIA’s simulation engines

    (1:01:57) The surprising speed of progress

    (1:04:16) Reliability in robotics

    (1:07:31) Compensating for missing senses

    (1:12:28) Book recommendation

    Follow Karol Hausman

    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/karolhausman

    X: https://x.com/hausman_k

    Resources and episode mentions: https://www.generalist.com/p/karol-hausman-physical-intelligence

    Production and marketing by penname.co. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.

    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 14 mins
  • America’s Electric Power Grid Is Broken. This Startup Is Trying to Fix It. (Zach Dell, co-founder & CEO of Base)
    Mar 10 2026

    For decades, America’s electrical system has rewarded utilities for building more infrastructure, not for lowering costs. The result is a grid that expanded but rarely improved. Zach Dell, co-founder and CEO of Base, is building a different kind of power company. In under three years, Base has grown into a vertically integrated business valued in the billions. It combines home batteries and software to store electricity when it is cheap and deliver it when demand spikes. Dell’s interest in energy began long before Base. In college, he tried to lease a Hawaiian lava field for a solar project. He also experimented with anaerobic digestion systems in India and worked at Blackstone and Thrive Capital, where he met his co-founder. His bet is simple but ambitious: the next phase of the grid will come from increasing utilization rather than constantly building new infrastructure.


    In our conversation, we explore:

    • How a failed college solar project and early energy experiments in India pulled Zach into the power industry
    • The lessons he absorbed from his parents, including truth-seeking, reinvention, and competitive endurance
    • How the U.S. grid’s regulatory structure discourages innovation and why Texas’s deregulated market creates space for new power companies
    • Why batteries are best understood as a time-shifting technology that increases grid utilization and reduces total system costs, not simply as energy generators
    • Base’s “make, move, store, sell” framework for thinking about the full power stack
    • How Base aims to become the first beloved energy company
    • How Zach identified Justin as a world-class operator and built the trust needed to go all-in together on a non-obvious idea
    • How aggressive AI adoption is compressing cycle times and why slow adopters risk falling behind

    Thank you to the partners who make this possible

    Granola: The app that might actually make you love meetings

    Brex: The intelligent finance platform.

    Transcript: https://www.generalist.com/p/americas-electric-power-grid-is-broken⁠

    Timestamps

    (00:00) Introduction to Zach Dell and Base

    (02:08) The Hawaiian lava field solar project and early energy curiosity

    (07:03) Investing vs. operating

    (09:31) Lessons from Phil Jackson on aligning talented teams

    (14:27) Lessons from his parents

    (18:20) The loneliness of solo founding and the value of co-founders

    (23:45) Justin’s strengths as a co-founder and how their partnership formed

    (29:55) Why Base became the obvious focus

    (32:08) The original vision and the three reversals

    (34:58) The US power grid and what makes Texas different

    (39:19) Why batteries matter and what Base is building

    (41:12) How Base works in two market types

    (45:10) Base’s core product

    (46:50) The software behind Base’s battery network

    (48:20) Base’s partnerships with battery cell makers

    (49:51) The Gen 2 hardware mistake and the lesson in risk management

    (51:08) Dino’s strengths as Head of Hardware

    (52:36) Base’s positioning as grid infrastructure

    (53:29) Building a beloved energy brand

    (58:01) How hiring at Base has evolved

    (1:01:10) AI workflows at Base

    (1:03:00) Zach’s dedicated deep work time

    (1:05:54) Final meditations

    Follow Zach Dell

    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/zach-dell-a631a554

    X: https://x.com/ZachBDell

    Resources and episode mentions: https://www.generalist.com/p/americas-electric-power-grid-is-broken

    Production and marketing by penname.co. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.

    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 12 mins
  • Everyone Is Betting on Bigger LLMs. She's Betting They're Fundamentally Wrong. (Eve Bodnia, Founder & CEO of Logical Intelligence)
    Feb 24 2026
    Eve Bodnia is the co-founder and CEO of Logical Intelligence, which is developing energy-based reasoning models (EBMs) as an alternative to large language models. She argues that LLMs, which operate by recognizing and recombining patterns within language space, are structurally incapable of genuine reasoning. Eve's alternative: Kona — an EBM that reasons in abstract latent space, learns rules about the world rather than surface patterns, and can interface with language models as one output channel among many. Eve traces the core ideas behind her architecture to decades of work in symmetry groups, condensed matter physics, and brain science — fields that share, as she explains, the same underlying mathematics. In a public demo, Kona solved a complex reasoning task for roughly $4 in compute, compared to an estimated $15,000 using frontier LLMs. With Yann LeCun serving as founding chair of its technical board, Logical Intelligence sits at the center of a small but growing effort to rethink AI beyond language-based models.In our conversation, we explore:Why Eve believes LLMs can’t truly extrapolate knowledge, even at larger scaleWhat energy-based reasoning models are—and where the “energy” concept comes fromThe $4 vs. $15,000 benchmark, and what it tells us about the cost of guessing vs. knowingHow Logical Intelligence showed spontaneous knowledge transfer at just 16M parametersWhy systems like chip design, surgical robotics, and power grids need more than probabilistic AIWhat formally verified code generation means for the future of programmingWhy the math behind particle physics also explains how the brain filters signal from noiseHow meeting Grigori Perelman as a teenager shaped Eve’s views on ego and ownership in scienceWhy Eve believes humans must remain the constraint-setters in advanced AIHow meditation, piano, and Eastern philosophy support her creative process—Thank you to the partners who make this possibleGranola: The app that might actually make you love meetings.Persona: Trusted identity verification for any use case.—Transcript: https://www.generalist.com/p/everyone-is-betting-on-bigger-llms—Timestamps(00:00) Introduction(03:03) Eve’s encounter with Grigori Perelman(05:38) Why bizarre people are Eve’s favorite people(06:56) Her early obsession with math and physics(09:02) The manifold hypothesis and language(11:54) The Kekulé Problem(14:05) Eve’s upbringing and her CERN research in high school(17:40) Eve’s academic path(20:36) Symmetry in nature(22:58) Spirituality and creativity(27:00) Theory vs. experiment(29:03) Uncovering a critical gap in AI models(33:45) What Logical Intelligence is building(35:50) Logical Intelligence’s use cases(42:08) Energy-based models explained(45:06) LLMs vs. EBMs(48:01) AGI defined(51:22) Kona’s knowledge extrapolation(53:20) The team behind Logical Intelligence(58:09) Early investors in Logical Intelligence(58:50) Feynman’s influence on Eve’s work(1:01:15) How Eve sustains her creativity(1:03:42) Final meditations—Follow Eve BodniaLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/eve-bodnia-351b41355X: https://x.com/evelovesoliveWebsite: https://logicalintelligence.com—Resources and episode mentions: https://www.generalist.com/p/everyone-is-betting-on-bigger-llms⁠—Production and marketing by penname.co. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 8 mins
  • How Bolt Survived An 85% Revenue Crash And Became Europe's Ride-Hailing Champion (Markus Villig, Founder & CEO)
    Feb 19 2026
    In 2013, on an Estonian island of just 10,000 residents, a teenager borrowed €5,000 from his parents and decided to take on Uber. Twelve years later, Markus Villig leads Bolt, a company operating in 50+ countries, generating nearly €3 billion in revenue, and standing as one of the only European tech companies competing at true global scale. Rather than going head-to-head with incumbents in their strongest markets, Bolt expanded through underserved cities, emerging economies, and overlooked segments of urban transport. When COVID erased 85% of its revenue in weeks, the company didn’t retreat; it staged a kind of corporate “eucatastrophe,” pivoting into food delivery across nearly 20 countries in what became a company-wide sprint. That same bias toward action now shapes Markus’s broader agenda: investing in defense tech for Estonia and Ukraine, pushing for capital markets reform, and advancing a contrarian thesis on autonomous vehicles.In this conversation, we discuss:How growing up in Soviet-occupied Estonia shaped Markus’s ambition and moral clarityHow Bolt’s European ethos and long-term focus on driver retention became a structural advantageThe marketplace models and capital discipline that allowed Bolt to outmaneuver better-funded rivalsWhy Bolt found breakout success in African markets after failing in 12 Western countriesThe 85% revenue collapse during COVID and the rapid food delivery pivot that reshaped the companyBolt’s partnerships with Stellantis and Pony.ai and its long-term bet on autonomous vehiclesWhy Ukrainian and Eastern European startups are often outperforming their Western peersMarkus’s blueprint for closing Europe’s tech deficit and building globally competitive companies—Thank you to the partners who make this possibleGranola: The app that might actually make you love meetingsBrex: The intelligent finance platform.Persona: Trusted identity verification for any use case.—Transcript: https://www.generalist.com/p/how-bolt-survived-an-85-revenue-crash—Timestamps(00:00) Intro(03:32) How The Lord of the Rings shaped Markus’s worldview(05:52) Bolt’s underdog story and its existential turning point(10:22) Estonia’s startup DNA and its imprint on Bolt(13:38) Europe’s ambition problem(17:23) Europe’s defense tech gap(23:09) The need for capital market reform in Europe(25:13) Bolt’s origin story(36:35) Frugality as strategy(38:24) What running Bolt actually demands(41:27) The hidden costs of being too lean(42:50) Bolt’s shift to experimentation(44:10) Bolt’s micromobility strategy(45:50) How Bolt found the right markets(50:44) The Serbian mob story(54:00) Markus on venture capital and lessons from Klarna’s board(55:40) Why Bolt never sold(57:08) Bolt’s autonomous vehicle (AV) strategy and key partnerships(1:05:50) The concept of culture-market fit(1:07:48) How Bolt operates: writing, hiring, reading, and more(1:13:15) Markus’s personal strengths(1:14:15) What people get wrong about business(1:16:27) Final meditations—Follow Markus VilligX: https://x.com/villigmLinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/markusvillig—Resources and episode mentions: https://www.generalist.com/p/how-bolt-survived-an-85-revenue-crash—Production and marketing by penname.co. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.
    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 20 mins