Augmented vs. Realists: Who Wins the Next Evolution?

Most people think the digital divide is about internet access, but the gap ahead could split humanity itself. This episode explores the rise of the Augmented—those who embrace enhancements to body and mind—and the Realists, who refuse or can’t afford to adapt.

The story begins with something as basic as access to computers in a public library, and stretches forward into a world of superhuman senses, embedded processors, and the terrifying potential of hackers breaking into not just your accounts, but your biology. From ethical dilemmas to survival questions, this episode examines whether the Realists will remain relevant—or become the underdogs of a new age.

Key Takeaways

• The digital divide today could foreshadow an even greater split in the future.
• Augmented humans may gain powers far beyond natural capabilities.
• Realists could be left behind socially, economically, and even physically.
• Hackers and security risks take on a life-or-death dimension in this future.
• Ethical boundaries shift with time, as once-unthinkable technologies become reality.

👉 More content. Less hassle. See what’s possible at FOMO.ai.

❓Top AI Marketing questions you wish you knew sooner

What does the term “Augmented” mean in this context?

It refers to humans who integrate advanced technology directly into their biology—enhancements like brain processors, artificial lenses, or muscle fibers that increase strength, speed, or perception. These upgrades create capabilities beyond natural human limits.

Who are the “Realists” in this future scenario?

Realists are those who choose not to adopt enhancements, or who can’t afford them. They stick to natural human abilities, often for ethical, financial, or cultural reasons. This could leave them at a disadvantage compared to the Augmented.

How does the digital divide relate to this topic?

The digital divide shows how access to technology already creates inequality today. If the gap in internet access can shape education and opportunity, the divide between Augmented and Realists could magnify that imbalance on a much larger scale.

What role does security play in an augmented future?

Security becomes critical, since cyberattacks could compromise not just data but people’s enhanced senses, strength, or even their lives. Cases like vulnerable pacemakers illustrate how real the risks already are.

Will governments regulate augmentation?

Most likely, but regulation might be limited or reactive. Ideas like mandatory “kill switches” for enhanced humans raise troubling questions about control, freedom, and who decides when that power is used.

Could Realists still play a role in society?

Yes. Just as in Asimov’s story “A Feeling of Power,” skills lost to technology may eventually prove valuable again. Realists might preserve abilities or perspectives that become useful when the Augmented face limits or vulnerabilities.

How fast could this future arrive?

Much sooner than people expect. Technologies once thought unthinkable—like gene editing in embryos—are already reality. Social acceptance often follows quickly after initial shock, accelerating adoption of change.

👉 Faster content, higher quality. Find out how at FOMO.ai.