The great flood of Noah. The book of Genesis records the lifespan of key individuals that lived on earth before the flood. It also accurately records when the flood occurred and the age of key individuals after the flood. While the age of those who lived before the flood averaged 900 years, the ages of those living after the flood dropped dramatically to 100-200 years within a few generations. How realistic are these lifespan records? Is there any evidence that supports these ages, along with a dramatic age reduction in a post-flood world scenario?

Check out our other podcasts:
studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

The great flood of Noah.The flood story tells us that humanity was destroyed by the floodwaters except for 8 people who were spared on the ark. These people multiplied and spread out over the earth after the flood. The Bible records the genealogies of the first generations to be born after the flood, and notes that at a certain point, they spread out extensively over the earth. Is the historical evidence for the founders and starting points of ancient nations consistent with the Biblical record?

Check out our other podcasts:
studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

The great flood of Noah.The Biblical flood story has been passed off as mythical by many. While there is no doubt that the story is miraculous, extra-biblical records of an ancient "flood story" are incredibly consistent with the Bible's account. These additional flood stories are found in cultures all over the world. What does all this mean for the story of a global flood? Is the story realistic? Is the historical evidence consistent?

Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts

Evidence for the flood. Fossils in sedimentary layers provide clues regarding the nature and dynamics of rock formation conditions. Fossil footprint trackways provide significant evidence for catastrophic conditions. They paint a picture of all kinds of animals fleeing to higher ground while wading through fast moving water. Polystrate fossil trees also point to a dramatic past. Stripped of their tops and roots, these logs floated in an upright position and were buried in the same orientation through multiple different layers of sediment. These logs often contain fossils of animals and sea creatures mixed together. All of this evidence is most consistent with a global catastropic flood...an event which even explains the Ice-Age!

Check out our other podcasts:
studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock layers lie conformably over each other, without evidence of erosion between them. This is the case even when the layers are unconventional. For example, entire sections of layers are missing in some locations, which represents gaps of tens to hundreds of millions of years, according to the conventional geologic column. Yet there is no evidence of erosion where the missing layers should be. In other instances, older rocks are situated on top of younger rocks, and do so over dozens of square kilometres. Once more, the layers sit perfectly over one another without surface disturbance. What explains this kind of evidence best? Long-age processes or a single global flood event?

Check out our other podcasts:
studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Evidence for the flood. Sedimentary rock makes up about 75% of the earth's surface - a type of rock primarily laid down by water. Sedimentary rock strata combinations have the same deposition patterns around the world. In addition, single, continuous, layers of sedimentary rock can cover areas stretching hundreds of thousands of square kilometres and contain numerous fossils. How did these rocks form? By small, local, catastrophic conditions or a single, global flood situation? If local and spread out over millions of years, why is there a distinct lack of erosion between rock layers?

Check out our other podcasts:
studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Fossil evidence for evolution. Many rock layers contain fossils of both extinct species and species that exist today. This presents a fascinating opportunity to see if the species alive today have evolved compared to their fossilised ancestors. Research examining this found no change between the species, despite the assumed age of the fossils being millions of years in the past. If evolution occurred and continues to occur, why haven't the species alive today changed dramatically?

Check out our other podcasts:
studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Fossil evidence for evolution. Certain rock layers contain numerous different fossilised organisms not found in the layers below them. Cambrian rock is a good example of this. Cambrian fossils are all fully-formed species - no intermediates. The layers underneath have no intermediates either, nor evidence of erosion which would suggest missing rock layers. The fully-formed species just suddenly appear in the so-called "Cambrian Explosion". Where are the intermediate fossils? What does this mean for evolution?

Check out our other podcasts:
studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts