"Landmark Antitrust Ruling: Apple Avoids Disruption, Google Curbed but Unbroken"
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
"Landmark Antitrust Ruling: Apple Avoids Disruption, Google Curbed but Unbroken"
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
The decision, made by District Judge Amit Mehta, found that Google had indeed violated the Sherman Act by holding an unlawful monopoly in the general search market. However, the judge rejected the most sweeping remedies proposed by the Department of Justice, including a forced breakup of Google’s Chrome browser and the Android operating system. Key for Apple, the court allowed Google to maintain its valuable search engine partnership with Apple on iOS devices, a deal that is reportedly worth more than twenty billion dollars annually for Apple.
Apple’s leadership, including Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook, has expressed relief at the ruling. In the aftermath, Apple’s stock price jumped by more than three percent in after-hours trading. This bounce reflects Wall Street’s view that Apple has avoided a major operational disruption and preserved a crucial revenue stream from its partnership with Google.
There were some restrictions: Google is now banned from entering into new exclusive search agreements with device makers and browsers, and it must share some search data with competitors to help foster competition. On the other hand, the court did not force Google to share advertising data or require the addition of user choice screens, which were among the stricter measures the Department of Justice had pushed for.
Although the decision recognizes Google’s monopoly power, it stops well short of the most drastic intervention. Both Apple and Google have signaled plans to appeal certain parts of the decision, which means this legal saga is not over yet. The ruling highlights the tricky position regulators are in: they need to address competition concerns without destabilizing key segments of the technology market.
For United States Attorney General Merrick Garland and others within the Justice Department’s leadership team, this outcome is mixed. The Department of Justice succeeded in proving some monopolistic behavior, but the imposed remedies were narrower than what they wanted.
Industry watchers are seeing this as a sign that antitrust enforcement in the tech sector may become more nuanced, with a shift toward fostering competition through methods like data sharing rather than breaking up companies. For Apple, this outcome means it can continue business as usual, maintain its partnership with Google, and avoid immediate changes or revenue loss. For the broader industry, the decision suggests regulators will focus on encouraging fair play without derailing the operations of dominant firms, at least for now.
Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs
For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.