BOMBSHELL: College Football Playoff's New 16 Team Format DESTROYS Big 12, Boosts SEC, Big 10, ESPN cover art

BOMBSHELL: College Football Playoff's New 16 Team Format DESTROYS Big 12, Boosts SEC, Big 10, ESPN

BOMBSHELL: College Football Playoff's New 16 Team Format DESTROYS Big 12, Boosts SEC, Big 10, ESPN

Listen for free

View show details

About this listen

 You're right, there's a growing movement and significant discussion around potentially expanding the College Football Playoff (CFP) to 16 teams, with a specific emphasis on automatic bids (AQ) for the power conferences, particularly the SEC and Big Ten.Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of this movement:The Push for Expansion:Dissatisfaction with 12-Team Format: While the 12-team format is new for the 2024 season, there's already a sense among some power brokers, particularly in the SEC and Big Ten, that it may not be the optimal long-term solution. Desire for More Representation: The SEC and Big Ten, boasting the most highly-ranked teams and perceived strength in depth, are reportedly pushing for a format that guarantees more spots for their conferences. Financial Incentives: A larger playoff field would likely generate even more revenue from television deals, further benefiting the participating conferences and institutions.The Proposed 16-Team Format:Multiple Automatic Bids: The central tenet of this movement is to allocate multiple automatic bids to the power conferences based on their perceived strength and number of quality teams. Four Autobids for SEC and Big Ten: The most frequently discussed model involves granting four automatic bids each to the SEC and the Big Ten. This would essentially guarantee a significant representation from these two conferences in the 16-team field. Two Autobids for ACC and Big 12: The ACC and Big 12 are often mentioned as receiving two automatic bids each under this model. One Autobid for Group of Five: A single automatic bid is typically proposed for the highest-ranked champion from the Group of Five conferences (Mountain West, American, Sun Belt, Conference USA, MAC).Remaining At-Large Bids: The remaining three spots in the 16-team field would be filled by at-large selections, presumably based on the CFP selection committee's rankings of the best remaining teams. Some discussions even suggest one of these at-large bids could be specifically for Notre Dame if they meet certain ranking criteria.Rationale Behind the Four Autobids for SEC and Big Ten:Perceived Dominance: Proponents argue that the SEC and Big Ten consistently field the largest number of elite teams and deserve greater representation to ensure the "best" teams are in the playoff. Maximizing Revenue: Guaranteeing more participation from the top brands in these conferences would likely drive higher television ratings and thus greater revenue.Regular Season Importance: The idea of "inner-league play-in games" at the end of the season has been floated, where teams within the conference would compete for these automatic bids, potentially increasing the significance of late-season matchups beyond just the conference championship game. For example, the 3rd vs 6th and 4th vs 5th ranked teams in the conference could play for an AQ spot. Potential Implications and Concerns:Devaluation of Regular Season: Critics argue that guaranteeing so many spots to specific conferences could diminish the importance of regular-season games, as teams with multiple losses could still make the playoff due to the automatic bid structure.Reduced Role of Selection Committee: With 11 automatic bids in a 16-team field, the selection committee's influence in choosing the participants would be significantly reduced. Their primary role would shift to seeding the teams.Fairness to Other Conferences: The ACC, Big 12, and Group of Five could argue that this format disproportionately favors the SEC and Big Ten and doesn't provide equitable access to the playoff for other deserving teams.Potential for Less Intriguing Matchups: If a significant portion of the field is filled by teams from the same two conferences, it could lead to less geographic diversity and potentially more rematches in the playoff.Current Status and Future Outlook:Growing Support: Reports indicate that the 16-team model with these AQ allocations is indeed gaining traction and support among decision-makers in the SEC and Big Ten.Power Four Meetings: Commissioners from the Power Four conferences have been meeting to discuss future playoff formats. Decision Expected Soon: A decision on whether the CFP will expand further and adopt a new format is anticipated in the next month or two, potentially with implementation as early as the 2026 season (when the current agreement with ESPN ends and a new one begins).SEC and Big Ten Leverage: Due to their financial power and the terms of the new CFP contract, the SEC and Big Ten hold significant influence over the future format. In conclusion, there is a clear and growing movement, driven largely by the SEC and Big Ten, towards expanding the College Football Playoff to 16 teams with a format that includes four automatic bids for each of those conferences, along with fewer at-large selections. While proponents argue it ensures the best teams participate and maximizes revenue, ...
activate_mytile_page_redirect_t1

What listeners say about BOMBSHELL: College Football Playoff's New 16 Team Format DESTROYS Big 12, Boosts SEC, Big 10, ESPN

Average Customer Ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com.au reviews

Amazon Reviews
No Reviews are Available
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.