Broad Lit Crit overview of... Mostly Sci Fi

What did you like best about Masterpieces of the Imaginative Mind: Literature's Most Fantastic Works? What did you like least?

This is a (by necessity) vary broad overview of the literary view of the history of... the fantastic, which is not by any stretch of the imagination fantasy. It starts with Grimm, puts them in a historical context, then moves through the history of... series literature, talking about examples where the surreal comes out. In the end, it presents a broad overview of the history of various sci fi genres and what they have to say about society.

It's very much a literary overview like you might find in a college class.

Would you listen to another book narrated by Professor Eric S. Rabkin?

Sure

Was Masterpieces of the Imaginative Mind: Literature's Most Fantastic Works worth the listening time?

Maybe

Any additional comments?

This was very deep into the literary criticism, and very deep into the sci fi. I was hoping for a more mythic structure look at things, and a broader survey of the fantastic. Instead, it focused mainly on extremely literary works, and took a very literary view of them. I was more hoping for a look of common themes and structures around what made them work as stories, rather than as literature, and also got snowballed by the 'fantastic'.

This is not meant as a criticism of the series, which was interesting, just a warning that a reasonably intelligent person misread the description.

18 people found this helpful

Highly Recommend

Would you listen to Masterpieces of the Imaginative Mind: Literature's Most Fantastic Works again? Why?

I have already listened to this lecture twice. The professor is knowledgeable and provides multiple theoretical view points. The subject matter ranges widely enough to keep you on your toes.

What was one of the most memorable moments of Masterpieces of the Imaginative Mind: Literature's Most Fantastic Works?

I thoroughly enjoyed his treatment of early fairy tales, Edgar Allan Poe, and Alice in Wonderland/Through the Looking Glass. These were by far the best parts of the discussion. Detailed and thought provoking, these discussions challenged the listener to reread many of these stories with a new perspective.

I also very much enjoyed his discussion and treatment of J.R. Tolkien as well as the Sci Fi genre.

Any additional comments?

Fantasy is a wonderful genre because it allows us to pull back from our assumptions about the world, examine issues and concepts we wouldn't normally question, and take a deeper look at our own selves.

6 people found this helpful

Science Fiction Defined

This is a very interesting course. The lecturer is well read and very knowledgable. His speaking voice is easy on the ears and his enthusiasm for the topic is quite evident and infectious. I came away looking at books I've read in a different way and a list of seminal science fiction works I want to read in the future.

4 people found this helpful

Literature appreciation

I quite liked this course. The approach reminded me of other books from The great Courses by prof Robert Greenberg - presenting works and authors in a historical and artistic context. After listening to the course I am encouraged to explore further specific books or authors and read the books. Also, reading them after the course is more enjoyable compared to not having as much context.

If you're looking for concentrated learning about literature this is not the course to get, if instead you like fantasy as a genre and are would like a good foundation from where to explore new authors, then this course is a very enjoyable way to do it.

9 people found this helpful

Fantastic!!!

One of the best courses I have ever had the pleasure to listen to. This is an experience. Professor Rabkin knows his stuff, but most importantly - knows how to pass on that information. Loved it !!!!!

2 people found this helpful

Not convinced

Any additional comments?

I didn't agree with some of the conclusions drawn in the early lectures, which isn't a big deal. Differences of opinion make for good dialogue. But - two of the later lectures touched on works I am very familiar with and made some rather obvious errors in relating the texts - which makes me wonder how many other errors were made re: books I am not as familiar with...

6 people found this helpful

Interesting Material but not the best lecturer.

The series of lectures by Professor Rabkin are very interesting as a survey of Fantasy in literature. I learned a lot about the relationship between early folklore and myth and how it relates to and is still very much alive in the fiction of today. The problem I had was that Rabkin, stutters and mis-speaks having to backtrack and correct himself too often making this sometimes hard to listen to. I would understand this in a live lecture but this is recorded specifically for the audio book. Edit and do retakes please!

2 people found this helpful

A joy and an inspiration

If nothing else, it will help you rethink some of the incredible works of art we take from granted.

I especially loved the section on Walter Miller’s Canticle for Liebowitz.

Everything wrong with academic lit criticism

This book wasn’t for you, but who do you think might enjoy it more?

If you're someone who wants to learn about the vaginal symbolism of The Pit and the Pendulum, or you want to hear about the significance of the fact that John Carter and Jesus Christ share the same initials. Seriously, those are both supposedly cogent points that the lecturer makes in this series.

What do you think your next listen will be?

Another lecture series, but one less based around opinion.

Which character – as performed by Professor Eric S. Rabkin – was your favorite?

Not applicable.

You didn’t love this book... but did it have any redeeming qualities?

The early lectures around the academic research that has been done around folk tales were interesting.

5 people found this helpful

sci-fi anthology

start well, but it get bogged down in sci-fi problematics which, though interesting and complementary, do not exhaust the title subject. maybe 24 chapters are not enough.

2 people found this helpful