
"Apple Dodges Justice Department Bullet in Landmark Antitrust Case"
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
This decision is also significant for Apple’s antitrust exposure, because it underscores how the courts are so far rejecting some of the Department of Justice’s most aggressive demands. The Justice Department, now led by Attorney General Merrick Garland and, on the antitrust front, Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater, has called for bold solutions—sometimes even a forced breakup or restructuring of dominant tech firms. However, the courts have so far favored more incremental remedies, focusing on targeted behavioral restrictions on firms like Google while upholding key business partnerships like those between Google and Apple.
On the Apple front, the Department of Justice recently filed suit claiming Apple leverages its premium smartphone dominance, especially in app store policy and distribution, to create unfair barriers for app developers and limit consumer choice. Apple has faced other legal setbacks: in Australia, on August thirteenth, a federal court found both Apple and Google violated competition law regarding app stores, and a United States court found Apple in contempt over previous app store-related injunctions—Apple is appealing that order, with a major class action lawsuit set for trial in February two thousand twenty-six.
Top Apple executive Eddy Cue, senior vice president of services, recently played a pivotal role by testifying that the Google-Apple search deal benefits users by delivering higher-quality, privacy-respecting search results. This testimony was widely credited with influencing the court’s decision to let those payments continue.
While Apple celebrated a big win last week by keeping the search deal intact, the company is not out of the regulatory woods. The case highlights the growing tension between the United States Department of Justice and the largest technology companies, with new enforcement task forces being announced by top Department of Justice officials to address what they call “gamesmanship” and obstruction during antitrust investigations.
If the Department of Justice does succeed in forcing Apple to loosen its app store policies or allow more third-party software access, it could dramatically reshape the app economy—not just for Apple but for developers and users worldwide. Industry experts say the recent Google decision signals that the courts are hesitant to force radical structural change unless there is overwhelming evidence of consumer harm, preferring remedies that maintain stability within the tech ecosystem.
For now, both sides are claiming partial victories—the Department of Justice keeps the pressure on and wins some procedural fights, while Apple escapes the most damaging immediate penalties and continues to build partnerships, especially around artificial intelligence with both Google Gemini and ChatGPT rumored as future search options in its products. The ultimate outcome—for Apple and the broader tech sector—remains uncertain, but pressure on Apple’s walled garden is rising and the regulatory winds in Washington are blowing stronger than ever.
Some great Deals https://amzn.to/49SJ3Qs
For more check out http://www.quietplease.ai
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.