Apocalypse Never cover art

Apocalypse Never

Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All

Preview
Try Premium Plus free
1 credit a month to buy any audiobook in our entire collection.
Access to thousands of additional audiobooks and Originals from the Plus Catalogue.
Member-only deals & discounts.
Auto-renews at $16.45/mo after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Apocalypse Never

By: Michael Shellenberger
Narrated by: Stephen Graybill
Try Premium Plus free

Auto-renews at $16.45/mo after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy Now for $26.99

Buy Now for $26.99

About this listen

Climate change is real, but it’s not the end of the world. It is not even our most serious environmental problem.

Michael Shellenberger has been fighting for a greener planet for decades. He helped save the world’s last unprotected redwoods. He co-created the predecessor to today’s Green New Deal. And he led a successful effort by climate scientists and activists to keep nuclear plants operating, preventing a spike of emissions.

But in 2019, as some claimed "billions of people are going to die", contributing to rising anxiety, including among adolescents, Shellenberger decided that, as a lifelong environmental activist, leading energy expert, and father of a teenage daughter, he needed to speak out to separate science from fiction.

Despite decades of news media attention, many remain ignorant of basic facts. Carbon emissions peaked and have been declining in most developed nations for over a decade. Deaths from extreme weather, even in poor nations, declined 80 percent over the last four decades. And the risk of Earth warming to very high temperatures is increasingly unlikely thanks to slowing population growth and abundant natural gas.

Curiously, the people who are the most alarmist about the problems also tend to oppose the obvious solutions.

What’s really behind the rise of apocalyptic environmentalism? There are powerful financial interests. There are desires for status and power. But most of all, there is a desire among supposedly secular people for transcendence. This spiritual impulse can be natural and healthy. But in preaching fear without love, and guilt without redemption, the new religion is failing to satisfy our deepest psychological and existential needs.

©2020 Michael Shellenberger (P)2020 HarperCollins Publishers
Environment Political Science Politics & Government Science Emotionally Gripping Thought-Provoking
All stars
Most relevant  
Excellent resource to balance the climate change zealots.This should be widely promoted to provide a balanced debate Congratulations to the author hopefully this will be part of a significant rethink by the political leaders worldwide

Welcome addition to the knowledge of Climate Change

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

On the surface this book can be a little confusing because it appears to cover more than just climate change, but Michael covers these interrelated topics (e.g. economic development, conservation, capitalism and greed) to put the issue of climate change into the broader context when discussing the risks of alarmism.
While this book was not a diversion of my own opinion on the issue of climate change, there was quite a bit of material present that has given me a different view of some of these interrelated issues.
This book is not for the faint hearted, it's long, but it is definitely worth the time.

A big picture

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

apocalypse never brought to me a coherent scientifically based and factual understanding of environmentalism. political influences, and the factual understanding of humanities persistent technelogical movements towards higher energy density that provide relief from the monumental burden of low power density for the planet, and simultaneously provides salvation for millions lifted out of poverty.
the author provides factual, scientifically founded retort to apocalyptic environmentalism and provides within that, relief and reassurance that the world is a safer more environmentally stable place today and provides hope of a bright future for us and the world we live in.

excellent, factual and entirely engaging

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

An intriguing and thought provoking deep dive at into one of the “hottest”topics in the world today. Taking an honest look at the facts and economic drivers around the world and a peek behind the curtain of climate change fundamentalism, has given me much food for thought. Highly recommended reading.

Thought provoking

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

I found apocalypse never to be a window into the climate activism movement, government and corporate policy development and the coercion of facts to achieve a predetermined outcome.
It was heartening to listen of our natural historical progression towards achieving greater harmony with our planet and what we had already achieved, it is not the doomsday we are all constantly fed.
I left the book feeling we have a long future albeit many social and now ingrained climate dogma to overcome.

Transformative

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

Just read this book, before you splash Campbells soup on a Warhol or disrupt some traffic or whatever.
Us gen-x environmentalists have had it up to here with all this crap and this book- written by a fair and dinkum tree hugger from the nineties, will HELP you make sense of all the misinformation and perhaps even inspire you to action in service of sanity.
Just buy it already fer cryin out loud….

Finally common sense

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

Initial review: 2 August 2020
------------------------------------------

Whilst I have some difficulty with some of the the comments on nuclear weapons, overall I believe this is a very important book. I intend to use it as a springboard for further research, and I aim to cross check much of the material. If I subsequently change my mind, I shall come back and revise this review.

For now however, I feel everyone should read this book. I fear, however, that those that need it most will not give it the time.


Follow up review: 9 March 2021
---------------------------------------------

It is now about 7 months since my above review. I have spent a considerable amount of time reading various critiques of the book and conducting my own fact checking. I shall first emphasize that I have only skimmed Shellenberger’s comments on nuclear power and not reviewed these or any of the associated critiques. This should be kept in mind when reading my review below.

This review is both of Shellenberger’s book and his Forbes article “On Behalf of Environmentalists I Apologize for the Climate Scare” published on 28 June 2020. His article was a promo for his book, and so I shall treat both in unison here.

Some of the criticisms levelled at Shellenberger are on the basis that his article provides no evidence or substantiation to his assertions and that many are sensationalist I nature. It is true that some of the article’s claims, on their own, do seem sensationalist. Remembering that Shellenberger’s contention is that much of the environmental movement is pushing an alarmist agenda, it’s worth noting that alarmism is just another form of sensationalism. A good example is Shellenberger’s reference, in the article, to the word ‘natural disasters’. Another example is his reference to the impact of climate change on wild fires. The book provides the nuance that is absent in the article, and while it is true that the article was a promo for his book, a very small amount of clarification would have circumvented many of the criticisms.

All of that said, many of those providing critiques were more than happy to tear into the article without regard to the book itself, even though they knew it was a promo for the book. These were, after all, highly respected and/or prominent scientists (‘experts’), not radio shock jocks. This itself speaks volumes. It speaks of a scientific community who’s first instinct is to defend their turf – rather than provide the dispassionate feedback we expect from our leading scientists and relevant institutions. This itself is indicative of the zealotry and intentional alarmism that Shellenberger is decrying.

But it gets much worse. Much of the critiquing commentary is at best selective and at worst deliberately misleading. Sometimes it is irrational – depressingly so, considering that I am referring to ‘expert’ critiques (notably, but not exclusively, that provided by climatefeedback.org). Usually when I examined the footnoted reports cited in the critiques, I found at best vague statements about possible risks of this that or the other, and at other times I found no corroborating evidence at all. At times the cited material was even deliberately misleading.

It went generally like this:

The expert reviewer would give a strong and often emotive counter to Shellenberger’s claims, with footnoted references. I would examine the cited reference reports and generally find a lot of hair splitting and sometimes essentially nothing of any substance.

The point is that Shellenberger is referring to alarmism in the community, including a widespread sense of impending doom. He cites concrete examples of this, including public statements by prominent figures. If the best the ‘experts’ can do is counter with a whole lot of hair splitting, then isn’t this a ringing endorsement of Shellenberger’s premise?

My best guess is that the reviewers, in their mad rush to damage control, were more intent on point scoring than in reasoned critiquing – and were counting on most readers (especially their ‘constituency’) not bothering to get stuck into the fine detail. Admittedly, and sadly, this was probably a good strategy for them, as they know that no one wanting to be tainted by the word ‘denier’ would dare question their message.

But to anyone willing to go there, the ‘expert’ critiques amount to a massive home goal. For if the experts themselves cannot find better evidence to counter Shellenberger’s claims of alarmism, then isn’t the logical conclusion that it probably doesn’t exist? After all, they’re the experts.

It is clear to me that essentially there is an ideological war raging. In one camp we have those that believe that economic development will continue to bring human progress, including solutions to sustainability. In the other camp we have those that believe that economic development will bring ecological ruin and that humanity needs to take a step back. With every war comes the fog of war. It is unfortunate that our leading scientists and scientific institutions are not immune to it.

We who are watching from the sidelines can save ourselves a lot of despair, frustration, disappointment and confusion, if we simply accept this fact.

My conclusion, after spending several months on this, is that Shellenberger does have his biases and blind spots, as we all do – and can be accused of confirmation bias in a number of cases. I still believe we need to tread carefully and show respect for our planet. However, the thrust of his contention stands. I now have less trust in our scientific community and institutions, certainly with regards to environmental issues, than ever.

essential read

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

This book presents a compelling case for an alternative pathway to achieving a future that is not just cleaner and cooler but better. This is not climate denialism, only an alternative solution to the problems humanity faces.

One need not and should not take the book as definitive, only suggestive of an alternative energy and development pathway.

What is clear is that clean and abundant energy changes the game for all societies and solves many of our problems. With such a power source, many solutions become viable that were not viable before.

The Climate Problem is really the Energy Problem, and seen in this way, possible solutions become much clearer.

Regardless of your belief about the correct pathway forward, this book is worth reading and consideration. I believe it also paints a future that climate change deniers may be willing to invest in regardless of their skepticism; what's good for the environment can also be good for us as individuals and societies.

A compelling case for an alternative approach

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

Environmentalism with convincing arguments, at last. Exposes one-sided distortions, concludes with lived examples, and explains in easy to read fluency. An important book for the world. Very impressed.

A read on the environment, with humanity.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

Very well written, full of facts and stories that weave together into a compelling narrative. As a life-long environmentalist, Shellenberger shows us that many of the more apocalyptical claims about the state of the planet are vastly exaggerated by an industry that relies on the existence of an exestential threat to justify it's trillion dollar existence. More importantly, he provides a message of positive change and hope that we can tackle the various environmental challenges we face by reducing poverty and raising the developing countries to a level where they can afford to put their resources into environmental protection along with the developed world.

Great antidote to environmental anxiety

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

See more reviews
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.