Showing titles in Epistemology

As we stand on the cusp of a new political reality, the contours of personal freedom and autonomy are becoming increasingly well-defined. The future holds the possibility of an existence where the barriers to living life on one’s own terms are ever-diminishing, where the power of voluntarily connected individuals challenges and reshapes the statist quo. Even though the journey toward this new reality is fraught with trade-offs and challenges, it has the potential for unprecedented freedom and philosophical fulfillment.

Though now little known outside specialist philosophical circles, the Scottish philosopher Thomas Reid (1710-1796) is remembered both for the founding of the Scottish School of Common Sense and his major work, An Inquiry into the Human Mind: on the Principles of Common Sense (1764). With his...

Using examples and analysis, Abramson gives an account of gaslighting and its immorality, and argues that such a discussion can help us understand other aspects of social life—from racism and sexism to the structure of interpersonal trust.

Do you believe God exists? This bold audio series invites you to join some of the world’s leading thinkers in taking on this profound question. In 13 riveting episodes, your host, Robert Lawrence Kuhn, tackles this topic in one-on-one interviews with leading figures across fields. Addressing issues ranging from the problem of evil to how the discovery of alien life might affect our belief systems, this series will engage your mind and heart in some of the universe’s biggest questions.

This short audio on logic argues that logic and science can go hand in hand, and that, by taking observations of perceptions and sensations, and applying logical analysis to them, you have the power to build conceptual models and frameworks that you can use in order to predict what you should do in the future and to reason how to solve the problems in your life.

The Liminal Spectrum: Truth, Order, and the Line Between challenges one of modern life’s deepest assumptions: that approved knowledge is the same as truth. Caleb A. Farmer explores the hidden “approval economy” that shapes what societies call objective, neutral, and legitimate, arguing that consensus often reflects power, timing, and institutional permission more than final reality. Moving through philosophy, sociology, theology, and cultural critique, the book reframes subjectivity and objectivity as positions on a threshold rather than opposites.

What if the greatest intellectual weapon ever forged was not a theory, not a proof, but a refusal to believe? In the eighteenth century, a cheerful Scotsman named David Hume dismantled the foundations of human knowledge with nothing more than a sharp eye and an uncomfortable question: How do you actually know what you think you know? Two and a half centuries later, his challenge has not been answered. It has only grown more urgent. The Skeptic’s Armor takes readers on a journey through Hume’s radical skepticism and its astonishing resonance with modern science.

"Truth is discoverable. I'm certain of it. It's not popular to say. It's not popular to think. But I know it's true."

So begins an examination into the most fundamental questions in philosophy. Does objective truth exist? Can we know anything with certainty? Are there true logical contradictions?

Steve Patterson answers emphatically, "We can know absolute, certain, and objective truths. These truths serve as the foundation for the rest of our knowledge."

Az ember hajlamos nagy titkokat sejteni ott, ahol egyszerűen csak nagyobb erők működnek, mint amiket uralni tud. Azonnal a nagy titkot keresi, amikor kiemelkedő tehetségekkel találkozik, és akkor is, amikor a tudomány eszközeivel igyekszik mélyebben megérteni a világot.

L'uomo è un essere intelligente. Nel dizionario di Oxford l'intelligenza viene definita come "la capacità di acquisire e applicare conoscenze e competenze complesse". Se prendiamo per buona questa definizione, possiamo essere certi che l'essere umano, per come lo conosciamo, verrà presto superato dagli algoritmi di intelligenza artificiale. Le nostre forme sociali camminano al di fuori dell'ordine dell'intelligenza possibile all'uomo.

More than at any other time in human history, we live in an age defined by movement and mobility; yet, we lack a unifying theory which takes this seriously as a starting point for philosophy. The history of philosophy has systematically explained movement as derived from something else that does not move: space, eternity, force, and time.

First published in 1710, George Berkeley's A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge is a seminal contribution to Empiricist philosophy. Making the bold assertion that the physical world consists only of ideas and thus does not exist outside the mind, this work establishes Berkeley as the founder of the immaterialist school of thought. A major influence on such later philosophers as David Hume and Immanuel Kant, Berkeley's ideas have played a role in such diverse fields as mathematics and metaphysics and continue to spark debate today.

A compelling investigation into one of our most coveted and cherished ideals, and the efforts of modern science to penetrate the mysterious nature of this timeless virtue. We all recognize wisdom, but defining it is more elusive. In this fascinating journey from philosophy to science, Stephen S. Hall gives us a dramatic history of wisdom, from its sudden emergence in four different locations (Greece, China, Israel, and India) in the fifth century B.C. to its modern manifestations.

The novelty of the book lies in its reimagining of Kant's philosophy as a dynamic tool of inquiry rather than a fossilized dogma. The author argues that treating Kant's work as a sacred, immutable canon betrays its very essence. Kant's thought was, from the outset, critical—meant to probe the boundaries of reason and to craft methods of knowing, not to hand down definitive answers carved in philosophical stone. The book highlights the central paradox: by turning Kant's ideas into doctrine, one drains them of the very critical energy that Kant himself saw as the lifeblood of philosophy.

In The War Between Mind and Matter: Berkeley and Idealism of Reality, Boris Kriger stages the ultimate philosophical showdown between idealism and materialism—and the results are far less predictable than you might expect. With wit, intellectual rigor, and an irreverent sense of humor, Kriger guides the listener through Berkeley's radical vision of a world made of ideas, pits it against the strongest objections materialism can muster, and reveals why every attempt to refute idealism only proves its point.

We used to know how to know. We got our answers from books or experts. We'd nail down the facts and move on. But in the Internet age, knowledge has moved onto networks. There's more knowledge than ever, of course, but it's different. Topics have no boundaries, and nobody agrees on anything.Yet this is the greatest time in history to be a knowledge seeker - if you know how.

Epistemic vices are character traits, attitudes, or thinking styles that prevent us from gaining, keeping, or sharing knowledge. In this book, Quassim Cassam gives an account of the nature and importance of these vices, which include closed-mindedness, intellectual arrogance, wishful thinking, and prejudice. In providing the first extensive coverage of vice epistemology, an exciting new area of philosophical research, Vices of the Mind uses real examples drawn primarily from the world of politics to develop a compelling theory of epistemic vice.

Ignorance, whether passive or active, conscious or unconscious, has always been a part of the human condition, Renata Salecl argues. What has changed in our post-truth, postindustrial world is that we often feel overwhelmed by the constant flood of information and misinformation. It sometimes seems impossible to differentiate between truth and falsehood and, as a result, there has been a backlash against the idea of expertise, and a rise in the number of people actively choosing not to know.

A formally written, deeply introspective, and meticulously detailed account of one year spent working the midnight shift inside a vast Municipal Archive. Told through the eyes of a self-reflective narrator a method essayist this nonfiction work eschews conclusion and moral, focusing instead on the texture of quiet thought, the persistence of small insect life, the low-frequency hum of machinery, and the minute details (the scratch on a door, the stain on a marble floor) that reveal the building’s own slow, private life.

Classical epistemology asked "how does the mind acquire knowledge of the world?" and spent three and a half centuries unable to answer, because the question was badly posed. It presupposed a division between mind and world, between subject and object, between inner representation and outer reality — a division that does not exist in nature.