We live in an age of unprecedented information abundance. Knowledge is instant, unlimited, and available to everyone. And yet, confusion, fragmentation, and distrust have never been greater. In this episode, The Democratization of Information and the Crisis of Discernment, Anthony Aberino argues that information abundance without intellectual and moral formation accelerates epistemic and ethical chaos. When education is reduced to information transfer and skills training, and when digital platforms dissolve traditional epistemic hierarchies, access to information no longer leads to understanding or wisdom. This episode examines how the collapse of educational formation and the democratization of information have given rise to the internet autodidact, the erosion of institutional trust, and a culture of false confidence. Drawing on classical philosophy and the liberal arts tradition, the modern utilitarian view of education is contrasted with the classical understanding of education as the formation of the intellect and the will. This is not simply a problem of misinformation or fake news. It is a crisis of discernment. Topics include:

• Information abundance vs. intellectual formation
• The collapse of epistemic hierarchy in the digital age
• The rise of the internet autodidact
• Classical education
• The Trivium, and liberal learning
• Why information without formation does not liberate—but deforms

Subscribe for long-form reflections on philosophy, education, and the cultural consequences of the Digital Age.

Anthony Alberino sits down with philosopher and author Pat Flynn for a rigorous and insightful discussion on one of the most important questions in Christian philosophy: How is morality grounded in God? Most Christians sense that moral truths and moral obligations are rooted in God—but how exactly? Is morality based on God’s authority, His will, or His nature? And how do we avoid the classic pitfalls of divine voluntarism, Platonism, and the Euthyphro dilemma? This conversation goes far beyond surface-level debates and presses into the metaphysics of goodness, divine simplicity, classical theism, and what it really means to say God is the Good itself.

In this episode, we dive deep into one of the most striking features of our cultural moment: the explosive rise of conspiracy thinking—and why the digital environment is the perfect greenhouse for its growth. The internet doesn’t just expose us to conspiracy theories. It disposes us toward conspiratorial thinking. From the Charlie Kirk assassination narrative to the viral success of commentators like Candice Owens, it’s clear that conspiratorial frameworks resonate powerfully in today’s networked world. But the real question is why. I argue that the structure of the digital environment itself is subtly reshaping our cognitive habits. The constant flood of chaotic, unfiltered information pressures us to seek coherence. And the most natural, efficient organizing tool we have is narrative. But when narrative begins to substitute for evidence—when coherence replaces correspondence—we fall into what I call narrativism: the intellectual vice of mistaking a compelling story for a justified explanation. In this episode, we explore:

• Why humans, overwhelmed by digital information overload, instinctively rely on narrative
• How narrativism turns conspiracy theories into cognitively “easy” explanations
• Why the internet provides endless raw material for increasingly complex, seductive conspiracies
• How algorithms reward dramatic, agent-centered content over careful reasoning
• Why our feeds create the illusion of meaningful patterns that don’t actually exist
• How the “information superhighway” has fractured rather than unified our understanding of reality

Imagine looking at the night sky with the naked eye—you can draw a few simple constellations. Now imagine looking through the Hubble Telescope. The more points of light you see, the more elaborate your constellations become. That’s the digital environment: an infinite starfield of data encouraging ever more intricate, and often illusory, explanations. This episode examines how digital technology subtly cultivates the intellectual conditions for conspiracy thinking, not just by offering access to theories but by habituating our minds toward patterns of thought that make conspiratorial narratives feel intuitive, emotionally satisfying, and rationally compelling—even when they aren’t.

If you’re interested in the intersection of technology, psychology, philosophy, and culture, this is an episode worth your time. 👍 If you find this helpful, hit Like and Subscribe. 🧠 Share your thoughts below: Has digital technology changed the way you interpret information?