• Debunking Nietzsche - Cognitive Biases
    Nov 13 2023
    Debunking Nietzsche - Cognitive Biases

    Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophical contributions have had a profound impact on modern thought, yet it's important to recognize that his analyses are shaped by certain cognitive biases. Cognitive biases are systematic patterns of deviation from norm or rationality in judgment, and understanding these biases can help to critically evaluate Nietzsche's work, particularly his critique of Christianity.

    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • Debunking Nietsche - Logical Errors and Logical Fallacies
    Nov 13 2023
    Nietzsche's Logical Errors and Logical Fallacies

    Friedrich Nietzsche is a seminal figure in the history of philosophy, but like any thinker, he is not above critique. This appendix aims to identify some logical errors and fallacies present in Nietzsche's arguments against Christianity. While this does not invalidate his entire body of work, these points are significant for anyone wishing to critically engage with Nietzsche's critique of the Christian faith.

    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • Debunking Nietzsche - Factual Errors
    Nov 13 2023

    While Friedrich Nietzsche's critique of Christianity has sparked numerous debates and intellectual explorations, it's important to note that his understanding of Christian history, doctrine, and practice contains several factual inaccuracies or misleading interpretations. This appendix aims to highlight some of these errors to further inform our understanding of both Nietzsche and Christianity.

    Show More Show Less
    2 mins
  • Debunking Dawkins - The Epistemological errors
    Nov 8 2023

    The epistemological errors of Dawkins are discussed here.

    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • Debunking Dawkins - Logical Errors of Dawkins
    Nov 8 2023

    The logical errors and logical fallcies of Dawkins are discussed here.

    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • Debunking Dawkins: Factual Errors of Dawkins
    Nov 8 2023

    Here the factual errors of Dawkins are discussed.

    Show More Show Less
    3 mins