Send a text

In this episode of Justice Seekers, attorneys Natalie and Katrina break down how civil litigation, independent forensic review, and federal civil rights law reopened an investigation many believed was finished and how procedural law ultimately reshaped the path toward accountability.

We explore the legal mechanisms that allowed Sandra’s case to move forward, including wrongful death litigation, internal police investigations, federal jurisdiction, grand jury indictments, and the complex pretrial motions now shaping the upcoming federal trial.

This episode focuses on the law behind the headlines, and the difficult question at the center of the case:

What happens when the justice system must reexamine its own conclusions?

Send a text

Send a text

A small Texas town. A brutal murder. A husband with a solid alibi, and a conviction built on blood evidence that modern science now calls unreliable.

In 1985, schoolteacher Mickey Bryan was found murdered in her home. Prosecutors claimed bloodstain analysis proved her husband, Joe Bryan, was the killer — despite being over 100 miles away at the time.

What followed was a decades-long fight exposing junk forensic science, overlooked suspects, and a justice system determined to defend its own theory.

In this episode of Justice Seekers, we uncover how one piece of questionable evidence helped send an innocent man to prison for more than 30 years and why his conviction but not his imprisonment still stands today.

Because sometimes the most dangerous evidence… looks like science.

🎙️ Follow Justice Seekers for true stories of wrongful convictions and the fight for justice.

Send us a text

In this episode of Justice Seekers, we revisit one of the most infamous criminal trials in American history: The People v. O.J. Simpson.
What happens when overwhelming evidence collides with police misconduct, racial tension, media spectacle, and a deeply divided jury? We break down the case beyond the headlines, examining how the prosecution lost control of a winnable case, how the defense reshaped reasonable doubt, and why the verdict still sparks debate decades later.

Send us a text

Send us a text

In this episode, attorneys Natalie and Katrina examine the 1996 abduction and murder of 9-year-old Amber Hagerman, the case that prompted the creation of the Amber Alert system and reshaped law enforcement response to child abductions nationwide.

We analyze the investigative timeline, evidentiary breakdowns, and jurisdictional delays that limited early rescue efforts, then break down the legal framework governing Amber Alerts today—including statutory criteria, constitutional considerations, and concerns about equal protection, alert fatigue, and public trust.

Nearly three decades later, the case remains unsolved, but its legal legacy endures as one of the most significant reforms in modern child-protection law.

Send us a text

In 1991, a fire ripped through a small home in Corsicana, Texas, killing three young sisters. Their father, Cameron Todd Willingham, escaped; but within days, investigators accused him of deliberately setting the fire.

In this episode, attorneys Natalie and Katrina revisit the Willingham case and examine why so many believe Texas executed an innocent man.

What We Cover

• The fire and early suspicion
• Outdated arson methods used to claim the blaze was intentional
• Jailhouse informant testimony later revealed as unreliable
• Defense failures in a death penalty trial
• Prosecutorial misconduct allegations
• How junk science continues to drive wrongful convictions

Why It Matters

The Willingham case exposes cracks in the justice system, reminding us that flawed forensics, unreliable witnesses, and weak defense representation can mean the difference between life and death.

Send us a text

On Christmas Eve 2002, 27-year-old Laci Peterson, eight months pregnant, vanished from her Modesto, California home. What began as a missing persons search spiraled into a national obsession, exposing infidelity, media mania, and one of the most polarizing murder cases in American history.

In this episode, Natalie and Katrina unpack the timeline, investigation, legal missteps, and cultural impact of the case that transformed Scott Peterson from an average husband to the face of presumed guilt across America.