Send a text

In this episode of Justice Seekers, attorneys Natalie and Katrina break down how civil litigation, independent forensic review, and federal civil rights law reopened an investigation many believed was finished and how procedural law ultimately reshaped the path toward accountability.

We explore the legal mechanisms that allowed Sandra’s case to move forward, including wrongful death litigation, internal police investigations, federal jurisdiction, grand jury indictments, and the complex pretrial motions now shaping the upcoming federal trial.

This episode focuses on the law behind the headlines, and the difficult question at the center of the case:

What happens when the justice system must reexamine its own conclusions?

Send a text

Send a text

A small Texas town. A brutal murder. A husband with a solid alibi, and a conviction built on blood evidence that modern science now calls unreliable.

In 1985, schoolteacher Mickey Bryan was found murdered in her home. Prosecutors claimed bloodstain analysis proved her husband, Joe Bryan, was the killer — despite being over 100 miles away at the time.

What followed was a decades-long fight exposing junk forensic science, overlooked suspects, and a justice system determined to defend its own theory.

In this episode of Justice Seekers, we uncover how one piece of questionable evidence helped send an innocent man to prison for more than 30 years and why his conviction but not his imprisonment still stands today.

Because sometimes the most dangerous evidence… looks like science.

🎙️ Follow Justice Seekers for true stories of wrongful convictions and the fight for justice.