• Integrare per governare il principio della ReImmigrazione
    Mar 15 2026
    Integrare per governare: il principio della ReImmigrazione Benvenuti a una nuova puntata del podcast “Integrazione o ReImmigrazione”.
    Io sono l’avvocato Fabio Loscerbo e in questo spazio analizziamo il fenomeno migratorio da una prospettiva giuridica e realistica, cercando di capire come possa essere davvero governato nel lungo periodo. Nel dibattito pubblico sull’immigrazione emergono spesso due visioni opposte. Da una parte c’è chi considera l’immigrazione principalmente una risorsa economica: servono lavoratori, l’Italia invecchia, e quindi bisogna favorire nuovi ingressi. Dall’altra parte c’è chi guarda al fenomeno soprattutto come a un problema di sicurezza e di controllo delle frontiere. Ma entrambe queste letture ignorano una questione fondamentale: l’integrazione. L’immigrazione non è soltanto un movimento di persone da un paese all’altro. È un processo sociale che riguarda la capacità di inserirsi in una comunità, comprenderne le regole e partecipare alla vita collettiva. Quando questo processo non funziona, aumentano inevitabilmente le tensioni sociali. È proprio da qui che nasce il paradigma della ReImmigrazione. L’idea è semplice: la permanenza sul territorio deve essere collegata a un percorso reale di integrazione. Non basta entrare legalmente in un paese; occorre dimostrare nel tempo di far parte della comunità che ti ospita. Questo percorso si fonda su tre pilastri molto concreti: lavoro, conoscenza della lingua e rispetto delle regole. Quando questi elementi si realizzano, lo Stato ha interesse a stabilizzare la presenza dello straniero. In alcuni casi, strumenti giuridici come la protezione complementare, prevista dall’articolo 19 del Testo Unico Immigrazione, possono riconoscere proprio queste situazioni di integrazione effettiva. Ma esiste anche l’altra faccia della medaglia. Se il percorso di integrazione non si realizza, lo Stato deve poter intervenire con strumenti efficaci di rientro nel paese di origine. È questo il significato della ReImmigrazione: il ritorno non come punizione, ma come parte naturale di una politica migratoria seria. Il principio diventa quindi molto chiaro: chi si integra resta, chi non si integra torna. Governare l’immigrazione attraverso l’integrazione significa costruire un sistema più stabile, più comprensibile e più giusto, sia per chi arriva sia per la società che accoglie. Grazie per aver ascoltato questa puntata del podcast “Integrazione o ReImmigrazione”. Io sono l’avvocato Fabio Loscerbo e vi do appuntamento al prossimo episodio.
    Per approfondimenti potete visitare il sito www.reimmigrazione.com.

    Questo episodio include contenuti generati dall’IA.
    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • Integration First Understanding the ReImmigration Paradigm
    Mar 15 2026
    Integration First: Understanding the ReImmigration Paradigm Welcome to a new episode of the podcast “Integration or ReImmigration.”
    My name is Fabio Loscerbo, I am an Italian immigration lawyer, and in this podcast I discuss how immigration can be governed in a realistic and sustainable way. Today I want to explain an idea that is at the center of my work and research: the ReImmigration paradigm. If you follow the immigration debate in the United States, you are probably used to hearing two main positions. On one side, there are those who argue that immigration is primarily an economic necessity: the economy needs workers, demographic decline is accelerating, and therefore immigration must increase. On the other side, there are those who focus mainly on border control and national security. Europe has the same debate. Italy has the same debate. But both approaches often ignore a fundamental question: integration. Immigration is not simply the movement of people across borders. It is a social process that determines whether newcomers become part of a community or remain socially and culturally separated from it. When integration fails, tensions grow—economically, socially, and politically. This is where the concept of ReImmigration comes in. The idea is straightforward: the right to remain in a country should be connected to a real process of integration. Entry alone is not enough. Over time, there must be evidence that the person is actually becoming part of the society. In practical terms, integration rests on three basic elements: work, language, and respect for the rules of the host society. Work connects a person to the economic life of the country. Language allows participation in civic life. And respect for the rules is the foundation of any functioning community. When these conditions are present, the state has a clear interest in stabilizing the migrant’s status. In the Italian legal system, for example, there are legal instruments that can recognize these situations when a person has built a genuine path of integration. But the paradigm also introduces a second principle that is often missing from the political debate: responsibility. If integration does not occur—if a person does not enter the labor market, does not engage with the social system, and remains outside the basic framework of the host society—the state must also have mechanisms that allow a structured return to the country of origin. This is what I call ReImmigration. It is not a punishment and it is not a political slogan. It is simply the idea that migration policy must include both sides of the process: integration and return. Without this balance, migration systems tend to drift toward two extremes. Either they tolerate large areas of irregularity, or they promise mass deportations that rarely happen in practice. A system centered on integration changes the logic entirely. The rule becomes clear: those who integrate stay; those who do not integrate return. For societies facing major demographic and political pressures around migration, this principle can help restore something that is currently fragile in many countries: public trust in immigration policy. Thank you for listening to this episode of “Integration or ReImmigration.” I’m Fabio Loscerbo, and if you want to explore these ideas further you can visit www.reimmigrazione.com. See you in the next episode.

    Questo episodio include contenuti generati dall’IA.
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins
  • Integration als Grundlage der Migrationspolitik das Paradigma der ReImmigration
    Mar 15 2026
    Integration als Grundlage der Migrationspolitik: das Paradigma der ReImmigration Willkommen zu einer neuen Folge des Podcasts „Integration oder ReImmigration“.
    Mein Name ist Fabio Loscerbo, ich bin italienischer Rechtsanwalt für Migrationsrecht, und in diesem Podcast versuche ich zu erklären, wie Migration realistisch und nachhaltig gesteuert werden kann. Heute möchte ich ein Konzept vorstellen, das im Zentrum meiner Arbeit steht: das Paradigma der ReImmigration. Wenn man die Migrationsdebatte in Deutschland verfolgt, erkennt man schnell zwei dominante Perspektiven. Auf der einen Seite wird Migration häufig als wirtschaftliche Notwendigkeit betrachtet. Deutschland steht vor einem demografischen Wandel, viele Branchen berichten über Fachkräftemangel, und deshalb wird Einwanderung oft als Lösung für wirtschaftliche Probleme dargestellt. Auf der anderen Seite gibt es eine wachsende Debatte über Sicherheit, Grenzkontrollen und die Steuerung irregulärer Migration. Diese beiden Positionen erscheinen sehr unterschiedlich, aber sie haben ein gemeinsames Problem: Sie konzentrieren sich selten auf die zentrale Frage der Integration. Migration ist nicht nur die Bewegung von Menschen über Grenzen hinweg. Sie ist ein sozialer Prozess. Entscheidend ist nicht nur, wie viele Menschen in ein Land kommen, sondern ob sie tatsächlich Teil der Gesellschaft werden, in der sie leben. Wenn Integration nicht funktioniert, entstehen soziale Spannungen. Diese Erfahrung machen viele europäische Länder, und auch in Deutschland wird die Integrationsfrage zunehmend zu einem zentralen politischen Thema. Hier setzt das Konzept der ReImmigration an. Die Grundidee ist einfach: Das Recht, dauerhaft in einem Land zu bleiben, sollte mit einem echten Integrationsprozess verbunden sein. Der legale Eintritt in ein Land ist nur der erste Schritt. Mit der Zeit muss sichtbar werden, dass eine Person tatsächlich Teil der Gesellschaft wird. Integration basiert dabei auf drei grundlegenden Elementen: Arbeit, Sprache und Respekt vor den Regeln der Aufnahmegesellschaft. Arbeit ermöglicht wirtschaftliche Teilhabe. Die Sprache ist der Schlüssel zur sozialen und politischen Teilnahme. Und der Respekt vor den Regeln bildet die Grundlage für ein funktionierendes Zusammenleben. Wenn diese Bedingungen erfüllt sind, hat der Staat ein klares Interesse daran, den Aufenthalt einer Person zu stabilisieren. Integration stärkt sowohl die Gesellschaft als auch die Legitimität der Migrationspolitik. Doch es gibt auch die andere Seite. Wenn ein Integrationsprozess dauerhaft nicht gelingt, muss der Staat auch Instrumente haben, um eine geordnete Rückkehr in das Herkunftsland zu ermöglichen. Genau das bezeichnet der Begriff ReImmigration. Es handelt sich dabei nicht um eine Strafe und auch nicht um eine ideologische Parole. Es ist ein Governance-Prinzip: Eine glaubwürdige Migrationspolitik muss zwei Elemente miteinander verbinden – Integration und Rückkehr. Ohne dieses Gleichgewicht geraten viele Migrationssysteme in Schwierigkeiten. Entweder entstehen große Bereiche faktischer Irregularität, oder es werden Rückführungen angekündigt, die in der Praxis nur begrenzt umgesetzt werden können. Ein integrationsbasiertes Modell verändert diese Logik. Das Prinzip wird klar und verständlich: Wer sich integriert, bleibt. Wer sich nicht integriert, kehrt zurück. In einer Zeit, in der viele europäische Gesellschaften das Vertrauen in ihre Migrationspolitik verloren haben, könnte ein solcher Ansatz dazu beitragen, dieses Vertrauen wiederherzustellen. Vielen Dank, dass Sie diese Folge des Podcasts „Integration oder ReImmigration“ gehört haben. Ich bin Fabio Loscerbo, und wenn Sie mehr über diese Themen erfahren möchten, besuchen Sie www.reimmigrazione.com. Bis zur nächsten Episode.








    Questo episodio include contenuti generati dall’IA.
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins
  • uk Integration as the Key to Immigration Policy the ReImmigration Paradigm
    Mar 15 2026
    Integration as the Key to Immigration Policy: the ReImmigration Paradigm Welcome to a new episode of the podcast “Integration or ReImmigration.”
    My name is Fabio Loscerbo, I am an Italian immigration lawyer, and in this podcast I try to explain how immigration can be governed in a realistic and sustainable way. Today I want to introduce an idea that is central to my work: the ReImmigration paradigm. In the United Kingdom, immigration has been one of the most important political issues of the last decade. From debates around Brexit to discussions about asylum systems and legal migration routes, the topic has remained at the centre of public life. Yet the debate often revolves around two opposing positions. On one side, immigration is discussed mainly in economic terms: businesses need workers, certain sectors rely on foreign labour, and migration is seen as necessary for economic growth. On the other side, the discussion focuses on border control, irregular arrivals and the management of asylum systems. But both approaches frequently overlook a fundamental question: integration. Immigration is not simply about how many people enter a country. It is about whether newcomers actually become part of the society they join. When integration fails, the consequences are visible: social tension, political polarisation and a growing loss of public trust in immigration policy. This is where the concept of ReImmigration comes in. The idea is straightforward: the possibility to remain in a country should be linked to a genuine process of integration. Entering a country legally is only the first step. Over time, it should become clear whether a person is actually participating in the social and economic life of the community. Integration, in practical terms, is built on three basic elements: work, language and respect for the rules of the host society. Work connects a person to the economic system. Language allows participation in public and civic life. And respect for the rules is the foundation of social coexistence. When these conditions exist, the state has a strong interest in stabilising a person’s legal status. Integration strengthens both the individual and the society that receives them. However, there is also the other side of the equation. If integration does not occur over time, the state must also have the ability to organise a structured return to the country of origin. This is what I describe as ReImmigration. It is not a punishment and it is not a political slogan. It is a principle of governance: a credible immigration policy must combine integration and return. Without this balance, migration systems often drift toward two extremes. Either they tolerate large areas of irregularity, or they promise strict deportation policies that prove difficult to implement in practice. An integration-based approach changes the logic entirely. The principle becomes clear and understandable: those who integrate stay; those who do not integrate return. At a time when many European societies are struggling with immigration policy and public confidence in government decisions is under pressure, such a framework may offer a more stable and transparent way to manage migration. Thank you for listening to this episode of “Integration or ReImmigration.” I’m Fabio Loscerbo, and if you would like to explore these ideas further, you can visit www.reimmigrazione.com. See you in the next episode.

    Questo episodio include contenuti generati dall’IA.
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins
  • Integrar para gobernar el principio de la ReInmigración
    Mar 15 2026
    Integrar para gobernar: el principio de la ReInmigración Bienvenidos a un nuevo episodio del podcast “Integración o ReInmigración”.
    Soy Fabio Loscerbo, abogado italiano especializado en derecho de inmigración, y en este podcast intento analizar cómo se puede gobernar la inmigración de manera realista y sostenible. Hoy quiero explicar una idea que está en el centro de mi trabajo: el paradigma de la ReInmigración. En España, como en muchos países europeos, el debate sobre la inmigración suele moverse entre dos posiciones. Por un lado, hay quienes consideran la inmigración principalmente como una necesidad económica: faltan trabajadores en algunos sectores y, por lo tanto, se piensa que la inmigración puede resolver estos problemas. Por otro lado, también existe un debate centrado sobre todo en la seguridad, el control de las fronteras y la inmigración irregular. Sin embargo, ambas visiones suelen dejar de lado una cuestión fundamental: la integración. La inmigración no es simplemente el movimiento de personas de un país a otro. Es un proceso social profundo. La verdadera pregunta no es solo cuántas personas llegan a un país, sino si esas personas llegan a formar parte de la sociedad que las acoge. Cuando la integración no funciona, surgen tensiones sociales. Esto se puede observar en diferentes países europeos y también forma parte del debate político en España, especialmente en relación con la convivencia en determinadas zonas urbanas y con la gestión de los flujos migratorios en el Mediterráneo. Aquí es donde entra el concepto de ReInmigración. La idea es sencilla: la posibilidad de permanecer de forma estable en un país debe estar vinculada a un verdadero proceso de integración. Entrar legalmente en un país es solo el primer paso. Con el tiempo debe demostrarse que la persona participa realmente en la vida de la sociedad. En términos prácticos, la integración se basa en tres elementos fundamentales: trabajo, conocimiento de la lengua y respeto de las reglas de la sociedad de acogida. El trabajo permite la integración económica. La lengua permite participar en la vida social y cívica. Y el respeto de las normas es la base de cualquier convivencia. Cuando estas condiciones existen, el Estado tiene interés en consolidar la situación jurídica del inmigrante. Pero también existe la otra cara del sistema. Si el proceso de integración no se produce, el Estado debe tener mecanismos que permitan un retorno ordenado al país de origen. Eso es precisamente lo que llamo ReInmigración. No se trata de un castigo ni de un eslogan político. Es un principio de gobernanza: una política migratoria creíble debe incluir dos elementos complementarios, integración y retorno. Sin este equilibrio, muchos sistemas migratorios terminan atrapados entre dos extremos: tolerar grandes situaciones de irregularidad o anunciar políticas de expulsión que luego son difíciles de aplicar en la práctica. Un modelo basado en la integración cambia esta lógica. El principio se vuelve claro: quien se integra permanece; quien no se integra regresa. En un momento en el que muchas sociedades europeas están replanteando sus políticas migratorias, este enfoque puede ayudar a recuperar algo fundamental: la confianza de los ciudadanos en la capacidad del Estado para gobernar la inmigración. Gracias por escuchar este episodio del podcast “Integración o ReInmigración”. Soy Fabio Loscerbo, y si quieres profundizar en estos temas puedes visitar el sitio www.reimmigrazione.com. Nos escuchamos en el próximo episodio.

    Questo episodio include contenuti generati dall’IA.
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins
  • Intégrer pour gouverner le principe de la RéImmigration
    Mar 15 2026
    Intégrer pour gouverner : le principe de la RéImmigration Bienvenue dans un nouvel épisode du podcast « Intégration ou RéImmigration ».
    Je suis Fabio Loscerbo, avocat italien spécialisé en droit de l’immigration, et dans ce podcast j’essaie d’analyser le phénomène migratoire avec une approche juridique et réaliste. Aujourd’hui, je voudrais expliquer une idée centrale de mon travail : le paradigme de la RéImmigration. En France, comme dans toute l’Europe, le débat sur l’immigration est souvent structuré autour de deux positions opposées. D’un côté, certains considèrent l’immigration principalement comme une nécessité économique : l’économie a besoin de travailleurs et le vieillissement démographique rend les nouveaux arrivants indispensables. De l’autre côté, une partie du débat politique se concentre surtout sur la sécurité, les frontières et la lutte contre l’immigration irrégulière. Mais ces deux approches laissent souvent de côté une question fondamentale : l’intégration. L’immigration n’est pas seulement un phénomène statistique ou administratif. C’est un processus social profond. La vraie question n’est pas seulement combien de personnes entrent dans un pays, mais si ces personnes deviennent réellement partie de la société qui les accueille. Lorsque l’intégration ne fonctionne pas, les tensions sociales apparaissent presque inévitablement. On le voit dans plusieurs pays européens, y compris en France, où certaines zones urbaines connaissent des difficultés d’intégration qui alimentent le débat politique depuis des années. C’est précisément dans ce contexte que s’inscrit le paradigme de la RéImmigration. L’idée est simple : la possibilité de rester durablement dans un pays doit être liée à un véritable parcours d’intégration. Entrer légalement dans un pays ne suffit pas. Avec le temps, il doit être possible de démontrer une participation réelle à la vie sociale. Concrètement, l’intégration repose sur trois éléments fondamentaux : le travail, la langue et le respect des règles de la société d’accueil. Le travail permet l’insertion dans la vie économique. La langue rend possible la participation à la vie civique et culturelle. Et le respect des règles constitue la base de toute coexistence sociale. Lorsque ces conditions sont réunies, l’État a tout intérêt à stabiliser la situation juridique de la personne étrangère. Mais il existe aussi l’autre face du système. Si le processus d’intégration ne se réalise pas, l’État doit pouvoir mettre en œuvre des mécanismes permettant un retour ordonné dans le pays d’origine. C’est précisément cela que j’appelle la RéImmigration. Il ne s’agit pas d’une sanction ni d’un slogan politique. Il s’agit d’un principe de gouvernance : une politique migratoire crédible doit intégrer deux dimensions complémentaires, l’intégration et le retour. Sans cet équilibre, les systèmes migratoires ont tendance à osciller entre deux extrêmes : soit une tolérance de l’irrégularité, soit des politiques de reconduite qui restent souvent inefficaces dans la pratique. Un modèle fondé sur l’intégration permet au contraire de clarifier la logique du système. Le principe devient simple : ceux qui s’intègrent restent, ceux qui ne s’intègrent pas retournent. Dans une période où les sociétés européennes doivent repenser leurs politiques migratoires, cette approche peut contribuer à restaurer un élément essentiel : la confiance des citoyens dans la capacité de l’État à gouverner l’immigration. Merci d’avoir écouté cet épisode du podcast « Intégration ou RéImmigration ». Je suis Fabio Loscerbo, et si vous souhaitez approfondir ces questions, vous pouvez consulter le site www.reimmigrazione.com. À bientôt pour un prochain épisode.

    Questo episodio include contenuti generati dall’IA.
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins
  • Protezione complementare, integrazione e ReImmigrazione
    Mar 8 2026
    Protezione complementare, integrazione e ReImmigrazione Benvenuti a un nuovo episodio del podcast Integrazione o ReImmigrazione.
    Io sono l’avvocato Fabio Loscerbo. Negli ultimi episodi abbiamo analizzato il rapporto tra protezione complementare e governo dell’immigrazione. Oggi vorrei soffermarmi su un punto che ritengo centrale: il ruolo che la protezione complementare può svolgere nel definire i criteri giuridici attraverso cui uno Stato decide chi può rimanere e chi deve tornare nel proprio Paese di origine. Nel diritto dell’immigrazione, la protezione complementare viene spesso presentata come una forma di tutela residuale rispetto alla protezione internazionale. In realtà, se osserviamo il sistema nel suo complesso, questo istituto svolge una funzione molto più ampia. La protezione complementare interviene infatti quando l’allontanamento dello straniero dal territorio nazionale rischierebbe di violare diritti fondamentali della persona, in particolare il diritto al rispetto della vita privata e familiare. Ciò significa che, nella valutazione della domanda, assumono rilievo elementi come la durata della permanenza nel territorio dello Stato, i legami familiari, le relazioni sociali e l’integrazione lavorativa. In altre parole, l’integrazione diventa un parametro giuridico. È proprio su questo punto che si innesta il paradigma Integrazione o ReImmigrazione. Questo paradigma parte da un’idea molto semplice: la permanenza dello straniero nel territorio dello Stato non può essere priva di presupposti giuridici. Deve essere collegata all’esistenza di un rapporto reale tra la persona e la società ospitante. Quando questo rapporto si realizza attraverso un percorso concreto di integrazione, l’ordinamento dispone di strumenti giuridici – tra cui la protezione complementare – che consentono di riconoscere la legittimità della permanenza dello straniero nel territorio nazionale. Quando invece tale percorso non si realizza, diventa legittimo che lo Stato orienti il sistema verso il ritorno nel Paese di origine. È questo il concetto di ReImmigrazione. È importante chiarire che la ReImmigrazione non coincide con il concetto di remigrazione che spesso circola nel dibattito politico europeo. La remigrazione è generalmente presentata come un progetto politico o ideologico, talvolta associato a rimpatri generalizzati o a politiche di carattere identitario. La ReImmigrazione, invece, è una categoria giuridica. Non presuppone espulsioni indiscriminate e non si fonda su criteri collettivi o ideologici. Al contrario, si basa su una valutazione individuale delle situazioni giuridiche e si colloca pienamente all’interno dello Stato di diritto. Il paradigma Integrazione o ReImmigrazione non propone quindi una contrapposizione tra accoglienza e rimpatrio. Propone piuttosto un equilibrio tra due esigenze fondamentali: da un lato la tutela dei diritti fondamentali della persona, dall’altro la necessità di garantire che la permanenza nel territorio dello Stato sia fondata su presupposti giuridici chiari. In questo equilibrio la protezione complementare assume un ruolo decisivo. Essa diventa uno degli strumenti attraverso cui il diritto dell’immigrazione può distinguere tra situazioni nelle quali la permanenza dello straniero è giuridicamente giustificata e situazioni nelle quali il ritorno nel Paese di origine rappresenta una soluzione coerente con l’ordinamento. Ed è proprio in questo spazio che il paradigma Integrazione o ReImmigrazione può contribuire a costruire una nuova chiave di lettura del diritto dell’immigrazione. Grazie per aver ascoltato questo episodio del podcast Integrazione o ReImmigrazione.
    Io sono l’avvocato Fabio Loscerbo.
    Alla prossima puntata.

    Questo episodio include contenuti generati dall’IA.
    Show More Show Less
    5 mins
  • Complementary Protection, Integration, and ReImmigration – Understanding the European Debate
    Mar 8 2026
    Complementary Protection, Integration, and ReImmigration – Understanding the European Debate Welcome to a new episode of the podcast Integration or ReImmigration.
    My name is Fabio Loscerbo, I am an Italian immigration lawyer. Today I would like to explain an issue that is often discussed in Europe but not always fully understood outside the European legal context: the relationship between complementary protection, integration, and what I call the paradigm Integration or ReImmigration. In the European legal system, immigration law includes different forms of protection for foreign nationals. The most well known are refugee status and subsidiary protection, which are forms of international protection based on persecution or serious harm. However, there is another important legal instrument called complementary protection. This type of protection applies when a person cannot qualify as a refugee but removing that person from the country would still violate fundamental rights. For example, European courts often consider whether expulsion would violate the right to private and family life. This means that judges may evaluate how long a person has lived in the country, whether they have family ties, social relationships, or stable employment. In other words, integration becomes a legal factor. This is where the paradigm Integration or ReImmigration comes into play. The idea behind this paradigm is quite simple. Every state must define the conditions under which a foreign national can remain part of its society. Immigration cannot be governed only by emergency responses or political slogans; it requires legal criteria. If a person has developed a real path of integration — through work, social relationships, language, and respect for the rules — the legal system may recognize the legitimacy of that person’s presence in the country. Complementary protection can become one of the legal tools used in these situations. But if such a process of integration does not exist, the legal system may legitimately move toward what I call ReImmigration. It is important to clarify something here, especially for an American audience. ReImmigration is not the same as what in some European political debates is called remigration. Remigration is often used as a political or ideological concept, sometimes referring to large-scale return policies or demographic restructuring. ReImmigration is something different. It is not a political project and it is not about mass deportations. It is a legal concept. ReImmigration simply means that when a person has not developed a real connection with the host society, the natural legal outcome of the immigration system may be the return to the country of origin. So the paradigm Integration or ReImmigration is not about choosing between open borders and mass expulsions. It is about building a balanced legal framework. On one side, the system must protect fundamental rights and recognize the position of individuals who have genuinely integrated into society. On the other side, the system must preserve the ability of the state to regulate immigration flows and maintain legal coherence. From this perspective, complementary protection becomes more than just a humanitarian safeguard. It becomes one of the legal mechanisms through which immigration systems distinguish between cases where staying is justified and cases where returning is legally appropriate. And this is exactly where the paradigm Integration or ReImmigration may offer a new framework for understanding immigration law in Europe. Thank you for listening to this episode of the podcast Integration or ReImmigration.
    My name is Fabio Loscerbo.
    See you in the next episode.

    Questo episodio include contenuti generati dall’IA.
    Show More Show Less
    4 mins