
Quarterly Essay 87: Uncivil Wars
How Contempt Is Corroding Democracy
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy Now for $14.99
-
Narrated by:
-
Scott Stephens
About this listen
Is our democracy corroding? In this eloquent original essay, Waleed Aly and Scott Stephens explore the ethics and politics of public debate—and the threat it now faces.
In a healthy society we need the capacity to disagree. Yet Aly and Stephens note a growing tendency to disdain and dismiss opponents, to treat them with contempt. This toxic partisanship has been imported from the United States, where it has been a temptation for both left and right. Aly and Stephens discuss some telling examples, analyse the role of the media, and look back to heroes of democracy who found a better way forward.
Arguing that democracy cannot survive contempt, they draw on philosophy, literature and history to make an urgent case about the present.
‘So what do we owe those with whom we might profoundly, even radically, disagree? In our time, the answer increasingly seems to be: Nothing. Absolutely nothing. We've come to regard our opponents as not much more than obstructions in the road, impediments standing between us and our desired end. We have grown disinclined to consider what it might mean to go on together meaningfully as partners within a shared democratic project. To put it bluntly, we see no future with our political opponents because we feel we have nothing to learn from them.’ (Waleed Aly & Scott Stephens, Uncivil Wars)
Waleed Aly is a writer, academic, lawyer and broadcaster. He is a lecturer in politics at Monash University and a co-host of Network Ten’s The Project. He is the author of People Like Us and Quarterly Essay 37: What’s Right? With Scott Stephens, he co-hosts Radio National’s The Minefield program.
Scott Stephens is the online editor of Religion and Ethics for the ABC. He has been a lecturer in theology and ethics, and is editor of several books.
©2022 Waleed Aly and Scott Stephens (P)2022 Audible Australia Pty Ltd.A must read to save our Democracy
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Rings true, but...
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Insightful and thought-provoking
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
In general I find Waleed Ali's work on the ABC very insightful, but this overly dramatic narration by the co-author is exhausting and patronising to listen to.
There's some interesting pieces of history. but they are common knowledge, meanwhile we're told how to analyse recent history. I know, I was there, and don't need to see it through your lens. Using something as an example is one thing, and contextually is great, but having someone with a condescending teacher-like style prattle on as if we're eight years old is not enjoyable.
Maybe this would have been better with Waleed's style, maybe this would have been better with a one hour time limit, but really this is disappointing, especially considering both of them work in radio, and (having done so myself for over 20+ years), there's a time limit for everything. You also have to sell the point, keep the audience engaged and have something interesting to say - unfortunately this piece has none of those key attributes.
Repetition in desperate need of an edit!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
This program examines how society has embraced and accepted contempt as a means through social media and the mass media.
It’s a fascinating at a possibly very scary future where people don’t compromise but instead go to conflict over their views and see the opposite side as “the evil one to be destroyed”.
Give this a listen, I think you’ll agree afterwards we all need to try and do better for each other instead of hating each other.
A very important listen and a serious warning.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Irgent refections on ethics, contempt, and democracy
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Yeah the rest was good too.
Mmmmmmm
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
The categorisation of 3 (overlapping) kinds of contempt seems a little awkward to my mind - but it did work successfully as a vehicle for presenting and differentiating some of the concepts in the essay. The argument regarding "the air" in which we see contempt arise in today's social settings, and why this is relevant with regard to the validity (or non-validity) of contempt, is particularly insightful.
While defining contempt, Aly and Stephens write:
"... contempt by it's very nature marks the end of a conversation. It's a full stop."
Engaging content, excellent narration
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Excellent
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Politically charged crybabies
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.