YesToHellWith cover art

YesToHellWith

YesToHellWith

By: and may TRUTH reign supreme!
Listen for free

Summary

 YesToHellWith is determined to expose the wrongful conviction and imprisonment of Orlando Carter. We are asking that President Trump review this injustice and exonerate Carter.

yestohellwith.substack.comyestohellwith Political Science Politics & Government
Episodes
  • Let's Look at Glassman and Parker

    Let's Look at Glassman and Parker
    May 8 2026

    It’s May 8, 2026. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

    Over the past several weeks, we have discussed the structure of prosecution in America.

    We have discussed:plea bargaining,prosecutorial immunity,withholding of evidence,courtroom pressure,and why so many defendants lose long before trial ever begins.

    But next week —we are going to move from theory to example.

    A real federal example.

    An example involving a man named Orlando Carter.

    And two federal prosecutors who had the power to stop an injustice —but did not.

    Former United States Attorneys:Benjamin Glassman.And Kenneth Parker.

    These men occupied positions of enormous authority inside the federal system.

    And yet the question remains:

    What happens when prosecutors are presented with evidence of a wrongful prosecution —and choose institutional protection over the interests of justice?

    Next week, we are going to examine how the federal system failed an innocent man.

    Not emotionally.Not rhetorically.But structurally.

    Because if justice depends entirely upon the discretion of prosecutors —then what happens when that discretion fails?

    Next week, we begin examining the Orlando Carter case.

    And as always —may truth reign supreme.



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    2 mins
  • Duplicate my efforts!

    Duplicate my efforts!
    May 8 2026

    It’s May 8, 2026. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.

    First, an important announcement regarding FreeConferenceCall.com.

    Many of you may have noticed that the FreeConferenceCall.com website is currently displaying a browser security warning indicating possible malware or security concerns. I have personally used FreeConferenceCall.com for nearly twenty years, and they have been an excellent company throughout that time.

    They have acknowledged the issue and indicated that they are working to resolve it quickly. I have also requested additional information and a public update from the company, but at this point I have not yet received a response.

    Out of caution, next week’s Liberty Dialogues conference call will likely be moved to Zoom while we monitor the situation. Most people are already familiar with Zoom, so the transition should be simple.

    Also, there will be no conference call tomorrow, Saturday. The next Liberty Dialogues and AI conference call will be this coming Tuesday.

    Now another important point.

    I am receiving a tremendous number of requests from people seeking help with lawsuits, administrative issues, court filings, and personal matters. Please understand clearly — I cannot personally respond to every request that comes in.

    But what I can tell you is this:

    The Liberty Dialogues framework combined with AI is becoming extraordinarily effective for people who take the time to properly learn and apply it.

    People are learning how to use the Liberty Dialogues structure —Authority.Jurisdiction.Status.Standing.Obligation.Enforcement.Under the umbrella of presumption —

    to create disciplined, organized responses for agencies and courts using AI within that framework.

    That is precisely why I created:the SOU4U package,the Liberty Dialogues series,and the new Liberty Dialogues Practical Guide series.

    If you truly want to understand how these systems operate and learn how to respond structurally and intelligently, then get the books and begin learning the process for yourself.

    And for those who need direct one-on-one assistance, private consultations are available.

    For more information, email:info@yestohellwith.com

    And as always —may truth reign supreme



    Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    3 mins
  • What to Do in Court.

    What to Do in Court.
    May 7 2026
    This video is for May 7, 2026. Welcome to yestohellwith.com.Today, we are going to discuss something that most people never think about until they are standing in a courtroom under pressure.How do you slow the process down when the judge is moving too quickly?Now understand this carefully.The courtroom operates on momentum.Cases are called rapidly.People are expected to respond immediately.The judge controls the pace.And most defendants become overwhelmed before they ever regain their composure.This is especially true for pro per defendants.Because the environment itself creates pressure:the judge,the prosecutor,the deputies,the procedure,and the courtroom itself.And under pressure—people panic.They begin reacting emotionally.They begin agreeing to things they do not fully understand.And they begin losing control of themselves.So today we are going to discuss some realistic ways to slow the process down without becoming combative or disrespectful.Now understand—the goal is not to “beat the judge.”The goal is not endless argument.And the goal is certainly not hostility toward the court.The goal is to create enough space for clarity.That is the purpose.One of the first things a pro per defendant should understand is that courts recognize, at least in principle, that a self-represented litigant does not possess the training of an attorney.This is why cases such as Haines v. Kerner are often referenced.Not because they magically solve problems—but because they acknowledge a basic reality:a pro per defendant lacks formal legal training.And once that reality is acknowledged,the pace should change.The court should understand that the defendant may require clarification, patience, or reasonable procedural latitude in order to participate meaningfully.Now this does not mean the judge becomes your advocate.And it does not mean the court gives legal advice.But it does mean fairness requires restraint and patience.So one practical approach is to calmly remind the court of your pro per status early in the proceeding.For example:“Your Honor, I respectfully ask the Court to recognize that I am appearing pro per and do not possess the training or experience of licensed counsel. I ask for reasonable procedural latitude so that I may meaningfully participate and preserve my rights.”Notice the tone.Calm.Measured.Respectful.No hostility.No accusation.Now another practical way to slow the process is ensuring that the record is preserved.Because once everyone understands the record matters,the pace often becomes more deliberate.The judge knows the record matters.The prosecutor knows the record matters.This is not manipulation.This is accountability.Now there are also situations where the judge becomes impatient or aggressive.And when that happens,most people emotionally collapse.They either become submissive,or combative.Both are mistakes.Instead,the proper response is calm restraint.For example:“Your Honor, I am attempting to proceed respectfully and carefully. I ask for patience so that I may properly understand and respond.”Or:“Your Honor, I do not intend disrespect. I am attempting to preserve clarity and avoid misunderstanding.”Notice again—the goal is not confrontation.The goal is to reduce pressure while preserving composure.Now another important point involves judicial ethics and courtroom conduct.A calm reference to fairness and meaningful participation can sometimes encourage the court to moderate its tone without direct accusation.For example:“Your Honor, I am attempting to participate meaningfully and respectfully in the proceeding, and I ask the Court’s patience as I do so.”That statement subtly invokes fairness without openly attacking the judge.And psychologically,that matters.Because many judges do not want the appearance of hostility toward a self-represented defendant preserved on the record.Now understand this carefully.None of these approaches are magical.None guarantee outcomes.And none place you in control of the courtroom.The judge still controls the courtroom.But what these approaches can do is:slow momentum,reduce pressure,preserve clarity,and help you maintain composure.And that matters far more than most people realize.Because once a person psychologically collapses in court,the rest of the proceeding usually becomes reaction.The Liberty Dialogues is not about magical phrases or courtroom theatrics.It is about structure.Discipline.Clarity.And maintaining composure under pressure.That is the lesson.And as always—May truth reign supreme. Get full access to YesToHellWith at yestohellwith.substack.com/subscribe
    Show More Show Less
    7 mins
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_c
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.