Welcome back to Now I Get It. In this episode, I break down a term we hear all the time in national security conversations but rarely slow down to understand: harm’s way. I explore how this concept is traditionally defined in U.S. military policy, why it matters, and how it’s being challenged by the current use of remote warfare. Using the recent drone-led attacks in the Caribbean as a backdrop, I look at what happens when technology distances human operators from physical danger—yet still places the country itself in profound geopolitical risk.

I also dig into the overlooked consequences of attacking vessels on the open sea, why the flag a boat flies carries legal and military implications, and how these actions can provoke entirely justified responses from nation-states. From asymmetric warfare to murky acts of sabotage and drone incursions, I explore how conflicts escalate without ever being formally declared—and how decisions made far from the battlefield ripple out to place the entire U.S. military, and even the country, in harm’s way.

In this episode, you will learn:

(00:00) Why “harm’s way” matters in today’s military decisions

(00:23) How drone warfare challenges the War Powers Act

(01:03) Why attacking a flagged vessel is an act of war

(01:45) How asymmetric warfare enables covert retaliation

(02:28) Why murky attacks blur responsibility in global conflict

(03:14) How U.S. drone strikes put the entire military at risk

Let’s connect!

linktr.ee/drprandy

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.