In this episode of Daily Story Brief, the hosts take you inside an extraordinarily tense weekend of diplomacy in Geneva, where American and Ukrainian officials scramble to salvage a U.S.-backed 28-point peace framework for ending the nearly four-year Russia-Ukraine war. What was billed as a bold peace initiative has instead sparked alarm in Kyiv, outrage across Europe, and accusations that Washington is quietly pushing a “Russian wish list” on its own ally.

The conversation starts with the battlefield reality driving this rush for a deal: Ukraine has lost hundreds of square kilometers in recent weeks, and the White House has set an aggressive Thanksgiving deadline for Kyiv to accept a draft that many in Ukraine see as nothing short of surrender. From there, the episode pulls apart the most explosive provisions of the original plan – sweeping territorial concessions beyond current front lines, a constitutional ban on NATO membership, strict caps on the size of Ukraine’s armed forces, and a prohibition on long-range missiles that would leave the country structurally weaker and vulnerable to future aggression.

The hosts then zoom in on the clause that triggered a moral shockwave: a blanket post-war amnesty for all parties, effectively wiping away accountability for atrocities in places like Bucha. You hear the raw reactions from soldiers at the front and survivors visiting mass graves, torn between the desperate desire for the war to end and the horror of being asked to “forgive” without justice. The episode also traces how these provisions ignited a political firestorm in Washington and European capitals, with lawmakers and security experts warning that the plan risks repeating the mistakes of the Budapest Memorandum and undermining the very principle that borders cannot be changed by force.

Beyond the military and moral questions, the episode exposes the financial engineering buried inside the blueprint. The hosts unpack the proposal to use frozen Russian central bank assets held in Europe for a U.S.-led reconstruction scheme that would deliver significant profits to American interests and channel remaining funds into a joint U.S.-Russian investment vehicle. They explore why this structure infuriated European leaders, who see it as rewarding the aggressor, shifting legal risk onto the EU, and intertwining private profit with peacemaking.

As the narrative returns to Geneva, the episode explains how Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Ukrainian officials Andriy Yermak and Rustem Umerov, and their teams tried to rewrite the document under enormous time pressure and political scrutiny. The joint statement that followed promised a revised framework that reflects Ukrainian national interests and provides “credible and enforceable” security guarantees – but offered almost no detail on whether the most controversial points on territory, military limits, and amnesty were truly removed or merely repackaged.

Finally, the hosts step back and ask the bigger strategic questions: What leverage does the U.S. really have over Moscow if Russia believes time and territory are on its side? What does an ironclad security guarantee for a non-NATO Ukraine actually look like in real-world terms? And at what point does a peace deal stop being peace and start looking like surrender disguised as diplomacy?

If you want a clear, unsparing guide to one of the most consequential – and contested – peace efforts of the war, this episode lays out the stakes, the flaws, and the unresolved questions behind the Geneva talks, and asks what kind of agreement could deliver not just quiet for a season, but a genuinely durable peace.