Do the Gospels contradict each other?

It’s one of the most common objections to Christianity—especially around the events of Holy Week, the crucifixion, and the resurrection. Critics point to differences in the accounts and claim the story falls apart under scrutiny.

But what if the problem isn’t with the Gospels…

What if it’s with how we’re reading them?

In this follow-up to ULP Q&A The Easter Episode, we step back and take a different approach. Instead of chasing every individual question in isolation, we look at the bigger issue: how to understand the nature of Scripture itself.

What does it mean that the Bible is inerrant and infallible?

Are the Gospels meant to be frame-by-frame historical transcripts—or something else?

And how do multiple eyewitness accounts actually work in real life?

Through clear reasoning, practical examples, and a biblical framework, this episode shows why differences in the Gospel accounts don’t weaken the truth—they reinforce it.

From the anointing of Jesus to the empty tomb, we walk through the most common “contradictions” and see how they fit together into a consistent, reliable, and compelling picture of what really happened.

Because the question isn’t whether the Gospels say exactly the same thing—

The question is whether they tell the truth.

And they do.