They’re Not Failing the System. They’re Stripping It for Parts cover art

They’re Not Failing the System. They’re Stripping It for Parts

They’re Not Failing the System. They’re Stripping It for Parts

Listen for free

View show details

About this listen

 Disclaimer: Side effects may include laughter and/or anger. Read or watch at your own risk.We begin where the wreckage is freshest and the intent is easiest to miss: the newly released Epstein files. Not because they reveal some occult master plan, but because they show—coldly, bureaucratically—how a system processes damage it doesn’t intend to fix.You need to know where everything happening today came from—because it didn’t come from Congress, or a party platform, or some late-night fever dream. It came from YouTube. You’ll want to pay close attention because this is the kind of cool school you can only get on the Cary Harrison files.Beginning in the early 2020s—roughly 2020 through 2022—a cluster of long-form YouTube lectures and podcasts started circulating, calmly and confidently, arguing that democracy was obsolete. Not corrupt. Not misguided. Obsolete. The world, they said, had become too complex, too fast, too dangerous for consent. What nations needed instead was order—national coordination, elite planning, and discipline without debate.They gave it a name: “American National Socialism.”Not socialism for workers. Not equality. Socialism for order. Yes, this is socialism. German war-flavored but with a very modern twist.These weren’t fringe YouTube screamers. They were hours-long presentations with neutral lighting, academic tone, and managerial ambition—treating politics as an engineering problem and citizens as variables. Democracy was reframed as noise. Rights as inefficiencies. Participation as sentimental clutter. The solution was always the same: central coordination, insulated from the public, justified by crisis.This wasn’t a single video or a lone crank. It was a networked ideology—thinkers, funders, podcasters, policy hobbyists—cross-posting, cross-referencing, and refining the pitch. Over time, the arguments hardened. The language cleaned up. The destination stayed fixed.Those videos became the template—the rehearsal space where ideas too naked for policy were normalized, softened, and stress-tested. By the time similar language showed up in politics, finance, and tech, the public had already heard it. The shock was gone. The surrender rehearsed.So when you hear calls for “coordination,” “stability,” “capacity,” and “hard choices,” understand this: you’re hearing YouTube ideas grown up, dressed for work, and walking into power.That’s the origin story.The Cary Harrison Files is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Read the Epstein files and you don’t see urgency. You see containment. Allegations logged. Credibility quietly hedged. Corroboration requested and never pursued with vigor. The file closes not with justice, but with administrative relief. Not nothing happened—but nothing actionable will happen. That distinction is everything.Because what those files actually document is a skill the modern system has perfected: how to survive scandal without changing structure. How to absorb horror, manage liability, and keep walking. This is not failure. This is training.That’s why Epstein matters—not as myth, not as mascot, but as proof of exemption. Proof that there exists a tier where rules are optional, consequences negotiable, and bodies instrumental. Even his most grotesque, documented fascinations—his talk of heredity, “seeding,” where he would impregnate hundreds of these hostage girls to see the world with improved humans with his DNA… These ideas were never treated as alarms. Mr. Musk has already done this with a number of women. They were treated as eccentricities. As rich-man noise. Not because the ideas were harmless, but because the system had already decided who mattered.This is where the through-line becomes visible.Long before Silicon Valley, before dashboards and APIs, the same impulse wore a different uniform. Classic German eugenics didn’t begin with camps; it began with order. With classification. With the belief that society could be optimized if only the right inputs were elevated and the wrong ones managed. Compassion was inefficiency. Equality was sentiment. Order—order above all—was virtue.That ideology didn’t die. It modernized.It stopped talking about blood and started talking about data. It stopped saying purity and started saying performance. It stopped saying elimination and started saying eligibility. Same hierarchy. Cleaner language.Today it has a respectable name: technocracy.Technocracy claims politics are engineering problems. That society should be run by experts insulated from the public. That outcomes matter more than consent. Democracy, in this frame, isn’t immoral—it’s inefficient. Too loud. Too slow. Too emotional for a complex world.But here’s the pivot most people miss: technocracy does not want to fix democracy. It wants to outgrow it—and then replace it.And to do that, the old ...
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.