Episodes

  • Pomp, Perversion, and Poppers: The Ghislaine Maxwell Party at Sandringham (11/5/25)

    Pomp, Perversion, and Poppers: The Ghislaine Maxwell Party at Sandringham (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    Prince Andrew’s decision to host a party for Ghislaine Maxwell at Sandringham—where sex drugs like poppers were reportedly found—reads less like royal history and more like a bad dark comedy. The idea of a Queen’s residence being turned into something resembling a low-rent Sopranos episode is almost surreal. The whole scene feels like parody: the Duke of York, standing beneath portraits of British monarchs, presiding over a soirée that sounds like Downton Abbey crashing headfirst into Trainspotting. It’s especially grotesque given Epstein’s reputation for avoiding drugs himself—he didn’t need them, he used them on others. The thought of those same tools of control and exploitation making their way into a royal estate is equal parts absurd and revolting.

    What makes it worse is the total lack of accountability. The Palace still tries to frame these scandals as “private matters,” as though international sex trafficking and narcotics at royal residences can be brushed under the Windsor rug. Every new revelation cements Andrew as a man incapable of understanding—or even pretending to care about—the damage he’s done to the Crown’s image. Once considered a symbol of British decorum, Sandringham now sits as a monument to how far the monarchy has fallen, its history tainted by the stench of scandal and the arrogance of a prince who believed himself untouchable. In the end, Prince Andrew didn’t just disgrace himself—he made royal scandal feel like a recurring sketch in a show that refuses to end.



    to contact me:



    source:

    Sex drugs 'found at party' disgraced Andrew hosted for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in Sandringham, new Royal book claims | Daily Mail Online
    Show More Show Less
    16 mins
  • Alex Acosta Goes To Congress: Transcripts From The Alex Acosta Deposition (Part 10) (11/5/25)

    Alex Acosta Goes To Congress: Transcripts From The Alex Acosta Deposition (Part 10) (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    When Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal trial might have been too risky because victims were “unreliable” and evidence was “thin.” In reality, federal prosecutors had a mountain of corroborating witness statements, corroborative travel logs, and sworn victim testimony—yet Acosta gave Epstein the deal of the century. The so-called non-prosecution agreement wasn’t justice; it was a backroom surrender, executed in secrecy, without even notifying the victims. When pressed on this, Acosta spun excuses about legal precedent and “jurisdictional confusion,” never once admitting the obvious: his office protected a rich, politically connected predator at the expense of dozens of trafficked girls.

    Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive
    Show More Show Less
    14 mins
  • Alex Acosta Goes To Congress: Transcripts From The Alex Acosta Deposition (Part 9) (11/5/25)

    Alex Acosta Goes To Congress: Transcripts From The Alex Acosta Deposition (Part 9) (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    When Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal trial might have been too risky because victims were “unreliable” and evidence was “thin.” In reality, federal prosecutors had a mountain of corroborating witness statements, corroborative travel logs, and sworn victim testimony—yet Acosta gave Epstein the deal of the century. The so-called non-prosecution agreement wasn’t justice; it was a backroom surrender, executed in secrecy, without even notifying the victims. When pressed on this, Acosta spun excuses about legal precedent and “jurisdictional confusion,” never once admitting the obvious: his office protected a rich, politically connected predator at the expense of dozens of trafficked girls.

    Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces.



    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive
    Show More Show Less
    12 mins
  • Bill Clinton Has Time for Everything Except His Epstein Deposition (11/5/25)

    Bill Clinton Has Time for Everything Except His Epstein Deposition (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    Bill Clinton continues to dodge a formal deposition about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein despite having ample time for public appearances, marathons, and speeches. The same lawmakers who claim that “no one is above the law” have shown no urgency in questioning the former president who welcomed Epstein to the White House seventeen times, accepted his seed money for the Clinton Foundation, and invited Ghislaine Maxwell to his daughter’s wedding. While they posture about accountability, their silence and inaction reveal a political double standard that shields their own. Clinton’s carefully managed image — complete with polished smiles and “I don’t recall” evasions — remains intact because those in power prefer the illusion of justice to the risk of truth.


    The spectacle has become political theater. Committees hold hearings, the media offers soft profiles, and the powerful continue to protect each other while victims are left waiting for real answers. Clinton’s absence from the witness chair is more than an oversight — it’s proof that justice in America operates on a sliding scale determined by status and influence. Every public event he attends is a reminder that accountability is optional for the elite, and every unasked question deepens the rot at the core of the system that claims to serve justice but exists only to preserve power.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show More Show Less
    17 mins
  • Former Prince Andrew And His Many Delusions (11/5/25)

    Former Prince Andrew And His Many Delusions (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    Prince Andrew has long clung to the idea of a return to public royal life, despite mounting evidence that such a comeback is all but impossible. His self-belief that he could simply “ride the scandal out” and resume duties stems from pre-2019 days when he was a visible working royal. But after his disastrous BBC interview in November 2019 — widely regarded as a major turning point in his fall from grace — his hope of a return entered the realm of fantasy. One commentator called his plans “delusional” and argued that Andrew was still under the illusion that a few apologies or media appearances could restore his status.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show More Show Less
    17 mins
  • Prince Andrew And The Failed Come Back Plans (11/5/25)

    Prince Andrew And The Failed Come Back Plans (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    Prince Andrew’s attempted comebacks—whether through soft public reappearances or entrepreneurial ventures—have repeatedly stumbled amid persistent scandal and institutional resistance. His early efforts, such as signaling interest in low-profile engagements or charitable causes, were mostly ignored by the Palace and public alike. Even when he quietly attended family events or public ceremonies, he remained under tight constraints: his appearances were limited, carefully managed, and rarely fully public. Meanwhile, the release of fresh documents and resurfacing allegations have continuously punched holes in any rehabilitative narrative he might try to spin.


    On the business front, Andrew has tried to monetize his royal network, but results have been underwhelming. A reported deal with a Dutch startup firm—meant to leverage his “Pitch@Palace” brand and connections—failed to yield any signed contracts or tangible outcomes. Critics and royal watchers say the venture underscores how his appeal is now more a liability than an asset. Rather than a comeback, his attempts have exposed just how toxic the Epstein association remains—and how powerless he has become to reverse the damage.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show More Show Less
    11 mins
  • Prince Andrew And The Sorry State Of His Finances (11/4/25)

    Prince Andrew And The Sorry State Of His Finances (11/4/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    Prince Andrew’s financial troubles have become one of the most public and humiliating aspects of his downfall. Once lavishly funded by his mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, the Duke of York reportedly saw his annual royal allowance — estimated at around £1 million — cut off after King Charles III took the throne. He also lost taxpayer-funded security and several lucrative privileges tied to his former royal duties. Without steady income or official role, Andrew has struggled to sustain his opulent lifestyle at the 30-room Royal Lodge, where upkeep alone costs hundreds of thousands of pounds annually. He was even forced to sell his £18 million Swiss chalet to pay off debts, including his multi-million-dollar settlement to Virginia Giuffre.

    By 2024 and 2025, reports described Andrew as “cash-poor and asset-rich,” leaning on the goodwill of friends and former associates to stay afloat. His private investment firm was shuttered, his business ventures fizzled, and he was said to be relying on sporadic stipends from King Charles to cover basic expenses. Some media reports claim that the King is reluctantly considering a small annual payment to help Andrew relocate from Royal Lodge — a stark contrast to his previous royal privilege. What was once a life of near-unlimited luxury has become a slow-motion financial collapse, with the disgraced Duke reduced to scraping together funds while clinging to the last symbols of royal comfort.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protnmail.com
    Show More Show Less
    21 mins
  • Joseph Manzaro Walks Back His Allegations That Included Beyoncé And Jay-Z (11/5/25)

    Joseph Manzaro Walks Back His Allegations That Included Beyoncé And Jay-Z (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    ​Joseph Manzaro, who previously alleged that Jay-Z and Beyoncé witnessed his assault at a 2015 party hosted by Sean "Diddy" Combs, has amended his lawsuit to remove any mention of the celebrity couple. This change follows evidence presented by Jay-Z's legal team demonstrating that the couple was not present at the Miami event in question. Documentation confirmed that Jay-Z was in New York for a public appearance at New York University, and both he and Beyoncé were later photographed vacationing in Hawaii during the time of the alleged incident. In response, Jay-Z's attorney, Alex Spiro, criticized the initial claims as baseless and damaging to the justice system's integrity.

    Despite the removal of Jay-Z and Beyoncé from the complaint, Manzaro maintains his allegations against other individuals, including Emilio Estefan and former adult film actress Adria English. He continues to assert that he was drugged, transported to Combs' residence, and subjected to non-consensual acts during the party. Representatives for the Estefans and LeBron James, who was also mentioned in the original complaint, have denied any involvement, with James' spokesperson labeling the claims as demonstrably false. Combs' legal team has dismissed the lawsuit as a fabrication aimed at garnering publicity and financial gain, emphasizing that Combs looks forward to addressing these allegations in court.


    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Sean 'Diddy' Combs Accuser Drops Beyoncé and Jay-Z's Names from Sexual Assault Lawsuit
    Show More Show Less
    17 mins