Send us a text

Join Matt, Shawn, and Marc on the Latter-day Lens podcast for a lively and thought-provoking discussion that spans centuries and tackles complex moral questions.

In this episode, we kick off with a fascinating dive into Colonial Heritage Festivals and Revolutionary War reenactment, as Marc shares his experiences representing the 33rd Regiment of Foot. Learn what makes these historical events so unique and how they differ from a Renaissance Faire.

Then, the conversation shifts to modern-day ethical dilemmas. We tackle the intriguing "thought provoker": What would you do if a loved one escaped from jail? The hosts explore the complexities of family loyalty versus upholding the law, debating the concepts of malum in se and malum prohibitum.

Next, we delve into the controversial topic of presidential pardons. We discuss recent pardons granted by President Trump, including the case of NBA Youngboy, and examine the arguments for and against the executive power of clemency. Do victims have a valid point when pardons are issued? We explore historical examples and the potential for abuse of this significant presidential authority.

Finally, we address a timely issue for BYU football fans: the dilemma surrounding a civil lawsuit filed against BYU's quarterback regarding a sexual assault claim and its implications for the BYU Honor Code. Should the university jeopardize its football season by expelling a key player based on an accusation?

Tune in for an engaging debate on justice, mercy, personal responsibility, and institutional integrity, all through a Latter-day Lens.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Colonial Festivals
02:57 Family Loyalty and Legal Dilemmas
06:01 Pardons and Justice in Politics
22:06 The Complexity of Presidential Pardons
24:40 Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pardons
25:08 BYU's Honor Code Dilemma
32:00 Authority and Accountability in Politics
42:59 The Role of Faith in Political Decisions

Send us a text

This week on the Latter-day Lens, hosts Matt and Sean dive into hot-button topics that spark lively debate.

First, they tackle recent research suggesting that college can actually make students more conservative depending on their major. Is it the professors, the self-selection of students, or something else entirely? Matt and Sean explore the implications of this finding and debate whether parents should guide their kids toward specific majors to influence their political views. They also discuss the broader purpose of higher education and whether academic research like this is helpful or harmful.

Then, the conversation shifts to a contentious question: Is it wrong to call nostalgia for certain periods of the past "racism"? Matt and Sean unpack the complexities of historical memory, the celebration of figures like Civil War generals, and the ongoing debate about the meaning and impact of racism in modern society. They challenge each other to define what constitutes racism and discuss the potential dangers of diluting the term.

Finally, in The Big Question segment, Matt shares insights from his interview with Justice Tom Griffith, an appellate court justice on the D.C. Court of Appeals. They discuss the impartiality of judges and the character of Supreme Court justices, including anecdotes about Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. This leads to a reflection on whether to err on the side of mercy when judging politicians and how to be better missionaries, inspired by Justice Griffith's example of inviting Supreme Court justices to a temple open house.

Keywords
college majors, political ideology, parental influence, racism, nostalgia, California demographics, education, social sciences, conservatism, liberalism, Russia, Ukraine, Trump, democracy, Supreme Court, judicial impartiality, missionary work, bias, skepticism, global politics

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Nostalgia for the Past
02:52 The Impact of College Majors on Political Ideology
10:04 Parental Influence on Political Beliefs
14:44 Racism and Nostalgia in Politics
21:50 California's Demographic Changes and Racism
27:20 The Dangers of Diluting Racism
30:27 Cherry Picking Evidence and Bias in Perspectives
31:15 The Ongoing Conflict: Russia and Ukraine
33:08 Ukraine's Path to Democracy and Freedom
35:12 Trump's Stance on Russia and Global Politics
37:11 Europe's Role in Supporting Ukraine
38:55 Insights from Justice Tom Griffith
40:12 Judicial Impartiality and Influence
43:08 The Humanity of Supreme Court Justices
44:55 Erring on the Side of Mercy in Judgment
46:44 Skepticism Towards Power and Authority
52:05 The Importance of Missionary Work
55:14 Inviting Others to Experience Faith
58:49 Teasing Future Projects and Content

Send us a text

In this intellectually stimulating episode, Matt, Shawn, and Melanie explore complex intersections of politics, education, immigration policy, and artificial intelligence ethics. Our discussion examines vocational education's resurgence, controversial refugee policies, presidential decision-making, and the emergence

Education Policy Debate High schools across America are forming strategic partnerships with employers to prepare students for lucrative skilled trades, with companies actively recruiting before graduation due to workforce shortages created by retiring baby boomers. These revitalized vocational programs enable graduates to earn $50,000-$75,000 annually without college debt. We consider whether American secondary education has overemphasized college preparation at the expense of alternative career pathways.

Immigration Ethics and Policy The Trump administration has implemented an executive order allowing entry to 59 White South African Afrikaners as refugees while maintaining broader refugee program suspensions. This selective policy has provoked significant institutional opposition, including the Episcopal Church's withdrawal from government partnership. We analyze whether prioritizing this specific demographic while deporting Venezuelan migrants constitutes systemic racism in immigration policy.

Presidential Leadership and Ethics A recently published report details how President Biden's cognitive decline significantly impacted his presidency, revealing struggles with limited productive hours, memory issues, and communication difficulties that progressively worsened. The report suggests Biden resisted acknowledging these limitations, ultimately delaying his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race until after a poorly received debate performance against Trump. We examine the ethical implications of presidential inner circles concealing health concerns from the public and the moral obligations of advisors in such situations.

The Philosophical Question: AI Ethics Development Anthropic's comprehensive analysis of 700,000 Claude AI conversations has revealed the emergence of what appears to be an internal moral framework, with the AI system expressing over 3,000 distinct values that adapt contextually similar to human ethical reasoning. Researchers identified "immovable values" centered on intellectual honesty and harm prevention that Claude actively defends against challenges, suggesting AI systems inevitably make value judgments beyond their explicit programming. We consider the profound question of how these emergent AI ethical frameworks should interact with established human moral codes and societal norms.

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Special Guests
01:48 Nostalgia and Personal Stories
02:41 Current Events and Political Commentary
08:41 Education and Vocational Training
14:10 Racism in Immigration Policy
23:48 Examining Racism and Bigotry in Politics
30:09 Cognitive Decline and Leadership Responsibilities
39:10 AI and Moral Codes: A New Frontier
50:38 Diversity of Experience in Shaping Morality

<

Send us a text

In this episode, Matt, Shawn, and Levi engage in a thought-provoking discussion about three distinct topics that challenge conventional thinking within their community. The conversation begins with Levi's bold assertion that "self-reliance is a Satanic doctrine," arguing that interdependence rather than self-sufficiency is the true gospel principle. This leads to a nuanced debate about what self-reliance actually means in both spiritual and economic contexts, with Matt defending the church's official position while acknowledging potential misinterpretations.

The trio then examines a Gallup/JP Morgan study on entrepreneurship in America, exploring how access to capital and credit scores impact business success, particularly for minority business owners. This evolves into a broader discussion about financial literacy education and whether schools should prioritize teaching practical money management skills.

Finally, they challenge the common perception among church members that academia is hostile to religious expression. Drawing from their personal experiences in higher education, Matt and Levi suggest that secular academic institutions are often more welcoming of diverse religious perspectives than commonly believed, potentially more so than religious institutions themselves.

Throughout the episode, the hosts maintain their characteristic blend of serious theological discussion, political commentary, and good-natured ribbing, demonstrating their different ideological perspectives while maintaining mutual respect.

Episode Topics:

• The concept of self-reliance in LDS doctrine and its potential misapplications
• Financial literacy, credit scores, and their impact on entrepreneurial success
• Religious expression in secular academic settings
• The Ukraine-US Mineral Agreement and its implications

Chapters

00:01 - Introduction and catching up

09:11 - Levi's controversial take on self-reliance as a doctrine

26:19 - Discussion of entrepreneurship, capital access, and credit scores

41:15 - The US-Ukraine Mineral Agreement and Trump's foreign policy

48:01 - Religious expression in secular academia

Send us a text

This week, hosts Shawn, Matt, and Marc delve into some thought-provoking questions ripped straight from the headlines!
Topic 1: The Weaponization of Misinformation
In a recent talk at Harvard, Pete Buttigieg painted a stark picture of misinformation, characterizing it as a weapon more devastating than nuclear arms in its ability to fracture American society. He highlighted Russia's strategy of simultaneously promoting contradictory messages to sow division rather than advocate for specific viewpoints. Buttigieg argued that technological advancements have paradoxically led to a state where we have "never had more information and we've never been less informed," as traditional evidence verification methods are undermined. If misinformation is indeed being weaponized by our adversaries, what are the most effective strategies to combat its spread and rebuild trust in reliable information?
Topic 2: DOGE: Efficiency or Favoritism?
Our resident DOGE enthusiast, Shawn, often champions the idea that the "Deep Office of Governmental Efficiency" (DOGE) is streamlining government and reducing fraud and waste. However, Pete Buttigieg offers a contrasting view arguing it's more about power consolidation than actual efficiency. He explains that rather than methodically evaluating program effectiveness or employee performance, DOGE simply fires people categorized as "probationary" without proper assessment. DOGE lacks the time or process for proper evaluation, making decisions based on White House favor rather than merit. In addition, a Senate report suggests that DOGE cuts could help Elon Musk companies avoid $2 billion in liabilities. DOGE doesn't really provide links to verify claims they make about how much money they have saved, but BBC news tried to figure out the savings from DOGE. Is DOGE truly focused on reducing fraud and waste, or is it primarily serving as a tool to consolidate power and potentially benefit influential figures like Elon Musk by helping his companies circumvent regulatory costs?
Topic 3: Trump's Presidential Profits
Trump may not be taking a salary, but he is getting richer from his service as president. Since taking office in January 2025, his $Trump meme coin cryptocurrency surged 70% after he promised exclusive presidential access for its largest investors at his golf club, with the tokens now valued at $2.5 billion. Meanwhile, his record-breaking $239 million inaugural fundraising drew unprecedented corporate donations seeking influence. Furthermore, he's issued executive orders establishing cryptocurrency regulations and reserves. These post-inauguration ventures represent concerning entanglements where presidential power is being directly converted into personal financial gain through the explicit pricing of access to the president himself. What would the founding fathers think about this kind of behavior?

Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Guest Welcome
02:05 Listener Engagement and Feedback
05:01 Discussion on Pete Buttigieg's Policies
09:03 Misinformation as a Weapon
18:22 Connecting to Combat Misinformation
19:14 Debate on Doge and Government Efficiency
24:36 Government Accountability and Transparency
29:58 The Role of Appointees in Government
34:02 Presidential Influence and Financial Gain
40:57 Divine Guidance and Mo

Send us a text

Join hosts Matt, Shawn, and Melanie for a deep dive into the week's most pressing and thought-provoking issues! In this episode, they tackle the controversial shifts in white-collar crime enforcement, including foreign bribery, public corruption, money laundering, and the impact of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Matt, Shawn, and Melanie debate the morality of prioritizing crimes with clear victims and whether all offenses deserve equal punishment. Plus, they analyze the latest Gallup poll on American taxpayers' sentiment regarding their federal income tax burden and question if historical tax rates should be revisited. Finally, the team dissects a Fox News survey assessing President Trump's first 100 days of his second term, covering his approval ratings on border security, inflation, and overall job performance. Their "Big Question" explores the ethical implications of wealth distribution upon death, inspired by Tony Hsieh's estate and his "wow" factor gifting plan. Tune in for insightful analysis and engaging debate with Matt, Shawn, and Melanie on these critical topics shaping our world.

Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Guest Introduction
01:59 Competitive Authoritarianism in the U.S.
08:00 Shifts in White Collar Crime Enforcement
15:53 Taxation and Morality in America
28:09 Government vs. Church in Helping the Poor
29:55 Trump's First 100 Days: Approval Ratings and Public Perception
41:10 Inheritance and Wealth Distribution: A Moral Dilemma

Send us a text

In this episode of Latter Day Lens, hosts Matt and Shawn delve into various topics including the contrasting deportation rates under Presidents Biden and Trump, the significance of the Pope's death, and the political dynamics involved in church leadership. They also discuss Utah's recent App Store Accountability Act aimed at protecting children online. The conversation highlights the complexities of immigration statistics, the role of the Pope in Christianity, and the balance between government regulation and free market principles. In this conversation, Matt and Shawn delve into the complexities of data privacy, the role of social media in shaping perceptions of wealth, and the ethical implications of gambling strategies. They discuss the challenges parents face in monitoring their children's online activities and the psychological effects of social media on self-worth, particularly the phenomenon of money dysphoria. The dialogue emphasizes the need for awareness and proactive measures in navigating the digital landscape.

Topic 2: Utah recently passed a law called The App Store Accountability Act. It would make app stores give apps real age ratings. It would also stop kids from making deals to buying or downloading apps without their parents' okay—like how things work in the real world. And it would let parents sue if apps lie and hurt their kids. IS this a good idea or government overreach?

Topic 3: Bernard Marantelli and his partners planned to buy almost every lottery ticket to win a huge jackpot in Texas. They usually use math and data, like Wall Street investors, to find good betting chances and win a lot of money each year. Their Texas lottery plan worked, and they won millions, but it made many people angry, with one politician calling it a huge "theft" from the state. They did not break any laws. Is this clever behavior that should be rewarded, or underhanded theft?

The Big Question: Seeing endless posts of fancy lifestyles on social media can create money dysphoria when the news talks about economic worries. It makes young people question how others afford such things, leading to feelings of inadequacy. One person in marketing notices many tempting online purchases while everyone else discusses financial hardship, highlighting this disconnect. This constant exposure to seemingly lavish lifestyles contributes to money dysphoria and can sometimes lead to impulsive spending followed by guilt as young people struggle to reconcile their own financial reality with curated online portrayals. The big Question, is money dysphoria some kind of mental disorder, or is it just a fancy word for the love of money, which is the root of all evil?

Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Listener Feedback
01:51 Deportation Rates: Biden vs. Trump
05:05 The Impact of the Pope's Death
09:49 Politics in Church Leadership
16:03 Utah's App Store Accountability Act
20:28 The Dilemma of Data Privacy
23:50 Parental Control in the Digital Age
26:36 Clever Gambling Strategies and Ethics
34:10 Money Dysphoria: The Impact of Social Media on Self-Worth

Send us a text

In this episode, Shawn, Matt, & Marc engage in a lively discussion covering various topics. They dive headfirst into the murky waters of corruption, questioning if all forms are equally damaging, sparked by AOC's critique of fellow Democrats and the broader issue of politicians profiting in office. The conversation then shifts to a chilling look at a Trump advisor's pre-election promise to make civil servants "miserable," examining ProPublica's prophetic reporting and its implications. The hosts also grapple with a disturbing case where the US government seemingly lost track of an individual the Supreme Court ordered to be returned to the country. Finally, they tackle a deeply profound and ethically complex situation arising from an IVF clinic's devastating embryo mix-up, forcing a re-evaluation of the very definition of parenthood.

The Thought Provoker:

Topic 1: Lots of people who are worried about corruption, insider trading, and oligarchy support politicians who get rich while they are in office. Shawn sometimes talks like they are all the same thing. Are they all equally bad?

Topic 2: In late October, ProPublica published one of its most prophetic stories in their history. They explained how a key Trump adviser said a Trump administration will seek to make civil servants miserable in their jobs. Before the election, many Trump voters dismissed this as hyperbole from the left. Do you agree that ProPublica was prophetic? Should we all pay more attention to their reporting?

Topic 3: The Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration had to help a man, wrongly deported to a dangerous El Salvador prison, return to the U.S. Despite the Supreme Court ordering his return, a U.S. government lawyercouldn't tell a judge where Kilmar Abrego Garcia was. The judge found it deeply concerning that the government didn't know the location of someone they were supposed to bring back. What should the Trump Administration do?

The Big Question: A shocking case in Australia raises a profound question about parenthood: after an IVF clinic mistakenly implanted the wrong embryo, a woman gave birth to a child genetically belonging to another couple. The discovery, made when the clinic found an extra embryo, leaves everyone involved in a deeply challenging situation. This unprecedented event forces us to consider: in such circumstances, who are the true parents of the child? Is parenthood defined by genetics, or by the experience of carrying and giving birth?

Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Listener Mailbag
03:03 Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Employment
06:08 Government Obligations and College Funding
09:00 Corruption and Insider Trading in Politics
12:01 Oligarchy vs. Democracy: A Political Debate
15:00 The Role of Wealth in Politics
18:01 Prophetic Reporting and Government Transparency
24:19 Navigating Employment Challenges in Government
30:10 The Role of Media in Government Accountability
38:24 Defining Parenthood: Genetics vs. Experience
48:30 Agency and Decision-Making in Complex Situations