The Income Standard cover art

The Income Standard

The Income Standard

By: Tod Long
Listen for free

About this listen

The Income Standard is where retirement income is designed, not guessed.

For decades, investors were told to accumulate assets, stay diversified, and trust the markets. But retirement isn’t about accumulation — it’s about distribution. And distribution requires engineering.

This podcast is for pre-retirees and retirees who want a measurable, structured approach to retirement income. Each episode breaks down the frameworks, math, risks, and decision architecture behind sustainable income planning.

No hype.
No fear tactics.
No product pushing.

Just disciplined thinking about how income should be built, tested, and held to a standard.

If you’ve built something over your lifetime, this show is about how to live on it — intelligently.

2026 Tod Long
Economics Personal Finance
Episodes
  • Why Your Retirement Number Is the Wrong Number
    Mar 2 2026

    Episode 2: Why Your Retirement Number Is the Wrong Number

    The Income Standard with Tod Long

    You've hit the number. Or you're close. The advisor ran the projections. The software says you're on track.

    So why does it still feel uncertain?

    Because the number answers the wrong question. "Do I have enough?" is an accumulation question. It measures a balance. What retirement actually demands is an income question: "How much of my monthly floor is guaranteed — regardless of what the market does the month I retire?"

    Those are different questions. And almost no one has been shown the second one.

    In Episode 2, Tod Long introduces the income floor — the most important number in retirement income architecture — and explains why the gap between your guaranteed income and your non-negotiable monthly expenses is the single measurement that determines whether your retirement is structurally sound or quietly fragile.

    This episode covers:

    The income floor defined — what it is, what counts as guaranteed income, and why Social Security alone almost never closes it.

    The false floor — why many people believe their floor is covered when it isn't, and the specific moment that assumption gets tested.

    David and Carol — a real planning scenario (names changed) with a $780,000 portfolio, $2,050/month in guaranteed income missing from their floor, and a solution that closes the gap without touching most of their savings.

    Why the 4% rule isn't a floor — the difference between a withdrawal rate that's statistically likely to survive and income that is contractually guaranteed to arrive.

    The cost of inaction — what David and Carol's retirement looks like if they go in with the gap open, year by year, including what a market correction in year two actually does to a portfolio that's carrying the floor.

    The Income Standard measurement — how every review starts with the floor gap, and why that number changes every other conversation that follows.

    If you've been measuring your retirement readiness by your balance and your projected withdrawal rate — this episode shows you what measurement you've been missing.

    Schedule The Income Standard Review at theincomestandard.com — no cost, no pitch, just measurement.

    Show More Show Less
    22 mins
  • The Retirement Trap Nobody Talks About
    Feb 23 2026

    Episode 1: The Retirement Trap Nobody Talks About The Income Standard with Tod Long

    Most people arrive at retirement having done everything right. The 401(k) was maxed. The portfolio was diversified. The number was hit.

    And then the questions start.

    How much can I actually spend? What if the market drops? What if I live to 92? What if my spouse outlives me by 15 years?

    In Episode 1, Tod Long explains why those questions feel so unsettling — and why the financial industry is structurally unprepared to answer them. The industry was built for one thing: accumulation. Helping people grow a balance. But growing a balance and engineering a reliable income stream are two completely different disciplines, governed by different rules, different risks, and different tools.

    This episode covers:

    The accumulation-to-distribution shift — what changes when you stop adding money and start drawing it down, and why most investors arrive at retirement still thinking in accumulation terms.

    Why the industry doesn't fix it — the structural incentives that keep advisors in growth mode, and the psychological conversations that most planning relationships avoid entirely.

    The four percent rule — what it is and what it isn't — a legitimate planning tool that answers one question while leaving four others unanswered.

    Michael vs. James — a side-by-side case study of two people with identical starting balances and completely different income architectures. Same market downturn. Completely different outcomes.

    The three objections — "My advisor says I'm fine." "I don't want to lock money up in an annuity." "I'll figure it out when I get there." Each one gets a direct answer.

    The Income Standard framework — what a written, stress-tested income architecture actually looks like, and how it differs from a withdrawal rate and a prayer.

    If you've never had a conversation that started with your guaranteed income floor and worked backward — this episode is that conversation.

    Schedule The Income Standard Review at theincomestandard.com — no cost, no pitch, just measurement.

    Show More Show Less
    22 mins
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.