As the 2026 World Cup approaches, how will geopolitics, migration policy and fan culture shape the tournament across the United States, Mexico and Canada? In this episode of FootPol, Guy Burton is joined by Pete Watson (University of Leeds) and Roger Magazine (Universidad Iberoamericana) to unpack the political fault lines running through the next World Cup, from US intervention in Venezuela and FIFA’s alignment with Donald Trump to visa regimes, immigration enforcement and security-heavy hosting models. Focusing on Latin American perspectives, the discussion explores rivalries, national memory, diaspora fandom and the risk that surveillance, ticket pricing and border controls could suppress the carnival atmosphere that defines World Cups. With Mexico navigating a secondary hosting role, US venues poised to dominate the later stages and Canada largely out of the spotlight, the episode asks whether 2026 will be remembered as a festival of football — or a case study in how power, politics and security reshape the world’s biggest sporting event.

In this episode of FootPol, Francesco Belcastro and Guy Burton are joined by CJ Price, Director of Football at Palmerston North Marist FC, for a deep dive into how football is evolving in New Zealand and across Oceania. Using Palmerston North Marist as a window onto the wider system, CJ unpacks life inside community-rooted clubs: how they are run, how leagues and youth pathways are structured and how the women’s game, futsal and volunteer-led governance fit together. With a restructured National League on the way, a men’s World Cup approaching and women’s football continuing to build after the 2023 World Cup, the conversation explores a game on the rise — becoming more organised and professional, while still negotiating the pull of local identity, accessibility, and community culture.

What really happened when the FA took over women’s football in 1993 – and why does it still matter today?

In this first episode of 2026, co-hosts Francesco Belcastro and Guy Burton are joined by Rafaelle Nicholson of Bournemouth Media School to unpack the hidden history, politics and governance of women’s football in England – from the rise and fall of the Women’s Football Association (WFA) to today’s debates over WSL independence and the recent introduction of NewCo governance.

Drawing on archival evidence and first-hand accounts, the conversation challenges the long-standing claim that the 1993 handover was a “merger.” Instead, it argues it was a takeover – one that dismantled a rare, gender-balanced governing body and replaced it with male-dominated FA structures, with lasting consequences for representation, accountability and grassroots autonomy.

The episode explores:

• How the WFA (1969–1993) built women’s football during and after FA hostility
• Why the FA takeover reduced women’s voice in governance, even as the game later grew
• Cross-sport parallels in women’s cricket, rugby, and hockey under 1990s “single governing body” policies
• What today’s WSL/Newco model could learn from both the Premier League breakaway and past governance failures
• Why women’s sport is still treated as a media apprenticeship, and how journalism education may be quietly changing that

With women’s football booming on the pitch but still contested off it, this episode asks a blunt question: growth for whom, and at what cost? And as the WSL edges towards greater autonomy, are we about to repeat history – or finally correct it?

Essential listening for anyone interested in women’s football, football governance, the FA, the WSL, sports politics and the future of the women’s game.

For those interested in reading the full article by Raf, it is available at the Sport in History website here.