Episodes

  • The Billionaires Playboy Club: A Memoir By Virginia Roberts (Chapter 19 Part 2 )(11/5/25)

    The Billionaires Playboy Club: A Memoir By Virginia Roberts (Chapter 19 Part 2 )(11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.


    In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud
    Show More Show Less
    12 mins
  • Alex Acosta, The DOJ And The Disgraceful Commitment To Defending The Epstein NPA (11/5/25)

    Alex Acosta, The DOJ And The Disgraceful Commitment To Defending The Epstein NPA (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    The Department of Justice’s continued defense of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement is a national disgrace, the clearest evidence yet that the system was never built to hold the powerful accountable. Alex Acosta, the U.S. Attorney who cut the deal, admitted under oath that he barely knew the facts of the case yet somehow decided it was a “50/50” call — all while relying on advice from Matthew Menchel, a man later revealed to be friendly with Epstein himself. Emails went missing, prosecutors who fought for the victims were ignored, and the entire case was quietly rerouted from Palm Beach to Washington, where the real fix was brokered behind closed doors. Golf course handshakes, backroom whispers, and D.C. connections did more to save Epstein than any courtroom argument ever could, and everyone involved knew exactly what they were doing.

    That infamous NPA wasn’t a mistake — it was a masterpiece of corruption, the only one of its kind in American legal history, granting immunity not just to Epstein but to everyone who may have trafficked or abused under his umbrella. And years later, the DOJ still has the nerve to say “no laws were broken,” as if that means anything when the law itself was twisted into a shield for the powerful. The Epstein deal wasn’t justice — it was the funeral of it. Every excuse, every shrug, every “it was complicated” from Acosta and his peers only confirms what’s been obvious since day one: the system didn’t fail by accident. It worked exactly as intended — to protect the rich, bury the truth, and leave the victims behind.


    to conact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
    Show More Show Less
    13 mins
  • Pomp, Perversion, and Poppers: The Ghislaine Maxwell Party at Sandringham (11/5/25)

    Pomp, Perversion, and Poppers: The Ghislaine Maxwell Party at Sandringham (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    Prince Andrew’s decision to host a party for Ghislaine Maxwell at Sandringham—where sex drugs like poppers were reportedly found—reads less like royal history and more like a bad dark comedy. The idea of a Queen’s residence being turned into something resembling a low-rent Sopranos episode is almost surreal. The whole scene feels like parody: the Duke of York, standing beneath portraits of British monarchs, presiding over a soirée that sounds like Downton Abbey crashing headfirst into Trainspotting. It’s especially grotesque given Epstein’s reputation for avoiding drugs himself—he didn’t need them, he used them on others. The thought of those same tools of control and exploitation making their way into a royal estate is equal parts absurd and revolting.

    What makes it worse is the total lack of accountability. The Palace still tries to frame these scandals as “private matters,” as though international sex trafficking and narcotics at royal residences can be brushed under the Windsor rug. Every new revelation cements Andrew as a man incapable of understanding—or even pretending to care about—the damage he’s done to the Crown’s image. Once considered a symbol of British decorum, Sandringham now sits as a monument to how far the monarchy has fallen, its history tainted by the stench of scandal and the arrogance of a prince who believed himself untouchable. In the end, Prince Andrew didn’t just disgrace himself—he made royal scandal feel like a recurring sketch in a show that refuses to end.



    to contact me:



    source:

    Sex drugs 'found at party' disgraced Andrew hosted for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in Sandringham, new Royal book claims | Daily Mail Online
    Show More Show Less
    16 mins
  • Donald Trump Is Terribly Sad About Disgraced Prince Andrew's Exile (11/5/25)

    Donald Trump Is Terribly Sad About Disgraced Prince Andrew's Exile (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    When asked about Prince Andrew’s exile from royal life and the Epstein scandal that forced King Charles to strip his brother of his military titles and patronages, Donald Trump struck a tone of sympathy — not for the victims, but for the Windsors. Speaking aboard Air Force One, Trump said, “I feel very badly. It’s a terrible thing that’s happened to the family. That’s been a tragic situation. It’s too bad. I mean, I feel badly for the family.” In classic Trump fashion, the comments came off as tone-deaf, framing the ordeal as a misfortune that befell the royals rather than a reckoning for Andrew’s own actions or associations. He offered no mention of Virginia Giuffre, the survivors, or the broader scandal surrounding Epstein’s network — only sorrow for the House of Windsor’s discomfort.


    The remarks were quickly criticized as another example of Trump’s tendency to sympathize with power over accountability. Rather than condemning Andrew’s behavior or the pattern of privilege that shielded him for years, Trump painted the royals as victims of circumstance — as if Andrew had simply stumbled into bad luck rather than disgrace of his own making. His comments echoed the same populist-elite paradox that defines his persona: railing against “the establishment” while showing deference to its crowned members when they fall. For many observers, the takeaway was clear — once again, Trump’s empathy seemed to extend only upward, toward the powerful, not toward the people whose lives were destroyed by Epstein and the system that protected him.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    Trump says he feels 'badly' for royal family over Andrew-Epstein scandal
    Show More Show Less
    14 mins
  • The Billionaires Playboy Club: A Memoir By Virginia Roberts (Chapter 18 Part 2 Chapter 19 Part 1 )(11/5/25)

    The Billionaires Playboy Club: A Memoir By Virginia Roberts (Chapter 18 Part 2 Chapter 19 Part 1 )(11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s unpublished memoir The Billionaire’s Playboy Club recounts her recruitment into Jeffrey Epstein’s world as a 16-year-old working at Mar-a-Lago, where she says Ghislaine Maxwell lured her in with promises of opportunity and travel. The manuscript describes how she became trapped in Epstein’s orbit, allegedly forced into sexual encounters with powerful men, including Prince Andrew, and ferried across his properties in New York, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. Giuffre paints a detailed picture of coercion, psychological manipulation, and the disturbing normalization of exploitation within Epstein’s high-society circle.


    In this episode, we begin our journey through that memoir.



    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    Virgina Giuffre Billionaire's Playboy Club | DocumentCloud
    Show More Show Less
    12 mins
  • The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Part 43-44) (11/5/25)

    The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Part 43-44) (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    The Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement (NPA) of 2007-08, reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), detailed how federal prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida negotiated a deal that effectively ended an active federal investigation into Epstein’s alleged trafficking and abuse of underage girls. The agreement granted broad immunity to Epstein and unnamed “potential co-conspirators,” allowed him to plead guilty to state charges instead of facing major federal sex-trafficking counts, and did so without informing or consulting the victims before the deal was executed. The OPR found that while no evidence of corruption or impermissible influence was uncovered, the decision represented “poor judgment” by the prosecutors.


    Further, the report underscored significant procedural deficiencies: victims were not made aware of the NPA, the USAO did not meaningfully engage with them in accordance with the Crime Victims’ Rights Act’s principles, and the immunity granted in the NPA curtailed future federal prosecution of Epstein’s associates—even as investigation into other victims and broader criminal conduct may have persisted. In short, the OPR concluded that the case resolution was legally within the prosecutors’ discretion, but deeply flawed in its execution and fairness to those harmed.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    dl (justice.gov)
    Show More Show Less
    24 mins
  • The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Part 41-42) (11/5/25)

    The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Part 41-42) (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    The Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement (NPA) of 2007-08, reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), detailed how federal prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida negotiated a deal that effectively ended an active federal investigation into Epstein’s alleged trafficking and abuse of underage girls. The agreement granted broad immunity to Epstein and unnamed “potential co-conspirators,” allowed him to plead guilty to state charges instead of facing major federal sex-trafficking counts, and did so without informing or consulting the victims before the deal was executed. The OPR found that while no evidence of corruption or impermissible influence was uncovered, the decision represented “poor judgment” by the prosecutors.


    Further, the report underscored significant procedural deficiencies: victims were not made aware of the NPA, the USAO did not meaningfully engage with them in accordance with the Crime Victims’ Rights Act’s principles, and the immunity granted in the NPA curtailed future federal prosecution of Epstein’s associates—even as investigation into other victims and broader criminal conduct may have persisted. In short, the OPR concluded that the case resolution was legally within the prosecutors’ discretion, but deeply flawed in its execution and fairness to those harmed.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    dl (justice.gov)
    Show More Show Less
    22 mins
  • The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Part 39-40) (11/5/25)

    The OIG Report Into Jeffrey Epstein's Non Prosecution Agreement (Part 39-40) (11/5/25)
    Nov 5 2025
    The Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement (NPA) of 2007-08, reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), detailed how federal prosecutors in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida negotiated a deal that effectively ended an active federal investigation into Epstein’s alleged trafficking and abuse of underage girls. The agreement granted broad immunity to Epstein and unnamed “potential co-conspirators,” allowed him to plead guilty to state charges instead of facing major federal sex-trafficking counts, and did so without informing or consulting the victims before the deal was executed. The OPR found that while no evidence of corruption or impermissible influence was uncovered, the decision represented “poor judgment” by the prosecutors.


    Further, the report underscored significant procedural deficiencies: victims were not made aware of the NPA, the USAO did not meaningfully engage with them in accordance with the Crime Victims’ Rights Act’s principles, and the immunity granted in the NPA curtailed future federal prosecution of Epstein’s associates—even as investigation into other victims and broader criminal conduct may have persisted. In short, the OPR concluded that the case resolution was legally within the prosecutors’ discretion, but deeply flawed in its execution and fairness to those harmed.


    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com


    source:

    dl (justice.gov)
    Show More Show Less
    32 mins