Episode #6 - Calculate Your AI Risk Score: The Complete Automation Immunity Test
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
By the end of this episode, you'll have a number—your personal automation risk score. Then we'll tell you exactly what to do about it.
Episode 6 of Surviving AI gives you the comprehensive assessment framework combining:
O*NET task analysis
The Four Protection Factors
Stanford exposure metrics
Microsoft AI applicability scores
THE 100-POINT ASSESSMENT:
SECTION 1: Task Analysis (40 points)
→ Routine vs. creative work
→ Digital vs. physical
→ Predictable vs. variable environment
→ Problem-solving requirements
→ High-stakes judgment
SECTION 2: Credential Barriers (30 points)
→ Licensing requirements
→ Preparation time
→ Continuing education
SECTION 3: Human Elements (20 points)
→ Empathy requirements
→ Non-verbal cue reading
SECTION 4: Liability & Authority (10 points)
→ Personal legal liability
SCORE INTERPRETATION:
81-100: VERY LOW RISK (protected through 2040+)
61-80: LOW RISK (protected through 2035)
41-60: MEDIUM RISK (transformation 2028-2032)
21-40: HIGH RISK (major impact 2025-2027)
0-20: CRITICAL RISK (displacement happening NOW)
SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS FOR EACH TIER:
→ Critical risk: Immediate transition required (6-12 month window)
→ High risk: Emergency career pivot (12-24 months)
→ Medium risk: Urgent upskilling needed
→ Low risk: Enhancement actions
→ Very low risk: Leverage AI to thrive
📊 Full assessment walkthrough included—pause and complete it as you listen.
Re-assess every 6 months. Your score isn't static.
#careertest #automationrisk #AIassessment #jobsecurity #careerplanning #futureproof
"Quick note before we dive in: This episode was created using AI tools, including Claude for research and scripting, Notebook LLM for voice generation, and Eleven Labs for intros. I'm demonstrating the very technology we're discussing - AI as a creative collaborator, not a replacement. Okay, let's get into it..."