In this episode, Dr. Laby dives into one of the most overlooked yet impactful factors in athletic performance: myopia, or nearsightedness. For athletes who depend on split-second visual precision—whether tracking a fastball, spotting a teammate, or reading subtle movement cues—nearsightedness can quietly erode competitive performance. The discussion begins by breaking down what myopia is: the ability to see near objects clearly but with blurred distance vision. While glasses and contacts can correct it temporarily, the real concern lies in progression—the gradual worsening of myopia over time.

The episode explores two critical consequences of progressive myopia. The first is the immediate impact on sports performance. Even small prescription changes can degrade visual acuity from elite levels like 20/12 or 20/15 down to 20/20, which for most people seems “perfect,” but for professional athletes can mean the difference between success and failure. The second consequence is more serious: long-term eye health. As the eye elongates, it physically stretches the retina, increasing the risk of irreversible damage such as retinal tears, detachment, maculopathy, and early cataracts.

Listeners then learn how managing myopia isn’t just about sharper sight—it’s about protecting the structure and longevity of the eye itself. Research shows that slowing myopia progression by just one diopter (one unit in prescription strength) can reduce future vision-threatening risks by approximately 40%. That’s a profound, quantifiable benefit that highlights the importance of early intervention, especially for young athletes and those still developing visually through their teens and early twenties.

Dr. Laby also outlines the key risk factors that increase susceptibility to progressive myopia: early age of onset, genetics, excessive near work (especially screen time), and ethnic background (with higher prevalence in individuals of Asian descent). These insights are paired with actionable recommendations, including regular, specialized sports vision evaluations that go beyond the standard “20/20” eye exam.

Finally, the episode introduces three modern, evidence-based strategies proven to slow or control myopia progression: orthokeratology (Ortho-K)—nighttime lenses that reshape the cornea; multifocal soft contact lenses that alter peripheral focus; and low-dose atropine eye drops, which biochemically signal the eye to slow elongation. Together, these tools empower athletes and parents alike to make informed, proactive decisions about visual health—ensuring not just peak performance today, but lifelong visual stability and safety.

• Myopia (nearsightedness) affects both athletic performance and long-term eye health.
• Even a slight increase in prescription (e.g., 0.50–1.00 diopter) can lower visual performance from elite to average levels.
• Progressive myopia causes the eye to elongate, increasing risks of retinal damage, maculopathy, and cataracts.
• Slowing myopia by just 1 diopter reduces future vision risks by roughly 40%.
• Major risk factors: young age of onset, genetics, prolonged near work, and Asian ethnicity.
• Three proven treatments for controlling progression:

1. Orthokeratology (Ortho-K): Nighttime corneal reshaping lenses.
2. Multifocal soft contacts: Adjust peripheral light focus to limit eye growth.
3. Low-dose atropine drops: Biochemical signal that halts elongation.

• Regular sports vision evaluations are crucial — 20/20 isn’t necessarily “good enough” for elite performance.
• The goal: Correct for...

What can a TV comedy teach us about world-class performance? In this episode, we explore how a single dart scene from Ted Lasso reveals two powerful lessons for athletes and high performers everywhere: a mental framework to stay cool under pressure, and a visual technique used by the best in the world.

Drawing on decades of experience from Dr. Daniel Laby — a specialist who’s worked with elite athletes across MLB, Olympic sports, and more — we break down how mindset + visual precision can give anyone an edge.

You’ll discover why the phrase “Be curious, not judgmental” is more than a clever line, and how the science of the Quiet Eye separates pros from amateurs in darts, golf, basketball, and beyond.

• Curiosity over judgment: Why shifting your mindset transforms pressure into opportunity.
• The cost of judgment: How negative self-talk triggers physiological stress that kills performance.
• The Quiet Eye: A science-backed visual technique that stabilizes focus and improves accuracy.
• Three performance tools: Verbal cues, micro-target precision, and optimal timing.
• Real-world application: How athletes can train these skills and how you can apply them in any domain.

0:00 – 0:45 | Introduction — performance lessons from Ted Lasso’s dart scene

0:46 – 2:05 | Two key lessons: mindset & technique

2:06 – 3:20 | Why judgment kills performance (physiology of fight-or-flight)

3:21 – 4:35 | Curiosity as a diagnostic tool — from golf to team dynamics

4:36 – 5:45 | Transition: Mindset → Technique (introducing the Quiet Eye)

5:46 – 7:05 | Dr. Joan Vickers’ research — what defines the Quiet Eye

7:06 – 8:15 | Ted’s 3 performance tools: verbal cue, precision vision, timing

8:16 – 9:20 | Science-backed evidence: why elites hit more accurately

9:21 – 9:49 | Wrap-up: Mindset + Technique together, final takeaway

Transcript 

Now if you're looking for that edge in performance science, well sometimes you find it in really unexpected places. Today we're actually digging into elite performance, but maybe not from the source you'd expect. We're looking at insights from, believe it or not, a scene in Ted Lasso that dart scene.

Right, exactly. That dart scene. We're combining that with, uh, decades of professional experience to pull out. Two key lessons, one mental, one physical things you can use pretty much instantly to improve focus, whether that's in sports or really any skill that demands it. Yeah, it sounds fun pulling from a TV show, but the foundation here is really solid.

We're leaning heavily on insights from specialists, particularly Dr. Daniel Laby. I mean, this is someone with 30 years. 30 years working hands-on with top tier professional athletes across all kinds of sports. Wow. 30 years. Yeah. So the goal here is basically to take what the absolute best performers learn and, you know, bring it straight to you.

Perfect. Okay, so let's set up that lasso scene just quickly. Season one, Ted's playing darts against Rupert, the antagonist. He's way behind, needs three perfect throws, huge pressure. And the sources we look at, they argue he wins not by luck, but through well real technique in psychology. Mm-hmm. It's a great illustration.

So let's start with a mind game. Ted drops that famous line right before his comeback. Be curious, not judgmental. Okay, great quote. But how does that actually work for winning under pressure? Well, it's more than just a nice phrase, whether Walt Whitman actually said it or not. That's kind of...

In this episode, we explore one of the most fundamental yet misunderstood aspects of human performance: reaction time. We often assume catching a falling object or responding instantly in sport is purely reflexive—but the truth is far more nuanced. Dr. Daniel Laby, with over 30 years of experience working with elite athletes, helps us unpack what reaction time really is, how it’s measured, and what surprising factors influence it.

We begin by breaking down simple reaction time—the fastest see–process–react loop. Unlike complex in-game decisions, simple reaction time involves a preplanned response to a visual cue. While not a mindless reflex, it’s the shortest possible cognitive pathway, critical for everything from driving to high-level sports performance.

The discussion then shifts to how we measure such a fleeting process. From Francis Galton’s 19th-century ruler drop test to modern computerized systems, each method has strengths and flaws. Even today’s tech introduces delays from sensors, software, and display refresh rates, meaning that raw scores often don’t reflect true human biology. Carefully controlled research suggests the most accurate average simple reaction time is about 210 milliseconds.

Dr. Laby’s work also uncovers key influences on reaction speed. Age clearly matters—reaction time slows by about 55 milliseconds per decade—but sex and race show no significant differences. Most surprising is the discovery of a spatial advantage: people may react faster when a stimulus appears on the opposite side of their reacting hand, likely due to how the brain processes cross-hemisphere information.

These insights have implications well beyond sports. From designing safer dashboards and alert systems to tailoring athletic training, understanding the nuances of reaction time could make a measurable difference in both everyday safety and elite performance.

• Simple Reaction Time Defined: A rapid see–process–react loop involving a preplanned response.
• Measuring Challenges: Traditional ruler tests are simple but imprecise; even computers introduce lag.
• Benchmark Speed: True human reaction time is ~210 ms once system delays are accounted for.
• Impact of Age: Reaction time slows about 55 ms per decade, influencing both athletes and daily activities.
• No Sex or Race Effect: Research shows no significant differences in simple reaction time between groups.
• Spatial Advantage: Faster responses can occur when stimuli appear opposite the reacting hand’s side.
• Applications: Insights can optimize training, sports strategies, and even safety systems like driving or emergency alerts.

• 00:00 – 01:10 | Introduction: Why reflexes aren’t as simple as they seem
• 01:10 – 03:00 | Defining simple reaction time: the see–process–react loop
• 03:00 – 04:30 | Measuring reaction time: ruler drop test & early science
• 04:30 – 06:30 | Modern computer tests: hidden delays and biases
• 06:30 – 08:00 | The true benchmark: ~210 milliseconds
• 08:00 – 09:30 | Age and reaction time: slowing by ~55 ms per decade
• 09:30 – 10:45 | Myths debunked: no sex or race differences
• 10:45 – 11:45 | Spatial advantage: faster when reacting across sides
• 11:45 – 12:33 | Implications for sports, safety, and everyday life

 We often just take our reflexes for granted. Don't we like catching something, falling off a table? Absolutely. Split-second stuff....