Hundreds of public figures — from Steve Wozniak to Prince Harry — just signed a petition demanding a global ban on AI superintelligence. Their fear? That super-AI could outthink us, escape our control, and maybe even spell the end of humanity.

I get it. The Skynet comparisons. The doomsday bunkers. The "pause everything until it's safe" approach. On the surface, it sounds reasonable.

But here's the hard truth: If we don't build it, someone else will — and you better pray they believe in freedom.

00:00 - Intro: "Prince Harry wants to ban superintelligent AI?"
02:30 - What the open letter actually says
05:00 - The real fears behind the ban movement
07:15 - Why bans might backfire (China, anyone?)
09:20 - Historical analogies: cars, nukes, and Pandora's box
11:30 - Who benefits from slowing AI down?
13:45 - Regulation vs. prohibition — the real solution
16:00 - The only thing scarier than ASI? Letting someone else build it first.

In this episode, I break down:

• 🚨 Why people are calling for a ban on superintelligent AI

• 🤝 The fears we should absolutely empathize with

• 💣 Why banning it could actually make the threat worse

• 🧠 How we can build ASI safely — but only if we lead

• 👀 Why some folks shouting "pause" might just be trying to protect their power

I don't side with blind acceleration. But I don't buy moral panic either. There's a middle path — innovate with oversight, lead with principles, and don't cede the future to authoritarian AI.

This one's unfiltered, unsponsored, and unapologetic. Let's go.

Contact Mark: @markfidelman on X