In this episode of ReformCast, Rob Anderson delivers a wide-ranging update on major accountability issues unfolding across Clark County and Southwest Washington — from county politics to public libraries to a deeply troubling school district case.

Rob begins with a brief update on the Clark County Council’s proposed anti-ICE resolution. After a heated and chaotic public meeting earlier in the year, the first week of February brought an unusual calm, with no draft resolution appearing on the agenda. Rob predicts this silence is temporary and argues that any eventual resolution is likely to disappoint far-left activists who pushed for language more extreme than Vancouver’s. He questions whether elected officials are crossing their proper role by engaging in inflammatory rhetoric rather than staying within their legislative lane.

The episode then revisits the Fort Vancouver Regional Library Board, where a trustee resigned after the board rejected DEI-heavy language in its strategic plan. Rob explains why he believes the situation is far from over, warning that the Clark County Council may attempt to interfere with the board’s decision — a pattern he says mirrors past efforts to reshape outcomes when votes don’t align with council preferences.

The bulk of the episode focuses on a months-long investigation into the Ridgefield School District. Rob details how students repeatedly filed complaints against a cheer coach for abusive behavior, only to be ignored while the district publicly celebrated the coach and nominated her for Coach of the Year. It was only after parents and Rob filed public records requests that the district abruptly acted, forcing the coach’s resignation rather than holding her publicly accountable.

What followed, Rob explains, was even more alarming: the Ridgefield School District released public records containing unredacted names and student IDs of multiple minors who had filed complaints. Despite being warned, the district released a second “corrected” batch that exposed even more student information, then falsely downplayed the scope of the breach before later admitting the extent of the error. Rob argues this represents a systemic failure of the district’s most basic responsibility — protecting students.

The episode closes with a stark warning about institutional accountability, transparency, and the real-world consequences when public agencies prioritize reputation management over the people they are meant to serve.

In this episode of ReformCast, Rob Anderson breaks down a series of tense — and telling — public meetings in Clark County that signal rising political pressure, organized activism, and high-stakes institutional battles.

Rob opens with what he describes as a watershed County Council meeting, packed wall-to-wall with organized activists pushing for an expanded anti-ICE resolution. Unlike typical, sparsely attended council meetings, this one was volatile and intimidating, marked by heckling, coordinated talking points, and repeated attempts by Councilor Sue Marshall to control the crowd. Rob examines how groups like Indivisible Greater Vancouver and Portland-based anti-ICE organizations mobilized supporters, distributed scripts, and demanded the county go further than Vancouver’s recent resolution — potentially denouncing not just ICE and DHS, but the FBI and other law enforcement agencies as well.

Rob shares his own public testimony, warning that inflammatory resolutions and rhetoric can escalate real-world conflict, undermine public safety, and encourage interference with lawful police operations — concerns underscored by Vancouver Police Chief Troy Price’s recent public plea for residents to stop interfering with high-risk arrests.

The episode then shifts to another “frosty” meeting: the Fort Vancouver Regional Library Board of Trustees. After years of strategic planning guided by outside consultants, the board rejected DEI-driven language around “equity,” “equitable access,” and “informational freedom,” opting instead for a mission centered on literacy, learning, and civic life. In response, Trustee Mary Williams resigned on the spot — highlighting the ideological rigidity surrounding DEI language and the pressure facing local institutions that resist it.

Finally, Rob offers an update on the Charter Review Commission, where conservatives now hold a narrow majority for the first time. He explains why early fights over bylaws, transparency, and leadership matter deeply, as the commission’s work could shape ballot measures and county governance for decades to come.

Rob closes by urging listeners to stay engaged, informed, and prepared — noting that these meetings are not isolated events, but signs of broader political movements actively organizing in Clark County.

In this episode of ReformCast, Rob Anderson examines proposed changes to Clark County Council’s rules and procedures that raise serious questions about transparency, power, and political retaliation.

Rob breaks down why the council suddenly wants to formalize “removal powers” that would allow councilors to be stripped of committee assignments—coming on the heels of last year’s controversial removal of Councilor Belkot over the light rail vote and ongoing litigation tied to that decision. He questions why, if the county claims its actions were already legal, these powers are now being written into the rules.

The episode also revisits last year’s fight over invocation, prayer, and the Pledge of Allegiance, as councilors quietly propose moving them outside the formal meeting—an incremental shift that could signal future removal altogether.

During public comment, Rob urges the council to adopt a rule requiring cooperation with law enforcement investigations related to county business. Councilor Sue Marshall responds defensively, claiming no one refused to cooperate—prompting Rob to walk listeners through the documented timeline of delays and non-responses detailed in the Skamania County investigation.

Finally, Rob highlights growing anti-ICE sentiment in Clark County, including an upcoming resolution scheduled for discussion, following similar moves by the City of Vancouver and state officials.

As always, ReformCast keeps a close watch on county government actions that impact accountability, public trust, and the rule of law.

In this episode of ReformCast, Rob Anderson breaks down a series of troubling developments from Clark County Council that signal 2026 is starting exactly like years past—higher taxes, rushed decisions, political flip-flops, and deeply concerning priorities.

Rob unpacks how a new “affordable housing” sales tax appeared suddenly in January with no clear plan, no identified project, and no accountability—just weeks after the county approved historic tax increases. He reveals the real reason behind the urgency: county funds were drained to support Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle’s bridge shelter project, leaving officials scrambling to refill the coffers.

The episode also covers unsettling discussions around ICE and jail services, including questions raised about whether county resources should be used to help people avoid federal immigration enforcement.

Rob then highlights a disturbing moment during council discussion on proposed legislation to close loopholes in sex offender reporting—legislation prompted by a local youth football scandal. While the proposal seems like common sense to protect children, Councilor Sue Marshall raises concerns not about victims, but about the offenders’ employment and housing outcomes.

Finally, Rob addresses disappointing news about Clark County’s 250th anniversary celebrations, confirming that fireworks will not return to Fort Vancouver despite public interest and nostalgia.

As always, ReformCast keeps a close eye on county government to ensure transparency, accountability, and policies that truly serve the people.

ReformCast, a new video podcast from Rob Anderson, founder of Reform Clark County, the largest watchdog group in Clark County seeking reforms to return the agencies back to the People, finally launches its first episode that sits down with Councilor Michelle Belkot. In this episode, we look back at 2025 and ahead to 2026, which also includes if Belkot intends to run for reelection.