Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review - Parts 1-4 #PeerRevWk17
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Perspectives on Transparency in Peer Review - Parts 1-4 #PeerRevWk17
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
Summary
Parts 1-4 of our Transparency in Peer Review discussion with Tom Lang (Tom Lang Communications and Training International), Allison Leung (PLOS), David Resnik, JD, PhD (NIEHS), and Pedro Ramirez, MD (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). In this installment we take a closer look at
1. What transparency means 2. How transparency benefits the researcher 3. How transparency benefits the public 4. How transparency addresses the limitations of traditional peer review
Music: www.bensound.com
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_c
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.