In this episode, hosts Adrienne Barker and Joseph Lobosco dive into Murder in Mississippi: Sheldon “Timothy” Herrington & Ole Miss Student Jimmie “Jay” Lee — the July 2022 disappearance and murder of University of Mississippi (Ole Miss) student Jimmie “Jay” Lee, and the winding path from a missing-person report to a capital murder case, a mistrial, and a shocking guilty plea. From digital evidence and surveillance footage to the controversial bond decision, this Oxford, Mississippi true crime story raises big questions about motive, secrecy, and whether you can — or should — convict someone of murder without a body.

Tune in to hear:

July 8, 2022 – Disappearance of Ole Miss student Jimmie “Jay” Lee: In the early morning hours, 20-year-old Jay leaves his Oxford apartment around dawn and never returns. When he can’t be reached and misses plans later that day, concern escalates. Police initially treat it as a missing-person case — but not for long.

Early investigation – Focus shifts to Sheldon “Timothy” Herrington Jr: Detectives identify Sheldon Timothy Herrington Jr., a 22-year-old Ole Miss graduate, as a key contact connected to Jay’s last known communications and movements. Prosecutors later argue Jay went to Herrington’s apartment that morning — and never left alive.

Chilling digital evidence – The strangulation search: Investigators claim Herrington searched “how long does it take to strangle someone?” shortly before the meetup window, and the state later frames that search as intent and premeditation.

Days later – Jay’s car found abandoned: Jay’s Ford Fusion is discovered at the Molly Barr Trails apartment complex in Oxford. His belongings are still inside, but Jay is missing — a detail investigators interpret as consistent with foul play, not a voluntary disappearance.

Surveillance timeline – The staging theory: Investigators say video captures Herrington near where Jay’s car was left, leaving on foot, and later getting a ride. Prosecutors describe the abandoned vehicle as staging — dumping the car to create confusion and buy time.

Walmart purchase – Duct tape on the morning Jay vanished:Investigators say Herrington bought duct tape that morning, a purchase the prosecution treats as potentially significant when paired with the larger concealment narrative.

Movements and concealment – “This wasn’t yard work”:Prosecutors argue Herrington’s later movements — including travel toward Grenada and items like a shovel and wheelbarrow, plus use of a box truck tied to a moving business — align with a body disposal theory.

Two weeks later – Arrest in a no-body homicide case: Herrington is arrested and charged despite no recovered body and no medically confirmed cause of death. Prosecutors argue the digital trail, surveillance, and behavior prove Jay is dead and Herrington killed him.

Bond controversy – Risk vs. rights: A judge initially denies bond, but Herrington is later released under conditions — sparking outrage and debate because Jay is still missing, while others argue due process and “innocent until proven guilty” still applies.

Capital murder indictment – The high-risk “no-body” prosecution: Herrington is indicted for capital murder. Prosecutors prepare to prove murder without a body; the defense leans hard on the lack of a body, lack of cause of death, and lack of direct forensic evidence. Late 2024 – First trial ends in mistrial: Prosecutors emphasize the digital evidence, timing, surveillance, the duct tape purchase, the abandoned car, and concealment theories. The defense attacks assumptions and the absence of a body or definitive