Molly, our host, talks with Kylee MacLeod, Juris Doctor Candidate 2026, about her article about the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court's ruling in Good v. Uber.

In this episode, Kylee talks about how everyday people, like William Good, may inadvertently lose access to justice due to complex terms and conditions, raising concerns about transparency and consumer rights in digital contracts.

The full article is available to read in the New England Law Review Website

https://newenglrev.com/2026/01/13/when-good-loses-how-the-arbitration-clause-in-good-v-uber-opens-a-trapdoor-for-corporate-sleight-of-hand-in-the-digital-age/

Molly, our host, sits down with Kate McQuaide, Juris Doctor Candidate 2026, to explore the issues surrounding Section 230, also known as "the 23 words that created the internet."

In this episode, Kate talks about her article titled "A Law Fostering Innovation or Big Tech Manipulation?: The Unduly Broad Immunity Granted by Section 230 and its Harmful Effects on Quiet Voices." She analyzes the reason for the law's original construction, the parties that benefit most under the existing system, and provides an alternative moving forward.

The full article will be available to read in the New England Law Review Vol. 60-1.

CW: Discussions of violence and sexual violence, transphobia, homophobia

Damien sits down with Agripino Kennedy, Juris Doctorate Candidate 2025, to talk about anti-transgender legislation in the United States, Language, Eugenics, Biological Essentialism, and how to challenge your worldview. In this episode, Agripino talks about their article "Looking At Anti-Transgender Laws Through Post-Structuralism: The Threat of Eugenics And Biological Essentialism," which explores the language we use in the law, the ways that language can be harmful, and how we can better advocate for transgender rights.