Karen Read 1-1: Richard Green Affidavit
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
A single Google search. A disputed timestamp. And a murder trial that ended in a mistrial.
In the high-profile Karen Read case, competing digital forensics experts offered contradictory testimony about when a key witness searched “hos long to die in cold” on an iPhone. But let’s take a step back and first review the affidavit that started it all.
This session breaks down defense expert Richard Green’s affidavit that challenged the prosecution’s narrative and ultimately won Karen Read access to additional evidence. We’ll discuss the specific artifacts Green analyzed, why context matters, and how no digital evidence artifact stands alone.
This is Episode 1 of our deep dive into the 2024 Karen Read trial.
Digital Forensics Tool mentioned:
- Magnet Axiom
- Cellebrite
Digital Forensics Artifacts mentioned:
- KnowledgeC.db
- callhistory.storedata
- com.apple.mobilesafari.plist
- browser state.db
Key Terms:
- Hos long to die in cold
- How long ti die in cikd
Links:
- Richard Green Affidavit
- https://assets.super.so/669329c3-e11b-4cc8-9a05-1c7f310ff348/files/80f46306-87ad-41c2-a85a-138a816e44b6/Affidavit_of_Richard_Green_in_Support_of_Defendants_Motion_for_Order_Pursuant_to_MASS._R._CRIM._P._17_Directed_to_Brian_Albert_Verizon_and_ATT.pdf
- Defense Motion
- https://elderlaw.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/sj-2023-0343-petition.pdf