Is it a bad idea to trade in either traditional stocks, or cryptocurrencies, during wars? #infopods cover art

Is it a bad idea to trade in either traditional stocks, or cryptocurrencies, during wars? #infopods

Is it a bad idea to trade in either traditional stocks, or cryptocurrencies, during wars? #infopods

Listen for free

View show details

About this listen

 Is it a bad idea to trade in either traditional stocks, or cryptocurrencies, during wars? Short answer.
It is not automatically a bad idea —
but it is a different game. And many people lose money because they trade
as if nothing has changed. Here is a clear, war-aware way to think about
stocks versus crypto during wars —
without hype, and without doom. The core rule — before anything else. Wars do not kill markets.
Uncertainty does. Markets can rise during wars.
But they punish
short-term speculation,
leverage,
emotional trading,
and so-called “sure thing” narratives. Traditional stocks during wars. When trading stocks is risky. In the early stages of war —
the first weeks or months —
volatility is extreme. News reversals whipsaw prices.
Algorithms dominate market movement. If you need the money soon,
forced selling during dips
locks in losses. And if you chase defence or oil hype late,
by the time it feels obvious,
it is often already priced in. When stocks can still work. Long-term investing —
five to ten years, or more. Historically, even Second World War-era markets
recovered, and grew,
after initial shocks. Broad, boring exposure tends to hold up better. Index funds.
Utilities.
Healthcare.
Consumer staples. These survive wars
better than so-called “story stocks.” What usually does badly. Small, speculative technology companies.
Luxury goods.
Highly indebted businesses. And anything dependent on
cheap energy,
or fragile supply chains. Crypto during wars. Crypto is not a safe haven
in the way gold once was. Why crypto is dangerous in wartime. It behaves like high-risk technology —
not like money. Liquidity dries up quickly.
Large holders and exchanges
dominate price action. And regulatory threats
increase during crises. In most modern conflicts, crypto has
fallen with stocks,
not against them —
and crashed harder
during fear spikes. When crypto can make sense. Only as a very small allocation —
think of it as an asymmetric bet. Only if you already understand cycles deeply. And only as a hedge
against long-term currency debasement —
not short-term war news. Because trading crypto actively during wars
is closer to professional gambling
than to investing. The biggest trap — thinking war equals opportunity. Many people lose money because they believe: “War means defence stocks go up.”
“Oil will definitely rise.”
“Crypto will replace collapsing currencies.” Professionals were already positioned
before the headlines broke. Retail traders usually arrive
after volatility peaks. A safer wartime hierarchy.
This is not advice — just a pattern. First, a cash buffer.
Liquidity equals power. Second, low-debt, essential businesses. Third, broad index exposure. Fourth, a small speculative slice — optional. And last, high-frequency trading.
This is the worst choice in war. The psychological risk — the hidden killer. Wars increase
doom-scrolling,
over-trading,
confirmation bias,
and sleep-deprived decision-making. This alone destroys more portfolios
than oil prices ever will. Bottom line. Short-term trading during wars —
high risk for most people. Long-term investing —
historically survivable. Crypto trading —
only for experts,
and only in small amounts. Cash, and patience,
are often the strongest wartime position.

🎙️
#infopods — calm, factual briefings for complex times Politica UK Podcast
Independent analysis, non-fiction readings, and short-form explainers on geopolitics, economics, conflict, and social change. Featuring selected audiobook excerpts from the Tale

Teller Club Press catalogue. Authored and edited by
📚 Sarnia de la Maré FRSA

💬 Companion blog: https://politica-uk.blogspot.com/
🕊️ Daily insights on X: @taletellerclub © 2026 Tale Teller Club Press · All rights reserved.
Views expressed are editorial and educational in nature.

DISCLAIMER Politica UK publishes informational audio briefings and editorial commentary intended to provide context and understanding of political, economic, and social developments. Content is produced for educational and informational purposes only.

It does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. Any references to public figures, institutions, or events are made in good faith, based on publicly available information, and presented for contextual analysis rather than persuasion.
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.