New York’s ballot may be “minor” on the calendar, but the ideas on it are anything but. We dive straight into the clash between headline promises and hard arithmetic: free buses and subways pitched as safety and access, a new 2% levy on high earners to pay for it, and a sweeping push for stricter rent control alongside massive “affordable” housing builds. It all sounds generous until you trace where the money comes from and how behavior changes when the bill lands on a small slice of taxpayers.

We pull apart the numbers behind fare-free transit, the city’s existing deficit, and the proposed tax mechanics that go beyond simply nudging incomes. Then we test the rent control narrative against decades of evidence from economists like Thomas Sowell and Henry Hazlitt: cap prices while costs climb and you get deferred maintenance, vacant units in regulated buildings, and a dwindling supply for the very people you want to help. Promises to abolish private property raise the stakes further, because property rights are the engine of financing, upgrades, and new construction. Remove those signals, and you don’t get equity; you get scarcity.

To highlight the pattern, we shift to healthcare and follow how ACA premiums rose while subsidies grew to mask the pain, funneling public dollars toward private insurers and leaving the unsubsidized middle squeezed. Across transit, housing, and health, the through line is clear: compassion without math collapses under its own weight, while targeted, tested policies that expand supply and protect the vulnerable can actually stick. If you care about safe streets, reliable transit, livable homes, and budgets that balance, this conversation cuts through the spin and goes straight to tradeoffs.

If this resonates, follow the show, share it with a friend who loves New York, and leave a review with the one policy you’d fund first and why. Your take might shape our next deep dive.

Support the show

Start with a sharp laugh and end with a sharper pencil—that’s the ride. We open on the “No Kings” protests and ask the one question that keeps getting dodged: what exactly makes a leader a “king,” and where’s the proof? The more we push for a concrete example, the more the answers dissolve into vibes. That gap matters, because movements that can’t define their claims can’t measure their wins, and policy built on fog tends to become expensive fast.

From there, we move into the meat: pandemic-era health subsidies that were sold as temporary relief and the renewed push to make them permanent. We walk through how enhanced ACA tax credits ripple through budgets, what it means for deficits, and how emergency rooms became choke points under overlapping pressures. The debate isn’t compassion versus cruelty—it’s compassion plus math. Someone pays, either now through taxes or later through inflation, service cuts, or interest.

New York becomes the case study. “Free” buses priced at hundreds of millions a year sound great until you stack them against an already strained budget and a mobile tax base. Add proposals to tax high earners and businesses, and you can almost hear the migration engine warming up. We unpack how costs shift to consumers, how growth stalls when capital flees, and why durable equity depends on productivity, clean procurement, and predictable rules—not just catchy promises.

To keep it human, we swerve into a wildly uneven movie night with Primitive War. It starts strong, collapses into “killer ostrich dinosaur” territory, then sprints to a glossy finale. That arc becomes a metaphor for governance: the trailer isn’t the policy, the middle act is where execution wins or fails. And because curiosity should trump cynicism, we close with USO sightings—footage, claims, and the old Orson Welles panic echoing into today’s oceans. We don’t hand you certainty; we hand you a better set of questions.

If you’re tired of slogans and hungry for specifics—with a few hard laughs along the way—hit play, share with a friend, and tell us where you stand. Subscribe, leave a quick review, and drop your sharpest counterpoint; we’ll read the best ones on the show.

#Aliens #heathcare #Satire

Support the show

Ever hear a crowd chant against a problem that doesn’t exist? We wade into a “No Kings Day” rally where the signs are loud, the claims are louder, and the facts are on mute. From monarchy talk in a republic to fast-and-loose definitions of fascism, we press on specifics, test assumptions, and map the rhetorical detours people take when passion outruns proof. It’s not just about scoring points; it’s about showing how questions, timelines, and definitions turn noise into something you can think with.

Then we flip the flashlight toward Gen X Halloween legends, the ones parents used to whisper at the door. Turns out a few weren’t just late-night scares. Poisoned candy? A 1974 cyanide murder warped an entire October. The babysitter with the calls coming from inside the house? A 1950 case echoes through the trope. Real corpses as props on set, Detroit’s Devil’s Night fires lighting up the sky, and a Teddy Ruxpin that kept talking after the batteries were pulled—each story proves how a single hard fact can seed decades of folklore.

Across protests and ghost stories, the theme is the same: stories guide behavior, for better and worse. Outrage can organize. Myths can protect. But both go wrong when they drift from evidence. We keep the tone sharp, the questions pointed, and the payoffs real, so you walk away with a clearer lens—on politics that confuse and legends that still haunt. If you’re ready for a wild swing from street interviews to spooky receipts, hit play and bring your curiosity.

If this resonated, follow the show, share it with a friend, and drop a review with your favorite Gen X legend or your spiciest protest sign. Your take might make the next episode.

Support the show