In this episode, we walk through the abrupt and stunning end of the Georgia election interference case — the prosecution that many legal experts once saw as the strongest and most durable criminal threat to President Trump over 2020.

The hosts start with Judge Scott McAfee’s brief but decisive order on November 26, 2025, dismissing the entire Georgia RICO case against Trump and his remaining co-defendants. From there, they rewind to the sweeping 2023 indictment, the use of Georgia’s racketeering law, the infamous Raffensperger “find 11,780 votes” call, the fake electors scheme, and the Coffey County voting machine breach. They unpack why prosecutors tried to frame all of this as a single “criminal enterprise” — and why that strategy was always controversial.

Then the episode shifts into the procedural unraveling: the romantic relationship between DA Fani Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade, the bruising disqualification fight, and the Court of Appeals’ ruling that the “appearance of impropriety” alone was enough to remove Willis and her entire office. When no one else in Georgia wanted to inherit the case, Pete Skandalakis stepped in, only to conclude that the whole prosecution rested on the wrong legal theory — that what happened was fundamentally a federal matter, not a state RICO enterprise.

From there, the hosts zoom out to the national picture. They connect Georgia’s collapse to the earlier demise of Jack Smith’s federal cases after Trump’s reelection and to the unusual outcome of the New York hush money conviction, where a 34-count felony verdict resulted in an unconditional discharge and no actual punishment. Taken together, they argue, these episodes expose just how difficult it is for the legal system to hold a sitting president or president-elect criminally accountable.

Finally, the conversation turns to what comes next in Georgia. With the criminal cases over, Republican lawmakers are now pushing aggressive changes to the state’s election rules ahead of the 2026 midterms — from rolling back mail-in voting and ballot drop boxes to proposals for hand-marked paper ballots, handwritten voter lists, and even paid incentives for mass voter challenges. The hosts also examine reports of new federal activity around Fulton County ballots and how that could deepen distrust and fuel a fresh battle over who controls elections: local officials, state legislatures, or Washington.

It’s a deep dive into how one case that began as a “firewall” against presidential immunity ended as a cautionary tale about legal strategy, prosecutorial conduct, and the fragile balance between state power, federal oversight, and the right to vote in Georgia.