Finding Ana: The Trial Of Brian Walshe | The Murder Of Ana Walshe cover art

Finding Ana: The Trial Of Brian Walshe | The Murder Of Ana Walshe

Finding Ana: The Trial Of Brian Walshe | The Murder Of Ana Walshe

By: True Crime Today
Listen for free

About this listen

The disappearance of Ana Walshe shocked the country. The case against her husband, Brian Walshe, has only grown more disturbing with every new filing, every hearing, every piece of digital and forensic evidence revealed in court. Now, as the murder trial begins, we’re breaking it all down — every motion, every witness, every allegation, every contradiction — with the depth, clarity, and psychological insight you expect from Hidden Killers and True Crime Today.

This channel dives into the full story in real time: the timeline prosecutors say points to a calculated crime, the mountain of digital searches, the forensic evidence investigators recovered, the dramatic hearings over what the jury will and won’t see, and the defense strategies designed to poke holes in a case built without a recovered body. No speculation. No sensationalism. Just a raw, detailed, relentless look at the facts, the filings, and the courtroom moments shaping one of the most closely watched trials in America.

You’ll hear expert insight, behavioral and psychological analysis, legal breakdowns, narrative deep dives, and daily updates as the trial unfolds. From the early morning Google searches to the surveillance videos, from the transfer station findings to the courtroom battles over admissibility, we’re covering every inch of this case as it happens.

Whether you’re here for the legal strategy, the investigative work, the forensic details, or the psychological story behind it all, this is where you get the most complete, no-nonsense coverage of the Brian Walshe trial — direct from the Hidden Killers team.

Subscribe and stay with us for the truth, the timeline, and the trial.True Crime Today
Politics & Government True Crime
Episodes
  • Ana Walshe Murder Case: Everything You Need to Know Before Brian Walshe’s Trial Starts
    Nov 25 2025
    The trial of Brian Walshe is finally here, and before opening statements begin, we’re breaking down everything you need to know to understand what this case is really about. For nearly three years, the disappearance of Ana Walshe has been a story built on fragments — timelines, surveillance clips, digital searches, and unanswered questions. But now, with a full jury seated and the courtroom ready, we’re entering the phase where all of those pieces will be tested under oath.

    In this episode, we walk you through the entire case from the beginning: who Brian Walshe is, the troubled backdrop of the federal fraud charges he was facing, and the mounting pressure inside the marriage in the months leading up to Ana’s disappearance. We revisit the last confirmed moments of Ana’s life, the days that followed, and the early investigative red flags that shifted this from a missing-person report to a homicide investigation.

    We explore the evidence — the digital searches prosecutors say were made in the early morning hours, the timeline inconsistencies, the surveillance footage, and the items recovered from multiple trash locations. We also dig into the defense strategy: what they’re likely to challenge, how they may attack the timeline, and what they might focus on as they argue reasonable doubt in a case without a recovered body.

    And we unpack the stunning decision by Walshe to plead guilty to misleading investigators and improper disposal, but not to the murder charge — a move that fundamentally reshapes how jurors will hear this case.

    This is your complete guide to the story behind the trial, the stakes, the unanswered questions, and what may unfold when testimony begins.

    Subscribe for more in-depth analysis from Hidden Killers with Tony Brueski.

    #HiddenKillers #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #TrueCrime #CourtCase #TrialUpdate #LegalAnalysis #CrimeNews #JusticeSystem #Podcast


    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    Show More Show Less
    19 mins
  • What’s Left of Brian Walshe’s Defense After His Bombshell Plea-WEEK IN REVIEW
    Nov 24 2025
    Brian Walshe’s courtroom strategy just blew apart. When he stood in front of a judge and admitted — in his own voice — that he willfully conveyed Ana Walshe’s remains and misled investigators, he didn’t just plead guilty to two charges. He detonated the core of the defense narrative he’s been hiding behind for nearly two years. Now he’s walking into a murder trial without the one thing most defendants in no-body cases cling to: deniability.

    In this episode of Hidden Killers, we break down exactly how this guilty plea changes the entire trajectory of the trial and what it leaves his defense team scrambling to do next. Because once you admit that you touched the remains, once you admit you interfered with the investigation, once you admit you contributed to evidence being destroyed, you’re no longer arguing about whether you were involved. You’re arguing about how deep that involvement goes.

    So what does Brian Walshe have left? What does a defense look like when you’ve already admitted to actions that most jurors see as the behavior of someone with something enormous to hide? We examine the only narrative his team has left: the idea that Ana’s death was not murder, that something happened suddenly or unexpectedly, and that Brian spiraled into panic and made disastrous choices afterward. It’s a narrow road — one that has to compete with a mountain of digital searches, forensic findings, surveillance footage, and behavior prosecutors say lay out a chilling timeline.

    This episode digs into the strategies the defense is likely to deploy, how they’ll try to reinterpret the incriminating searches, how they’ll frame his mental state, and why they may try to turn the guilty plea itself into proof of honesty rather than guilt.

    With the trial about to begin, and with 70 potential jurors being questioned, this case is entering a new phase — one where the stakes for Brian Walshe couldn’t be higher, and his room to maneuver couldn’t be smaller.

    Subscribe for daily trial coverage, expert analysis, and every major update as it happens.


    #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #HiddenKillers #TrueCrimeToday #TrueCrimeUpdates #CourtCase #TrialCoverage #JusticeSystem #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeCommunity


    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    Show More Show Less
    14 mins
  • Two Cases Just Shifted — Brian Walshe’s Plea Flip & WSU Under Kohberger Fallout Fire
    Nov 23 2025
    Two major true-crime cases just took sharp, unexpected turns — one in the courtroom, one in the civil arena.

    First, Brian Walshe blindsided the court by pleading guilty to disposing of Ana Walshe’s remains and misleading investigators — but still maintaining he didn’t kill her. It’s a move that redefines the entire murder trial and forces huge strategic shifts for both sides.

    Then, across the country, Washington State University is facing legal heat. The Goncalves family has filed a civil claim arguing WSU ignored repeated warnings about Brian Kohberger before the Moscow murders. More than a dozen complaints. A professor calling him a future predator. Students saying they felt trapped and unsafe. The question now is simple: Does the law say the university should have done more?

    On today’s episode of Hidden Killers, Tony Brueski sits down with legal analyst Eric Faddis to break down both cases:

    • Why did Walshe plead guilty to these charges but not murder?
    • Does this strengthen the prosecution’s theory — or hand the defense a new angle?
    • What does the jury hear now, and how will it shape perception?
    • And in the WSU civil case — what duty does a university owe?
    • What evidence matters most?
    • Does foreseeability apply when the crime occurred off-campus at another school?
    • And is the real goal here discovery — forcing WSU’s internal files out into the light?

    Two cases. Two seismic shifts. One conversation that lays out the stakes, the law, and the fallout.

    #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #BrianWalshe #BryanKohberger #WSU


    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    Show More Show Less
    55 mins
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.