In this episode of Film Jury, we put Possession on trial.

Directed by Andrzej Żuławski and starring Isabelle Adjani and Sam Neill, this cult psychological horror has built a reputation as one of the most disturbing films ever made. But is it brilliant… or just unhinged?

James votes GUILTY.
Kat votes GUILTY.
Kristina stands alone with a bold NOT GUILTY.

We break down:

• The Berlin Wall as a metaphor for emotional division
• The infamous subway scene and what is actually happening
• The monster, the doubles, and the collapse of identity
• Whether Heinrich is a real rival or a stepping stone
• The espionage subplot and the meaning of the pink socks
• And the explosive ending that leaves no one untouched

Is this film a masterpiece about divorce and psychological annihilation?
Or an indulgent spiral of hysteria dressed up as art?

The jury debates performance intensity, symbolism overload, and whether the chaos is intentional genius or emotional excess.

One thing is certain. Nobody walks away neutral.

Court is in session.

Court is back in session.

In this episode of Film Jury, James Patrick is joined by Kat Reynolds and Heidi Romans to dissect Crimson Peak, directed by Guillermo del Toro. As part of the show's "Love Hurts" series, the jury debates whether this lush Gothic romance was misunderstood at release… or simply overindulgent.

Was it wrongly marketed as a horror film?
Is it a love story in disguise?
And does stunning production design make up for underwritten characters?

• Improper Marketing: Sold as a haunted house horror, delivered as a Gothic romance in the tradition of Bluebeard.

• Visual Brilliance vs. Narrative Depth: Jaw-dropping cinematography, saturated reds and greens, meticulous costuming… but are the characters fully developed?

• CGI vs. Practical Effects: A heated debate over the film's ghost design and whether del Toro's reliance on CGI undercuts the immersion.

• The Real Monster: In classic del Toro fashion, are the true villains supernatural… or human?

• The symbolic use of color and costume to track Edith's transformation.

• Del Toro's recurring themes of reframing "monster" versus "human," seen in films like Pan's Labyrinth and The Shape of Water.

• Tom Hiddleston's baronet energy and whether Sir Thomas is a romantic lead or something far more sinister.

• The underwritten Alan debate. Romantic hero or narrative afterthought?

• Why this film might have worked better as a limited series.

• Tom Hiddleston as Sir Thomas Sharpe

• Jessica Chastain as Lucille Sharpe

• Charlie Hunnam as Alan McMichael

• Mia Wasikowska as Edith Cushing

Strong opinions.
Respectful disagreement.
One host threatening to flip a metaphorical table.

Is Crimson Peak a misunderstood Gothic masterpiece?
A visually stunning but emotionally thin experience?
Or a film that deserves admiration even if it doesn't earn affection?

The verdict is final.

🎧 Warning: Major spoilers ahead.

On this episode of Film Jury, jurors James, Kat, and Kristina put It Follows on trial. What begins as a minimalist horror premise unfolds into a deeply unsettling meditation on inevitability, trauma, sexuality, and time.

The jury breaks down the film scene by scene, unpacking its symbolic language. The walking entity. The role of water and blood. The use of classic monster movies. The anachronistic setting. The way fear invades classrooms, bedrooms, pools, and family homes. Nothing is accidental, and nothing offers easy answers.

Is It Follows a morality tale, a coming-of-age nightmare, or an existential horror about death itself?

After examining its themes, symbolism, and lasting impact, the jury delivers a unanimous verdict.

James: Not Guilty.
Kat: Not Guilty.
Kristina: Not Guilty.

It Follows walks away free, still following, and still haunting long after the credits roll.