FTC Labels ABA a Monopoly (Ep. 537)
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
FTC Labels ABA a Monopoly (Ep. 537)
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
The FTC submitted a letter to the Texas Supreme Court supporting its decision to drop the ABA as the state’s official accreditor. Ben and Nathan agree that the ABA has been slow to modernize and often lags behind student needs, but they don’t fully align with the FTC’s reasoning.
Also in this episode:
- A listener asks whether to choose a part-time or full-time law program.
- Whether to cancel an official score that comes in lower than a prior LSAT.
- A personal statement with an unusually bold opening.
Links Mentioned:
FTC Letter to Texas Supreme Court
Study with our Free Plan
Download our iOS app
Watch Episode 537 on YouTube
Check out all of our “What’s the Deal With” segments
Get caught up with our Word of the Week library
Questions? help@thinkinglsat.com
0:00 When to Take Practice Tests
6:11 FTC Claims the ABA is a Monopoly
21:43 Full-Time vs. Part-Time Law Programs
29:47 Tips from Departing Demons
35:02 Performing Worse on the First Section
43:19 Cancelling a Lower Score
46:45 Personal Statement Gong Show