Episode 387 - Steven Adler - Noncompete and Restrictive Covenants
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to basket failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
Summary
In this episode of The Compliance Guy podcast, Sean M Weiss interviews Steven Adler, co-chair of litigation at Mandelbaum Barrett PC, focusing on non-compete agreements and restrictive covenants in healthcare. They discuss the complexities of these agreements, the rights of patients, and the implications of a recent case involving Dr. Timothy Vogel, a pediatric neurosurgeon. The conversation highlights the importance of legal counsel in navigating employment agreements and the enforceability of non-compete clauses.
Takeaways
- Non-competes are often negotiated and rarely go to trial.
- Restrictive covenants can include non-solicitation and confidentiality clauses.
- Patients have the right to choose their treating physician, even if a non-compete exists.
- Courts generally respect the doctor-patient relationship in these cases.
- The enforceability of non-compete agreements varies by state and circumstance.
- Legal counsel is crucial when signing employment agreements in healthcare.
- Many physicians mistakenly believe non-compete agreements are unenforceable.
- The geographic scope of non-compete agreements must be reasonable.
- Blue penciling allows courts to modify overly broad agreements.
- The credibility of witnesses can significantly impact trial outcomes.
No reviews yet
In the spirit of reconciliation, Audible acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their connections to land, sea and community. We pay our respect to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples today.