The recent firing of an immigration judge with a staggering 97% asylum grant rate highlights a significant shift in the U.S. immigration system under the Trump administration. This move is part of a broader trend, with over a hundred judges dismissed, indicating a decisive pivot towards stricter enforcement and a redefinition of judicial roles. The new judges, predominantly from law enforcement backgrounds, are being referred to as 'deportation judges,' reflecting a shift in focus from facilitating immigration to enforcing immigration laws more rigorously.

–

Join me and Ross Givens this Thursday February 26th at 3pm EST and learn how you can use the same insider information Pelosi and others have used to make MILLIONS. You’re not going to want to miss out on this once in a lifetime FREE TRAINING! Click this link to register TODAY!! https://turleytalksinsidertrading.com/registration/?tambid=18762

*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*

Got a question you want me to answer directly? Join me live Monday night for our members-only Q&A. Link below—come on in. https://turley.pub/club

Highlights:

• "97% asylum grant rate prompts the firing of New York immigration judge."
• "Over a hundred immigration judges removed, reshaping the judiciary landscape."
• "New judges primarily come from military and law enforcement backgrounds."
• "Shifting terminology from 'immigration judges' to 'deportation judges' signifies a policy overhaul."

–

Thanks for tuning in! Loved the episode? Subscribe and leave a review to help us keep these conversations going.

Follow me on X: https://x.com/DrTurleyTalks

Want more insight like this? Sign up for Patriot Alerts—my FREE daily newsletter and weekly wrap-up: https://turley.pub/AlertPatriot

**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.