Ep. 3640 How Nancy Pelosi Beat Wall Street | 17,000% Returns EXPLAINED!
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
Nancy Pelosi's retirement marks the end of a controversial political career, during which she reportedly achieved a staggering 17,000% return on stock investments, leading many to question the ethics of her trading practices. The discussion highlights insider trading among politicians, revealing how Pelosi and others have leveraged non-public information for significant financial gains. Expert Ross Given provides insights into how everyday investors can legally and ethically capitalize on similar insider trading patterns to enhance their portfolios.
–
Join me and Ross Givens Thursday, November 20th, at 3pm EST and learn how you can use the same insider information Pelosi and others have used to make MILLIONS. You’re not going to want to miss out on this once in a lifetime FREE TRAINING! Click this link to register TODAY!! https://turleytalksinsidertrading.com/registration/?tambid=18762
*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*
Highlights:
- “Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio reportedly saw a 17,000% return, raising ethical concerns.”
- “Ross Given explains how insider trading works and its prevalence among politicians.”
- “Everyday investors can legally follow insider trades to boost their investments.”
- “A free training event is offered to teach how to identify profitable insider trading signals.”
–
Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.
FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks
Sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter
**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands
Privacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy