New York Attorney General Letitia James faces multiple legal challenges that reveal significant alleged misconduct, including a federal indictment for mortgage fraud and accusations of selective enforcement in her prosecutions of Donald Trump. Legal experts note that she may face up to 60 years in prison for bank fraud and making false statements regarding her property. Additionally, a civil rights lawsuit has emerged, claiming she weaponized her office to silence citizens exposing voter roll irregularities, exposing the irony of her legal battles mirroring the charges she brought against Trump.

–

Go to http://TurleyGold.com or text TURLEY to 35052 to get instant access to this free report and learn how to take full control of your financial future.

*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*

Join me for a deep dive into C.S. Lewis’s The Abolition of Man — a book that exposes the roots of our cultural crisis and points us back to eternal truth. Watch your FREE preview of Episode 1 and download a digital copy of this powerful book here

https://turley.pub/abolitionofman

Highlights:

• "Letitia James indicted for mortgage fraud involving contradictory statements to lenders and the IRS."
• "Federal investigation into her selective enforcement against Trump and the NRA amid claims of political bias."
• "Civil rights lawsuit filed against James for allegedly suppressing evidence of voter roll fraud."
• "Irony of James facing the same accusations she leveled against Trump highlights potential corruption in her office."

–

Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.

FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks

Sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter

**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.