E9. Beyond the Tick Box: Why Curriculum Mapping Isn’t Evidence of Learning
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from Wish List failed.
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
Disclaimer:
This episode was generated using AI narration via Google Notebook LM. It is based on and produced from the full article published on the Echoes of Learning and Teaching Substack.
🎧 Episode 9: “Beyond the Tick Box: Why Curriculum Mapping Isn’t Evidence of Learning”
In this episode of Echoes of Learning and Teaching, we take a closer look at a practice often celebrated in higher education — curriculum mapping — and ask whether alignment truly equals learning. Drawing on the Substack post “Beyond the Tick Box: Why Curriculum Mapping Isn’t Evidence of Learning”, we question if our neatly aligned frameworks are giving us a false sense of assurance.
We’ll explore questions like:
- When do students actually demonstrate the course learning outcomes that define their degree?
- Are we mistaking mapped alignment for authentic evidence of learning?
- What would it mean to move from tick-box compliance to meaningful demonstration — from mapping to meaning?
Join us as we unpack how curriculum design can go beyond coherence on paper and toward coherence in practice — where the assurance of learning isn’t found in spreadsheets, but in what students can do, create, and articulate as graduates.
🔗 Read the original post here: https://open.substack.com/pub/echoesoflearningandteaching/p/beyond-the-tick-box-why-curriculum
💭 Want to explore more reflections on teaching and learning?
Read all the articles featured in this podcast on the Echoes of Learning and Teaching blog
There is also a curated collection on Flipboard