What’s best for skin closure at C-Section? Staples or suture? This debate has raged for over 20 years. Past data has shown greater odds of wound complications with metal staples compared to suture. But new a meta-analysis from June 2025 is challenging the prior results. In this episode, we will explore the data from 2010 to present day. PLUS, we will summarize a separate meta-analysis examining if wound dressing removal is tied to any wound complication. This was just published July 15, 2025 in the “Pink” journal. Listen in for details.

1. 2010: Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quiñones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):285.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.011. PMID: 20816153.

2. 2015: Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;212(5):621.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.020. Epub 2014 Dec 19. PMID: 25530592.

3. Jan 2025: Gabbai D, Jacoby C, Gilboa I, Maslovitz S, Yogev Y, Attali E. Comparison of complications and surgery outcomes in skin closure methods following cesarean sections. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;312(1):125-129. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07911-6. Epub 2025 Jan 25. PMID: 39862268; PMCID: PMC12176926.

4. June 2025: Post-cesarean skin closure with metal staples versus subcuticular suture in obese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Luis Sanchez-Ramos et al (Univ Florida). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pmf2.70061

5. DRESSING REMOVAL: July 15, 2025: Leshae A Cenac, Serena Guerra, Alicia Huckaby, Gabriele Saccone, Vincenzo Berghella. Early Wound Dressing (soft gauze/tape dressing) Removal after Cesarean Delivery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials: Short title: early wound dressing removal after cesarean, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM, 2025; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101739.

6. https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf

We have covered Low Dose Aspirin (LDA) for pre-natal preeclampsia prevention MANY times before. But here's a good clinical question: Since preeclampsia can also pop-up in the first 6 weeks postpartum (pp), should we continue it in the immediate pp interval? There is a new publication, an RCT, in the AJOG that looked to answer this- and we will highlight that publication in this episode. PLUS, we will briefly summarize a separate publication from the American J Perinatology back in 2023 that also provided some clinical insights on this topic. Listen in for details.

1. The association between postpartum aspirin use and NT-proBNP levels as a marker for maternal cardiac health: a randomized-controlled trial; July 2025 (AJOG): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937825004752

2. Christenson E, Stout MJ, Williams D, Verma AK, Davila-Roman VG, Lindley KJ. Prenatal Low-Dose Aspirin Use Associated with Reduced Incidence of Postpartum Hypertension among Women with Preeclampsia. Am J Perinatol. 2023 Mar;40(4):394-399. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1728826. Epub 2021 May 3. PMID: 33940641.

3. Mendoza M, Bonacina E, Garcia-Manau P, et al. Aspirin Discontinuation at 24 to 28 Weeks’ Gestation in Pregnancies at High Risk of Preterm Preeclampsia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023;329(7):542–550. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.0691

Amniotic Fluid Sludge (AFS) has been theorized to be sonographic evidence of an underlying infection/inflammation. Others have proposed it may represent an organized clot from the placental surface. At the same time, the finding of AFS may be more common as a benign finding especially at/after 40 weeks as the amniotic fluid accumulates shed skin cells, vernix, and possibly meconium past 41 weeks. What can be tell the patient when we identify AFS in the early second trimester? What do we do with this? In this episode, we will summarize the data on second trimester AFS and review the evidence-based “next steps” in care. Does this require empiric antibiotic therapy in the asymptomatic patient? Listen in for details.

1. Zimmer EZ, Bronshtein M. Ultrasonic features of intra-amniotic "unidentified debris' at 14-16 weeks' gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Mar;7(3):178-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07030178.x. PMID: 8705409.
2. Pannain GD, Pereira AMG, Rocha MLTLFD, Lopes RGC. Amniotic Sludge and Prematurity: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;45(8):e489-e498. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1772189. Epub 2023 Sep 8. PMID: 37683661; PMCID: PMC10491474.

Podcast family, we are in process of an exciting rebrand! Dr. Chapa's Clinical Pearls will soon become our legacy show as we change names and channels to, "Dr. Chapa's OBGYN No Spin Podcast". This will allow us to better align with our mission. Listen in for details and FIND US, as Dr. Chapa's OBGYN No Spin Podcast!!

Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy (ICP) has dichotomous effects: Benign for the mother (although the itching it causes may be a qualify of life issue, yet potentially devasting for the child in-utero. In 2021, SMFM released Consult series 53 on the subject. This, together with the ACOG 's CO 831 (Medically Indicated Late Preterm and early term delivery) also from 2021 provide management options for ICP. However, this month- July 2025- Dr. Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman et al published a new proposed ICP classification and management schema that is easy to follow. Listen in for details.

​ SMFM CS #53,2021​ ACOG CO #831, 2021​ Sarker M, Ramos GA, Ferrara L, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Simplifying Management of Cholestasis: A Proposal for a Classification System. Am J Perinatol. 2025 Jul;42(9):1229-1234. doi: 10.1055/a-2495-3553. Epub 2024 Dec 4. PMID: 39631774