How did a birthday trip to Cabo San Lucas end with Shanquella Robinson dead in less than 24 hours? Why did her travel companions initially claim “alcohol poisoning” — and how did a viral assault video, conflicting autopsy findings, and a stalled U.S.–Mexico extradition fight turn the Shanquella Robinson case into one of the most haunting true crime mysteries of 2022?

In this episode, hosts Adrienne Barker and Joseph Lobosco revisit the death of 25‑year‑old Shanquella Robinson in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, breaking down the “Cabo Six” timeline, the shocking cell phone assault video, Mexico’s femicide arrest warrant, the FBI Charlotte investigation, and why U.S. federal prosecutors declined to file charges. This true crime podcast discussion explores the cross‑border legal roadblocks, the critical autopsy discrepancies between Mexico and North Carolina, and how the Robinson family’s wrongful death lawsuit may be the last path to uncovering what really happened inside that Cabo villa.

Tune in to hear:

October 28–29, 2022 – Cabo San Lucas birthday trip turns deadly: Shanquella Robinson travels from Charlotte, North Carolina to Cabo San Lucas, Mexico with six friends, is assaulted in a luxury villa the morning of October 29, and is later found unresponsive; after a delayed call for help, a doctor arrives, her condition deteriorates, and she is pronounced dead that evening.

October 29, 2022 – The hours that raise the hardest questions: Investigators’ timeline places the altercation around 7:00–7:30 AM, a housekeeper finds Shanquella unresponsive around midday, and the group reportedly calls for medical help around 2:15 PM — setting up a major debate about delayed aid, negligence, and preventable loss of life.

October 30, 2022 – The “alcohol poisoning” story and the family’s suspicions: Shanquella’s travel companions return to the U.S., bring her luggage to her family, and tell her mother, Celand Robinson, that she died from alcohol poisoning — a claim that quickly clashes with what investigators and reports later indicate.

Mid‑November 2022 – The viral assault video that changed everything: A disturbing cell phone video leaks and spreads online, appearing to show Shanquella being beaten while others watch, contradicting early claims about her death and igniting international outrage and demands for justice.

October–November 2022 – Mexican autopsy findings and a “violent” manner of death: Mexican medical examiners conduct a partial autopsy and record findings that point to a violent death, including severe spinal cord injury and “atlas luxation” — escalating the case into a homicide investigation.

November 2022 – Mexico issues a femicide arrest warrant and seeks extradition: Mexican authorities identify a primary female aggressor and obtain an arrest warrant on femicide charges, while an extradition request and international alerts collide with the reality that the “Cabo Six” are already back in the United States.

November 2022 – The FBI Charlotte investigation and tips about possible evidence: The FBI opens a parallel investigation, fields tips describing injuries and possible surveillance cameras, and coordinates with Mexican authorities as the case becomes a cross‑border legal standoff.

November 17, 2022 – The U.S. autopsy conflict that reshapes the case: The Mecklenburg County Medical Examiner’s office performs an autopsy in North Carolina, reporting no spinal cord injury or broken neck and ultimately listing the cause of death as “undetermined” — creating a pivotal forensic contradiction that complicates prosecution and extradition.

March–April 2023 – Calls for federal action and DOJ declines to prosecute: Family attorneys (including Ben Crump and Sue Ann Robinson) urge U.S. intervention, but on April 12, 2023, the Department of Justice and FBI inform the family...

What happened to 18-year-old Natalee Holloway after she vanished on a 2005 graduation trip to Aruba—and why did the case remain unresolved for nearly two decades? Did investigators miss critical opportunities in the first hours, and can the public trust anything Joran van der Sloot has ever said after years of shifting stories and alleged lies?

In this episode of Debate The News: True Crime, hosts Adrienne Barker and Joseph Lobosco revisit the full timeline of the Natalee Holloway disappearance, from her last known moments after a night out at Carlos and Charlie’s in Oranjestad to the U.S. extortion and wire fraud case, van der Sloot’s Peru imprisonment for the murder of Stephanie Flores Ramírez, and the bombshell 2023 guilty plea and confession that prosecutors say finally explained what happened. The live discussion also debates alleged investigative missteps, corruption claims, the credibility of van der Sloot’s confession, and what a school-sponsored senior trip should have done differently to keep students safe.

Tune in to hear:

May 30, 2005 – Natalee Holloway vanishes in Aruba: Natalee travels from Mountain Brook, Alabama to Aruba with classmates to celebrate graduation. On the final night, she is last seen leaving Carlos and Charlie’s around 1:30 AM with three local young men, including 17-year-old Joran van der Sloot, and then fails to board her flight home as search efforts by land and sea turn up no trace.

June–September 2005 – Arrests, shifting stories, and no charges: Attention centers on van der Sloot and brothers Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, among the last known people with Natalee. The three are arrested on suspicion of kidnapping and murder, but with no physical evidence and inconsistent accounts, they are released without charges.

2006–2007 – Contradictions mount, the case stalls: The hosts walk through how van der Sloot’s story changes repeatedly—claims about dropping Natalee at a hotel contradicted by surveillance, plus later interviews that keep raising questions—while prosecutors still lack the evidence needed to move forward.

November 2007 – Re-arrests and another release: Authorities arrest van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers again, but all are released within weeks for lack of evidence, leaving Natalee’s family and the public furious as the investigation loses momentum.

Early 2008 – Hidden camera video and renewed attention: Dutch reporter Peter R. de Vries airs hidden-camera footage that appears to show van der Sloot implicating himself. The case is revisited, but officials cannot corroborate the statements on tape and no charges follow.

March 2010 – FBI sting and extortion scheme: Nearly five years after Natalee disappears, van der Sloot allegedly demands $250,000 to reveal what happened and where her remains are. Beth Holloway alerts the FBI, a sting is arranged, and he receives $25,000 through a mix of cash and wire transfers—then later admits the story he sold the family was “worthless,” leading to federal wire fraud and extortion charges in the U.S.

May 30, 2010 – Stephanie Flores Ramírez is killed in Peru: Exactly five years after Natalee vanished, 21-year-old Stephanie Flores Ramírez is found dead in a Lima hotel room registered to van der Sloot. He flees, is captured days later, and the case becomes a second tragedy tied to the same suspect.

2012 – Natalee is declared legally dead: An Alabama judge declares Natalee Holloway legally deceased as her

Did Ana Walshe really leave her Cohasset, Massachusetts home at 4:00 a.m. on New Year’s Day 2023 for a last‑minute “work emergency” — or was that the first lie in a deadly cover‑up? And how does a missing‑person report turn into a “no‑body” murder case built on digital breadcrumbs, blood evidence, and a trail of trash bags across the Boston suburbs?

In this episode of Debate The News: True Crime, hosts Adrienne Barker and Joseph Lobosco revisit the disappearance of Ana Walshe, the 39‑year‑old mother of three who vanished after New Year’s Eve, and the investigation that led police to focus on her husband, Brian Walshe — culminating in a first‑degree murder conviction and a life‑without‑parole sentence even though Ana’s body was never recovered.

Tune in to hear:

January 1, 2023 – Last seen in Cohasset, MA: Brian Walshe claims Ana leaves their home around 4:00 a.m. for a supposed work emergency, heading to Boston’s Logan Airport for a flight to Washington, D.C. Investigators later find no evidence of an Uber/Lyft pickup and no proof she boarded any flight.

January 4–7, 2023 – The missing-person report & search intensifies: Ana’s employer reports her missing after she fails to appear for work, prompting a welfare check at the home and a large‑scale search of the Walshe property and nearby woods. Police note suspicious details, including Brian’s Volvo cargo area appearing prepared for transport.

January 1–2, 2023 – The Google-search trail: Prosecutors later reveal a chilling series of searches (made using a child’s iPad) including queries about body decomposition, dismemberment, and how long someone must be missing to inherit — suggesting planning as the public still hopes for Ana’s safe return.

January 2–3, 2023 – Hardware-store purchases & dumpster runs: Surveillance footage shows Brian shopping for cleaning and disposal supplies (including a Tyvek suit, tarps, tape, and a hatchet) and then moving heavy trash bags to multiple dumpsters at apartment complexes — behavior investigators interpret as evidence disposal.

January 8–9, 2023 – Search warrants, blood evidence, and the “trash pull”: A search of the home allegedly turns up blood evidence, and investigators trace dumpsters to a transfer station where they recover bags containing items prosecutors describe as blood‑soaked tools and materials, plus personal items tied to Ana. The case pivots from missing person to homicide investigation.

January 17–March 2023 – Murder charges & indictment: Norfolk County District Attorney Michael Morrissey announces murder charges; Brian is arraigned and later indicted by a grand jury for first‑degree murder along with related charges tied to lying to investigators and improper handling of remains.

Backstory – Red flags, alleged threats, and a reported “ransom” distraction: The hosts discuss disturbing prior allegations (including an older report to police about threats) and prosecutors’ claim that a phony ransom note surfaced during the early days of the investigation.

February 2024 – The art-fraud conviction: The episode also digs into Brian Walshe’s separate federal case involving fake Andy Warhol paintings and related artwork fraud — a backdrop that shapes how the public views his credibility and motive.

November–December 2025 – The Dedham murder trial, the “no-body” verdict, and sentencing: After delays and pretrial developments,...

A Santa suit. A wrapped “gift.” A family Christmas Eve party in Covina, California. So how did the 2008 Covina Christmas Eve massacre—one of the most notorious holiday true crime cases in Los Angeles County—end with nine people dead after a man dressed as Santa opened fire and set a home ablaze? And what do the warning signs of divorce rage, hidden secrets, and careful premeditation reveal about the “Killer Santa” case and the devastating impact of domestic violence–fueled revenge?

In “Homicide for the Holidays: The Case of the Killer Santa,” hosts Adrienne Barker and Joseph Lobosco revisit the harrowing story of Bruce Jeffrey Pardo, the so-called “Killer Santa,” and the Christmas Eve attack that devastatingly wiped out much of the Ortega family. From the unraveling of Pardo’s marriage to Sylvia Ortega and the financial collapse that followed, to the Santa disguise, the mass shooting, the arson attack, and the attempted escape plan that ended in suicide—this true crime podcast discussion breaks down the timeline, the motive, and the lasting trauma carried by survivors and an entire community.

Tune in to hear:

2001 – A buried secret & a pattern of abandonment: Pardo’s 13-month-old son nearly drowns, suffers permanent brain damage, and Pardo reportedly withdraws—stopping visits and concealing the situation from those around him.

2004–January 2006 – Marriage begins, cracks form quickly: Pardo meets Sylvia Ortega through her brother, presents as a stable, church-going engineer, and the two marry—while tensions grow over money, control, and what Sylvia later learns about his hidden disabled child.

Early–mid 2008 – Divorce, financial pressure, and escalating resentment: Sylvia files for divorce; spousal support is ordered; Pardo loses his job and begins blaming Sylvia and the system for everything falling apart.

Mid 2008–September 2008 – Premeditation and preparation: Investigators later connect a month-by-month buildup—multiple 9mm pistols purchased over time, stockpiled racing fuel, a custom extra-large Santa suit, and a homemade fuel-spraying device boxed like a Christmas present.

December 18, 2008 – Divorce ruling as a trigger point: The divorce is finalized in court; Pardo keeps the house but must pay Sylvia and give up property—described as a key moment that fuels his revenge narrative.

Christmas Eve 2008 (around 11:30 PM) – The doorbell, the disguise, and the first shot: At a packed Ortega family holiday gathering on Nocrest Drive in Covina, an 8-year-old girl opens the door to “Santa”—and Pardo allegedly shoots her in the face before moving into the home.

Minutes later – Mass shooting inside the Christmas party: With multiple handguns and magazines, Pardo fires through the living room as guests flee; nine family members die from gunshots, the fire, or both—while several others survive with severe injuries.

The arson attack – A “gift” becomes a flamethrower: Pardo opens the large present and sprays racing fuel through the home; the house erupts in flames, ammunition cooks off, and first responders battle an inferno for hours as victims are later identified (in some cases) through dental records due to the destruction.

Christmas Day 2008 – Escape plan collapses and ends in suicide: Burned but alive, Pardo flees to the San Fernando Valley, where he dies by suicide; investigators find cash, travel plans, additional ammunition, and evidence of explosives—plus a second vehicle and supplies consistent with an alternate getaway route.

Motive, intended targets, and aftermath – Divorce rage on a community scale: Police and the hosts examine revenge as the central motive, including...

Did Scott Peterson murder his eight‑months‑pregnant wife, Laci Peterson, on Christmas Eve 2002 — or was he falsely convicted on flimsy circumstantial evidence amplified by a nonstop media frenzy? From Modesto, California to the Berkeley Marina and the San Francisco Bay, the Laci Peterson case remains one of America’s most argued true crime stories, raising hard questions about motive, “missing pregnant wife” investigations, and what juries do when there’s no body for months and no obvious crime scene.

In this episode, hosts Adrienne Barker and Joseph Lobosco revisit the disappearance and murder of Laci Peterson and her unborn son Conner (Connor), the affair with Amber Frey, the recovery of remains near the very waters where Scott said he went fishing, and the courtroom battle that ended in a conviction — followed by decades of appeals, juror‑misconduct fights, and post‑conviction DNA litigation that continues to evolve.

This true crime podcast discussion breaks down the Scott Peterson trial, the prosecution’s theory of dumping a body in the bay, the defense’s arguments about abduction and alternate suspects, the role of taped phone calls, and the latest Los Angeles Innocence Project filings — plus a live audience debate on guilt, reasonable doubt, and the ethics of “headline” innocence work.

Tune in to hear:

December 24, 2002 – Christmas Eve disappearance in Modesto: Scott says he leaves for a spur‑of‑the‑moment solo fishing trip at the Berkeley Marina while Laci stays home to walk the dog and prep for Christmas Eve — then the family dog is found wandering with its leash on, and Laci is reported missing as search efforts explode.

Late December 2002–January 2003 – Affair revealed & Amber Frey’s recorded calls: Investigators learn Scott is having an affair with Amber Frey, who secretly records conversations with him and later steps forward publicly — shifting Scott from “cooperating husband” to prime suspect in the court of public opinion.

April 3–4, 2003 – Remains recovered near the bay: A male fetus washes ashore, followed by badly decomposed adult female remains less than a mile away; DNA confirms the devastating discovery: Laci and Conner — found near the same area where Scott admits he was fishing.

April 18, 2003 – Arrest and charges: Scott is arrested in San Diego County; investigators cite items found during the stop (including cash, multiple phones, and changes to his appearance) as suspicious, while the defense frames it as media‑avoidance — and prosecutors charge him with murder counts tied to Laci and Conner.

June–November 2004 – The Redwood City murder trial: With Mark Geragos leading the defense, the trial unfolds under wall‑to‑wall national coverage. Prosecutors argue a motive rooted in deceit (the affair, looming fatherhood) and a bay‑dumping theory supported by location and current analysis; the defense argues there’s no direct evidence, no murder weapon, no eyewitness, and no proven cause of death — and pushes alternate‑perpetrator theories including a neighborhood burglary and possible abduction.

November 12, 2004–March 16, 2005 – Conviction and death sentence: After deliberation drama and juror turnover, Scott Peterson is found guilty; the jury recommends death, and he’s formally sentenced to death by lethal injection — later spending years on San Quentin death row during automatic appeals.

2012–2020 – Appeals and the juror #7 controversy:...

Did Aaron Hernandez’s 2017 prison suicide end the story — or just kick off a whole new mess? After the former New England Patriots tight end was convicted in the Odin Lloyd murder, what happened to his conviction, his money, and the people left picking up the pieces? And how do CTE, substance abuse, secrecy, and the NFL spotlight help explain (without excusing) one of the most infamous cases in modern sports true crime?

In this episode, hosts Adrienne Barker and Joseph Lobosco are joined by Debate The News founder Jonathan Bing to continue their deep dive into the Aaron Hernandez case — focusing on the aftershocks that didn’t get as much attention as the trials. The discussion covers the post‑death legal chaos around Hernandez’s murder conviction, the escalating trust fund dispute involving his ex-fiance, and the discovery of a secret apartment tied to the Odin Lloyd investigation, as well as the controversy over alleged suicide notes, speculation about a hidden double life, and the ripple effects that continue to hit the Hernandez family years later.

Tune in to hear:

April 2017–2019 – Conviction vacated, loophole rumors, then reinstated: After Aaron Hernandez’s 2017 prison suicide, a Massachusetts judge initially vacates his murder conviction because he died mid‑appeal, fueling speculation about financial motives — until the state’s highest court reinstates the conviction in 2019 and ends that doctrine going forward.

2017–present – The money trail after Hernandez’s death: The North Attleboro home sale, the trust created for his daughter Aviel, and the roles of trustee David Schwartz and Aviel’s mother as conservator — plus how pension/Social Security benefits factor into the case.

2022–present – Trust fund war (and why it got ugly fast): A $10,000 dance request sparks an audit, allegations of extravagant spending and questionable “education” expenses, and dueling court efforts to remove either the conservator or the trustee — with about $700,000 reportedly left in the trust.

2013 – The secret Franklin “flop house” apartment: The hidden apartment few people knew about, what investigators found inside (including items tied to the Odin Lloyd murder timeline), and why police also suspected drug activity connected to the location.

April 2017–2020 – Suicide notes and the double‑life controversy: Claims of three suicide notes (including a rumored third note to a prison boyfriend), attorney José Baez pushing back, and how prosecutors and later media coverage explored Hernandez’s sexuality as potential motive.

2023–February 2025 – DJ Hernandez’s breakdown and criminal case: The ESPN incident, alleged scouting of potential shooting locations, diagnoses reported in court, and the eventual outcome focused on treatment and supervised release.

2007–late 2025 – Earlier red flags revisited: The Gainesville shooting rumors that were later closed without charges, the Gainesville bar fight at The Swamp, and Tim Tebow’s later comments arguing the incident has been inaccurately portrayed.

Debate & analysis – CTE, drugs, mental illness, and accountability: A blunt discussion on whether Hernandez was simply a “stone cold murderer,” how CTE and substance abuse may (or may not) factor in, and what responsibility (if any) the NFL/Patriots should carry for off‑field

In this episode, Joseph and Adrienne break down the chilling Carman family saga: the 2013 shooting death of Connecticut millionaire grandfather John Chakalos, the 2016 disappearance of his daughter Linda on a midnight fishing trip off New England, and the role of her son, Nathan, who is later rescued alone after eight days at sea and eventually indicted for murder on the high seas and fraud before dying by suicide in jail.

Nathan Carman, diagnosed with autism and struggling with mental health and isolation, grows up financially supported but heavily pressured by his wealthy grandfather, John. In 2013, John is found shot in his bed with no forced entry, shortly after Nathan buys a matching‑caliber rifle and discards key electronics, leading police to name him a person of interest but never charge him. Nathan later inherits roughly $550,000 and stands to gain about $7 million more if his mother Linda’s share of the $40+ million estate passes to him after she vanishes during a deep‑sea fishing trip aboard his boat, *Chickenpox*, which a federal judge later rules was intentionally rendered unseaworthy by human action — most likely Nathan’s.

Joseph, Adrienne, and live guests debate whether Nathan was truly stranded at sea or staged his survival to cover up a planned homicide for inheritance, including questions around his physical condition at rescue, the missing mayday call, the altered boat, and the mysteriously sinking life raft. They dig into how autism and flat affect complicate public perception of guilt, whether John’s murder and Linda’s disappearance are parts of a single two‑step financial plot or two unrelated tragedies, and why Linda agreed to an isolated offshore trip with a son she had reportedly feared. The episode closes with hard safety takeaways about estate planning, documenting threats, avoiding isolated meetings with dangerous family members, and using domestic violence resources even when the abuser is your own adult child.

⚖️ Disclaimer: Debate the News: True Crime Edition is for informational and discussion purposes only. We are not attorneys, law enforcement officers, medical professionals, or forensic experts. While we research each case, the show is recorded live with minimal editing; any factual errors are unintentional. The episode also includes discussion of graphic violence, guns, terrorism‑related charges, and more. Listener discretion is strongly advised. Guest and audience views are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the hosts or producers.

Speakers:

→ Adrienne Barker — Host

→ Joseph Lobosco — Host

→ Debbie Dowling-Wahba — Guest Contributor

“Debate The News: True Crime”

Lost at Sea: The Carman Family Deaths

Created by: Jonathan Bing, Adrienne Barker and Joseph R. Lobosco

Producers: Adrienne Barker, Joseph R. Lobosco, and Jonathan Bing

Writers: Adrienne Barker & Joseph R. Lobosco

Editor: Joseph R. Lobosco

Cover Art: Joseph R. Lobosco

Special Thanks: Nelson, Lea, Nawzil, and the entire Chatter Social team

Theme Song: Alaina Cross — “Karma” [NCS Release]

Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds

Free Download/Stream: ncs.io/karma

Watch: ncs.lnk.to/karmaAT/youtube

🎧 A Debate the News: True Crime Production

📍 Recorded Live on Chatter Social

Download the Chatter Social app: (for

What really happened on that June 1994 night in Brentwood when Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman were brutally murdered outside her Bundy Drive condo? Did the “trial of the century” reveal the truth about who killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman — or did fame, police misconduct, and reasonable doubt allow justice to slip away?

In this episode, hosts Adrienne Barker and Joseph Lobosco revisit the 1994 Brentwood double homicide of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, the O.J. Simpson criminal murder trial, the civil wrongful death verdict, and the post‑death fight over O.J. Simpson’s estate. This true crime podcast discussion breaks down the Bundy Drive murders, the LAPD’s handling of the case, the infamous white Bronco chase, and the decades-long legal and moral questions that still divide the public.

Tune in to hear:

June 12–13, 1994 – Murders on Bundy Drive: Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman are found savagely stabbed outside Nicole’s Brentwood condo after a late-night visit, and LAPD quickly zeroes in on her ex-husband, football legend O.J. Simpson, who has just flown to Chicago.

Late 1970s–1992 – Relationship & domestic violence timeline: How O.J. met teenage waitress Nicole, married her, had two children, and was repeatedly accused of brutal abuse — including the 1989 New Year’s Day incident and Nicole’s chilling claims to friends that he would kill her and “get away with it,” even after their 1992 divorce.

June 13–17, 1994 – Evidence trail & Bronco chase: Detectives find blood at Bundy, Rockingham, and in O.J.’s white Ford Bronco, along with a matching bloody glove, DNA links, rare Bruno Magli shoe prints, and an unexplained hand injury — culminating in O.J.’s failure to surrender and the infamous low-speed white Bronco chase broadcast live nationwide.

January–October 1995 – “Trial of the Century”: The prosecution’s domestic-violence‑to‑murder narrative faces the “Dream Team” defense, which attacks LAPD integrity, highlights Mark Fuhrman’s racist slurs, questions DNA handling, and seizes on the glove demonstration — ending in a lightning-fast not‑guilty verdict that divides the country along racial and cultural lines.

1996–1997 – Civil wrongful death verdict: A Santa Monica jury, applying a lower legal standard, hears a streamlined case, finds O.J. Simpson liable for the wrongful deaths of Nicole and Ron, and awards $33.5 million — a judgment he largely avoids paying as he relocates to Florida and protects assets while the Goldman family later acquires rights to If I Did It.

2007–2017 – Las Vegas robbery & prison time: Simpson is recorded confronting memorabilia dealers in a Las Vegas hotel room, is convicted of armed robbery and kidnapping, sentenced to up to 33 years, serves about nine, and is paroled in 2017 — resurfacing in public life around Las Vegas while the shadow of the 1994 murders never fades.

April 2024–late 2025 – Death & estate battle: After O.J. Simpson dies from cancer at 76, media revive the Bundy Drive murders and the verdict, while Fred Goldman files a new creditor claim; Simpson’s Nevada estate accepts the decades-old judgment (now tens of millions with interest) and begins auctioning assets, even though the Goldmans are unlikely to recover the full amount.

Debate & analysis – Guilt, reasonable doubt, race & domestic violence: the hosts and guest contributors weigh in on whether they believe O.J. killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman, examine alternate theories and LAPD misconduct, dissect why the criminal and civil juries reached opposite conclusions, and close with a sobering look at domestic violence red flags, the dangers of leaving, and resources for those in abusive relationships.

⚖️ Disclaimer: